Ghost Car poilice chace.... Explain if u can!!!

LaKapitone said:

I've seen this before & the explanation that I've concluded with is the fence is not completely intact with the ground. In other words, when the car goes through the fence, the driver was attempting to bulldoze the fence down, although that particular fence [like many in my area] was not grounded. Meaning, the car went through it, yes, but not 'through' it. The fence went over the car & back down to the ground once the car completely went through, giving the illusion the car went 'through' the fence but in reality it went 'under'. Get it?

Now, I know the main point of disagreement will be 'well, why didn't the cops know he went under, surly they checked the fence...' but in reality, it's TV & the departments word. For all we know, they do know the car went under after further investigation of the fence/area, but didn't want to admit they're 'cop' was outsmarted. Many departments hide information, even as silly as that daily to savor humiliation for the department in talks. Not to mention other departments will always make fun of that department for letting a dude go under the fence, it happens. I've gone under many fences while walking home from school back in the day, that were not grounded & appeared to be solid fences.

All you have to do is go up to the fence & try to jump it & immediately you will be caught off balance because the fence will shake all over due to not being grounded. That's all I think happened, a combination of luck for the driver & not 100% information from the department. Of course the cop didn't go through the fence as well, he didn't know the fence was not grounded, not to mention he was baffled as to how this dude just went through it. The dude, on the other hand, wanted to go through it.

Click to expand...

JeSt3r said:

"Grounded" meaning having a bottom rail or bottom cable ~3 inches from the ground that the chain link is secured to so there is no "wobble"

Click to expand...

LaKapitone said:

I've seen this before & the explanation that I've concluded with is the fence is not completely intact with the ground. In other words, when the car goes through the fence, the driver was attempting to bulldoze the fence down, although that particular fence [like many in my area] was not grounded [or was & gave way]. Meaning, the car went through it, yes, but not 'through' it. The fence went over the car & back down to the ground once the car completely went through, giving the illusion the car went 'through' the fence but in reality it went 'under'. Get it?

Now, I know the main point of disagreement will be 'well, why didn't the cops know he went under, surly they checked the fence...' but in reality, it's TV & the departments word. For all we know, they do know the car went under after further investigation of the fence/area, but didn't want to admit they're 'cop' was outsmarted. Many departments hide information, even as silly as that daily to savor humiliation for the department in talks. Not to mention other departments will always make fun of that department for letting a dude go under the fence, it happens. I've gone under many fences while walking home from school back in the day, that were not grounded & appeared to be solid fences.

All you have to do is go up to the fence & try to jump it & immediately you will be caught off balance because the fence will shake all over due to not being grounded. That's all I think happened, a combination of luck for the driver & not 100% information from the department. Of course the cop didn't go through the fence as well, he didn't know the fence was not grounded, not to mention he was baffled as to how this dude just went through it. The dude, on the other hand, wanted to go through it.

Click to expand...