The article is not givings links for fact but it does suggest the opposite of what I've read here on riu and other sources, all saying that blue MH is better than dual spec-hps for veg. If he did use uni research it at-least holds more water over growers who often don't have ''equal'' enough testing to conclude one is better than the other. Theirs also the element of commitment, after investing a lot of money into one particular setup (not just in this comparison case) people appear to swear blindly their option is the best option, rather than risking the notion they may have wasted money.
Anyway knowing the article could not be taken as fact I was interested to hear other views that could confirm or deny it through discussion. Any links either way would be great, too.
A poster on riu stated over 5k is a waste in veg. I'm not saying he is right and you are wrong, but what is your opinion on that?.
Perhaps knowing the specific end goal changes things. If bigger plants with thicker stems = more end yield then what is best light choice to achieve that growth in veg. I've seen plants that were big... but highly stretched with weak thin stems.