Hillary Clinton Goes Big On Gun Policy, Creates Contrast With Bernie Sanders

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
She promises to take administrative action on background checks if Congress doesn't act.

WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton will call Monday for substantial new limits on the availability and distribution of firearms, stepping aggressively into the debate over gun control in the wake of last week's mass shooting at a community college in Oregon.

The former secretary of state will outline four specific proposals during a pair of town hall events in New Hampshire, all of which are sure to inspire intense opposition from gun rights advocates. One of the proposals will put her directly at odds with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), her top competitor for the Democratic presidential nomination.

At the top of the list is a pledge to take administrative action if Congress fails to tighten the so-called gun show and Internet sales loopholes. Under current law, licensed dealers are required to conduct background checks and certify that potential buyers are not prohibited from owning guns. But unlicensed vendors, including some individual sellers at gun shows, don’t have to go through these steps.

Clinton plans to call for lawmakers to address the issue. But if they don't, she will require that anyone “attempting to sell a significant number of guns be deemed ‘in the business of selling firearms,’” which would “ensure that high-volume gun sellers are covered by the same common sense rules that apply to gun stores -- including requiring background checks on gun sales.” Asked what would constitute “a significant number of guns,” a Clinton aide responded, “There are a number of studies being conducted currently regarding illegal gun sales that could inform an eventual rulemaking.”

Such an administrative action would be a bold step, one bound to spark massive pushback. And it’s not clear how it would legally work. President Barack Obama said at a recent press conference he had exhausted all the tools available to him to strengthen gun control laws. Clinton’s campaign did not elaborate as to what legal avenues it is exploring.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-gun-control_5611d70ae4b0dd85030c6b3b
 
She promises to take administrative action on background checks if Congress doesn't act.

WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton will call Monday for substantial new limits on the availability and distribution of firearms, stepping aggressively into the debate over gun control in the wake of last week's mass shooting at a community college in Oregon.

The former secretary of state will outline four specific proposals during a pair of town hall events in New Hampshire, all of which are sure to inspire intense opposition from gun rights advocates. One of the proposals will put her directly at odds with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), her top competitor for the Democratic presidential nomination.

At the top of the list is a pledge to take administrative action if Congress fails to tighten the so-called gun show and Internet sales loopholes. Under current law, licensed dealers are required to conduct background checks and certify that potential buyers are not prohibited from owning guns. But unlicensed vendors, including some individual sellers at gun shows, don’t have to go through these steps.

Clinton plans to call for lawmakers to address the issue. But if they don't, she will require that anyone “attempting to sell a significant number of guns be deemed ‘in the business of selling firearms,’” which would “ensure that high-volume gun sellers are covered by the same common sense rules that apply to gun stores -- including requiring background checks on gun sales.” Asked what would constitute “a significant number of guns,” a Clinton aide responded, “There are a number of studies being conducted currently regarding illegal gun sales that could inform an eventual rulemaking.”

Such an administrative action would be a bold step, one bound to spark massive pushback. And it’s not clear how it would legally work. President Barack Obama said at a recent press conference he had exhausted all the tools available to him to strengthen gun control laws. Clinton’s campaign did not elaborate as to what legal avenues it is exploring.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-gun-control_5611d70ae4b0dd85030c6b3b
Clinton trying to snatch loss from the mouth of victory?

Does she think the President can override the 2nd AND the subsequent judgements of the Supreme Court on the matter?

I support gun laws that are effective but don't restrict the rights of law abiding, sane people to own them.
 
Clinton trying to snatch loss from the mouth of victory?

Does she think the President can override the 2nd AND the subsequent judgements of the Supreme Court on the matter?

I support gun laws that are effective but don't restrict the rights of law abiding, sane people to own them.

bernie believes this too <sigh> guess he thinks just like..us.
 
bernie believes this too <sigh> guess he thinks just like..us.
How many times have I told you we believe virtually 100% of the same stuff except I know that a punitive tax on the rich would mean their flight to another country.
 
Maybe Hillary the witch should work on the murders of innocent people by the USA's use of drones before she attempts to disarm people domestically.
 
Bernie likes the USA to militarily occupy most of the world. He has voted for the bloated military budgets where billions of dollars cannot be accounted for.

He sure is fooling lots of sheep though...
 
