Anotherlover
Active Member
Twist the system...[h=1]Fuck the system....[/h]
Twist the system...[h=1]Fuck the system....[/h]
Twist the system...
Good points. Cooperation is gotten when we ALIGN interests with others thru mutual trade and interaction. When we can't trade consensually, we should all agree on one thing, to leave the other guy alone and ask him to do the same.The earth is alive and has rights. People who can't get this through their head need to get a clue. We need to become symbiotic with it. I believe that in order to do this, our species must cooperate.
I see no evidence of either. We must develop this ethos within and for ourselves imo.The earth is alive and has rights.
I have pondered it long and hard. I have clues, and I do not understand or accept point one. Don't go Romans 1:20 on us, "God made everything and only idiots can't see that".People who can't get this through their head need to get a clue.
That is not our nature.We need to become symbiotic with it.
I was hoping for more than a visceral/emotional argument raised to axiom by fiat. It's the same mistake of which the Natural Law/Rights crowd is guilty: a seductive but ultimately maladaptive idea rendered doctrine by force of will. My opinion. cnI believe that in order to do this, our species must cooperate.
So I should be allowed to build a house in your front yard? And I should be able to throw a party in your back yard? You think law was just some bullshit thought up to scare people into doing what they want? Isn't that the exact reason we invented laws in the first place; to provide some kind of level and fair playing field instead of letting the strongest just doing what they want?The land owner? We are symbiotic with this earth, no one should own it.
Sorry Mitt, but I don't believe political scum knows what's best for me on any level. Law has the same effects as religion; it's just used to scare you into doing what they want.
Hey, don't think I'm against mud huts, and big fat, naked women with rough diamonds stuck on with beef fat. I'm not against any of it. I don't see any of it as inferior, in any way. And it may have been a better idea all along. We will see.Hey let's not forget Durban Poison now!
They do what "THEY" want anyway!!!!!!!!!!! Haven't you noticed that regarding law...it applies some and not to others.....arn't the strong ( Powerful ) doing what they want anyway......it happens in societies everyday around the world......in your home town....So I should be allowed to build a house in your front yard? And I should be able to throw a party in your back yard? You think law was just some bullshit thought up to scare people into doing what they want? Isn't that the exact reason we invented laws in the first place; to provide some kind of level and fair playing field instead of letting the strongest just doing what they want?
Better yet....FUCK THE TWISTED SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Twist the system...
No, I would have given no such biblical argument. Nor would I have rendered doctrine by force of will. I'm talking about our current path being unnatural.I see no evidence of either. We must develop this ethos within and for ourselves imo. I have pondered it long and hard. I have clues, and I do not understand or accept point one. Don't go Romans 1:20 on us, "God made everything and only idiots can't see that". That is not our nature.
I was hoping for more than a visceral/emotional argument raised to axiom by fiat. It's the same mistake of which the Natural Law/Rights crowd is guilty: a seductive but ultimately maladaptive idea rendered doctrine by force of will. My opinion. cn
Not really. "They" seem to be very opposed to marijuana, but lots of places are legalizing it for medicinal and recreational purposes. And for the record no one is building any structures on my property or partying in my back yard without permission from me. The laws appear to be working pretty well.They do what "THEY" want anyway!!!!!!!!!!! Haven't you noticed that regarding law...it applies some and not to others.....arn't the strong ( Powerful ) doing what they want anyway......it happens in societies everyday around the world......in your home town....
Laws? I think statutes were invented. Laws, like gravity are constant and not subject to the whims of man trying to control other people. So I do think alot of statutory law was indeed made up to scare people into compliance. I agree with your last line, might or majority doesn't equate to right.So I should be allowed to build a house in your front yard? And I should be able to throw a party in your back yard? You think law was just some bullshit thought up to scare people into doing what they want? Isn't that the exact reason we invented laws in the first place; to provide some kind of level and fair playing field instead of letting the strongest just doing what they want?
I think you missed the point...................there is the world we live in and the law of the land applies and then there is the world THEY live in in which the law of the land applies.......but only if its convenient or if it benefits THEM in some way.......you know good and dam well that the system is FUCKED....and I think others get what I am saying...as for anyone building anything in my back yard....well ya someone is doing that...my grandson...that little raskel...Not really. "They" seem to be very opposed to marijuana, but lots of places are legalizing it for medicinal and recreational purposes. And for the record no one is building any structures on my property or partying in my back yard without permission from me. The laws appear to be working pretty well.
What I am doing is denying that the earth is alive in the current sense of that phrase ... that it is an organism with the implications of action and purpose. I consider the Gaia idea to be religious in nature, a modern robe for animism. I guess what i am saying is that if you want me to believe that the earth is indeed alive, how would you demonstrate the truth of that proposal?No, I would have given no such biblical argument. Nor would I have rendered doctrine by force of will. I'm talking about our current path being unnatural.
So if symbiosis with the earth isn't natural in your opinion, and there is no evidence in your view that the earth is alive, I can't reason with you. You're clearly evoking a polarity akin to atheists vs creationists. I can only assume that you are interpreting what I said as though I were giving sermon.
Fine. If we don't think differently, then act differently, nothing on earth will change and crisis will not abate.