BrownsWeed
Member
I know this is mentioned constantly and a great worry but I want to ensure you that every study I have came across has found it impossible unless you are growing massive plots. Grow on my brothers
Depends what the area is but all of the studies (published papers) found it impossible to do on a large scale. Also Google maps is not the best source. The data is acquired from satellites such as LANDSAT where the resolution is low. Sure a low flying plane might be able to collect photos with high enough resolution but single or widely spaced plants is impossible to detect due to the resolution and weakness of NDVI. I'll try to link some studies when im at the computerAnd what makes you so certain ? I can see the address on your mail on Google Earth .
True that. Trails are one of the biggest reason patches are found. They can be spotted from the air. So when you can, walk under trees.In terms of detection well used trails are far greater indicators that can be spotted easily
Large grows in corn field or in a hillside or anywhere in the open are easy to spot especially if they are in an ordered patternLike most things in life, it depends. I saw pictures of grows in large cornfields that were easily spotted. Also there are some side by side photos of hilltops in Nor Cal that is as plain as the nose on your face. But for normal, half way hid grows, Google Earth is not a concern. Most of the time the pictures are 6-18 months old anyway.
I'll have to get a thread going with my old techniques. I created automated watering and fertilizing systems completely hidden underground and would check the grows only sparingly using binoculars most of the time with only minimal visits to the plantTrue that. Trails are one of the biggest reason patches are found. They can be spotted from the air. So when you can, walk under trees.
Yep. But even for them, most of the time the bud is in the drying room long before the picture is updated.Large grows in corn field or in a hillside or anywhere in the open are easy to spot especially if they are in an ordered pattern
One of my old growing buddies did the same thing with the binoculars. He hardly ever went to his plants. Just when they had to be sexed, then later when his ferts begin to run out. But I think he depended on rain for his watering. Back then, you just planted 100 plants and if 50 of them made it to harvest, you were happy. {seeds are free, you know}I'll have to get a thread going with my old techniques. I created automated watering and fertilizing systems completely hidden underground and would check the grows only sparingly using binoculars most of the time with only minimal visits to the plant
I can date the "current" picture of my farm to February 2015. That is because I had scalped our hayfield land, but hadn't planted the Longleaf pines in it yet.Yeah... Google maps update the pictures in late fall and the plants are already cut down every time I look at my plot.
Good thing my weed is not in neatly lined rows. You can see my veggie garden from space though. Good enough to tell it needed hoeing, even in February.http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2013/10/google_earth_satellite_images_help_bust_oregon_grower.php
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/google-earth-detectives-cannabis-farm-2486918
http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2011/11/dutch_to_find_illegal_cannabis_plots_from_space_vi.php
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2471787/Police-locate-marijuana-farm-using-Google-Earth-satellite-images-shows-plants-neatly-lined-row.html