Bernie likes the USA to militarily occupy most of the world. He has voted for the bloated military budgets where billions of dollars cannot be accounted for.

He sure is fooling lots of sheep though...
You just keep voting for yourself, we'll discuss real world candidates ;)
 
You just keep voting for yourself, we'll discuss real world candidates ;)

th
 
Clinton trying to snatch loss from the mouth of victory?

Does she think the President can override the 2nd AND the subsequent judgements of the Supreme Court on the matter?

I support gun laws that are effective but don't restrict the rights of law abiding, sane people to own them.
Snatch loss from the mouth of victory? I don't get it, but I have a little brain. The gun laws today are being skirted left and right , they do not work effectively, and there is stiff opposition to restrict the implementation of any further gun ownership laws. So the way things stand, as Jeb so eloquently stated, stuff happens, get used to it because that's life in America. But maybe it's time to reconsider what the 2nd Amendment means in todays America, and adjust accordingly. I mean it was once legal to own black people right? That was changed, why not that excuse to play army used by a bunch of dangerous imbeciles (At least most are it seems to me) So, lets start with Universal background checks, everywhere in this country and limit the ownership of weapons to people with an IQ above 60, and those that fail that standard would not be allowed to own a weapon, and must turn their guns in. That should eliminate 2/3 of the guns in America, and would be a good start.
 
We kill a fucking wedding party with a drone. 1 man kills 10 people and you call for more gun control... Yeah fuck that shit I liked Bernie but fuck democrats.
Why fuck Democrats, do you think they invented drones? Anyway, the phrase of the week seems to be stuff happens, so why should it not apply to weddings in Afghanistan and drones? I mean they seem to work ok most of the time.
 
Snatch loss from the mouth of victory? I don't get it, but I have a little brain. The gun laws today are being skirted left and right , they do not work effectively, and there is stiff opposition to restrict the implementation of any further gun ownership laws. So the way things stand, as Jeb so eloquently stated, stuff happens, get used to it because that's life in America. But maybe it's time to reconsider what the 2nd Amendment means in todays America, and adjust accordingly. I mean it was once legal to own black people right? That was changed, why not that excuse to play army used by a bunch of dangerous imbeciles (At least most are it seems to me) So, lets start with Universal background checks, everywhere in this country and limit the ownership of weapons to people with an IQ above 60, and those that fail that standard would not be allowed to own a weapon, and must turn their guns in. That should eliminate 2/3 of the guns in America, and would be a good start.
Snatching loss from the mouth of victory is a reversal of an old saying that basically states even tho shes winning she's still got plenty of space to fuck herself.
 
Why fuck Democrats, do you think they invented drones? Anyway, the phrase of the week seems to be stuff happens, so why should it not apply to weddings in Afghanistan and drones? I mean they seem to work ok most of the time.
Yes shit does happen democrats have killed more people with drones than Bush so them inventing a drone makes no difference. But 1 man killing 10 people with guns is no call to ban guns we have very strict gun control laws as is and any more gun control is uncalled for. Armed guards are the only option you outlaw guns they ain't going away and an armed guard will cost us tax payers less than police. Shit happens Muslim extremists took down many planes and the World Trade Center did we outlaw box cutters?? No, We put armed air marshalls on airplanes..... No good reason to ban guns!!

I like democrats on most other issues but will never vote for one trying to ban guns gun control is here they don't want gun control they want us to be like Australia!! Fuck that bullshit Hitler, Stalin and Mao took the guns ain't going to happen in my country.
 
Yes shit does happen democrats have killed more people with drones than Bush so them inventing a drone makes no difference. But 1 man killing 10 people with guns is no call to ban guns we have very strict gun control laws as is and any more gun control is uncalled for. Armed guards are the only option you outlaw guns they ain't going away and an armed guard will cost us tax payers less than police. Shit happens Muslim extremists took down many planes and the World Trade Center did we outlaw box cutters?? No, We put armed air marshalls on airplanes..... No good reason to ban guns!!

I like democrats on most other issues but will never vote for one trying to ban guns gun control is here they don't want gun control they want us to be like Australia!! Fuck that bullshit Hitler, Stalin and Mao took the guns ain't going to happen in my country.
You can legally own a semi auto AK in Australia.
 
Back
Top