Ive never heard of it refered to as "martingale" Strategy.Either way its a winning strategy I know this because I have used it.Id like to hear your opinion on why its dumb?Seeing as you so fucking smart.black or red is almost a 50/50 chance the only thing that gives the"house" an edge is the zero.or on american roulette 2 zero's.Roulette has the second highest odds in a casino.Bacarat actually has the best odds.over the long run you WILL make money it just takes a while.Any good gambler knows its all about the long haul not the quick dollar.Just like poker pros they have their losing streaks but thats to be expected but in the end, if they always bet with the propabilities and odds the will end up profiting.
It is the Martingale strategy, feel free to Google it if you think I made it up. Why it is dumb is not an opinion, it is fact, and I will show you why it's dumb, then address the rest of your dumb post, then wait 24 hours for you to make another dumb post so I can shit on you again.
First, to start at 1$ and be able to overcome 13 spins against you, you would need a bankroll of $4096, and with that kind of roll, who wants to have a goal of winning 1$?
Now to take it to a reasonable amount, with a reasonable bankroll: For this example, assume that your initial bet is $100, and you Martingale until you walk away for the day with that $100 profit.
Let's assume your bankroll is $6300 (6 bets) to keep the doubling simple.
Each spin your chance to lose is 20/38 or 52.63157%. So his chance to lose 6 in a row and go broke is 52.63157% ^6 or about 1 in 47.
In 46 wins his bankroll never gets high enough for a 7th bet, so on average he will go broke in 47 days.
I hope this illustrates why Martingale is a horrible system, unless you are Martingaling in a vacuum with an infinite bankroll and infinite time. If it doesn't you really should grab the closest pencil, stick the point in your nose, then fall face first down some steps.
Moving on...Roulette has a house edge of roughly 5.26%
Blackjack with a typical strategy has a house edge of about 2%
Blackjack with a perfect (MIT) strategy has a house edge of 0 to .5%
Craps has a house edge of .8%
Baccarat has a house edge of 1.06%
Hell, Video Poker with perfect strategy only has a house edge of .5%
Moving on again...
over the long run you WILL make money it just takes a while.
Had to quote this because it is an unbelievably stupid thing to say. Over the long run the casino will make money, because that's how casino's work. They make money in the long run off their edges.
Any good gambler knows its all about the long haul not the quick dollar.
And this...Any good gambler knows that casino games are -EV, and that they will lose in the long haul, making them bad gamblers.
Just like poker pros they have their losing streaks but thats to be expected but in the end, if they always bet with the propabilities and odds the will end up profiting
Hey you finally said something I agree with! I'm not going to go into the technical detail about why this is correct, but I will tell you that it's correct because the house has an edge in Hold Em, assuming you're playing a raked game at a casino, but since you're not playing against the house, you can make the correct decisions often enough to do what's called "beating the rake."
Even with you having one sentence that made sense, I still want you to die.