DatSnoopKush
Member
Can someone tell me the requirements to get a green card in ontario, and if you aren't actually in medical need if there are any tricks?
Dude... that's low! REAL patients in Canada are having a hard enough time finding doctors... we don't need phonies like you making it even worse... shame on you!Can someone tell me the requirements to get a green card in ontario, and if you aren't actually in medical need if there are any tricks?
PROPS and agree 100%!This is what's wrong with the current program, it's so easy for phonies to get a card that it literally does make the rest of us look like criminals. This is a PRIME example of WHY harper is doing what he's doing, even tho I don't agree with it, one can certainly see ones reasoning when shit like this pops up...
Get out of here you disgrace.
i don't like the exclusivist attitude. why is it so common? can't you guys read between the lines?This is what's wrong with the current program, it's so easy for phonies to get a card that it literally does make the rest of us look like criminals. This is a PRIME example of WHY harper is doing what he's doing, even tho I don't agree with it, one can certainly see ones reasoning when shit like this pops up...
Get out of here you disgrace.
i disagree with this stronglyThis is what's wrong with the current program, it's so easy for phonies to get a card that it literally does make the rest of us look like criminals. This is a PRIME example of WHY harper is doing what he's doing, even tho I don't agree with it, one can certainly see ones reasoning when shit like this pops up...
Get out of here you disgrace.
Quite easy actually, there's a lawyer in BC who if you give him $1000-$2000 he'll hook you up with a doc who will sign off for you... otherwise, if you don't have that kind of money, which most don't, we're left out in the cold.How is it so easy for abusers to get a card , but someone like me with 3 class 2 conditions constantly is denied a signature?
Agree or disagree all you want, his core reason is most definitely what you are saying here, but don't think for a second he's not piggybacking the whole "Fueling organized crime" shit to gain public support.i disagree with this strongly
harper is passing the medical marijuana program onto corporations, aka his friends
there are plenty of ppl with oxycotin scripts that dont take oxycotin and have the script for the purpose of selling synthetic heroin <- herion distributed by our government btw
the program is going to turn meds i can produce myself at little or no cost into an expense that will funnel money into greedy corporations
i use marijuana for arthritis, the war on drugs makes otherwise law abiding citizens into criminals, not medical marijuana programs
take ur head out of ur ass
there is no reasoning with the capitalist harper government
california is a bad example because the medical marijuana program is state lawAgree or disagree all you want, his core reason is most definitely what you are saying here, but don't think for a second he's not piggybacking the whole "Fueling organized crime" shit to gain public support.
If you know anything about politics, which it seems you know at least a small amount, you'll know they come up with bullshit excuses to gain public support... and this is the one their using.
And if medical marijuana programs didn't make criminals out of law abiding citizens, then explain to me why even now, YEARS after the program began, most police are still uninformed, the courts get to throw out lots of cases, wasting tax dollars. I know it doesn't make a difference in Canada, but look at Hempsterdam in california, they sat there, raiding this medical community university... that was built around and abides by they laws set forth by california, simply because the federal government didn't agree.
You're confusing the current MMAR program with one that actually works... A fully functional, widely informed program will have next to none, if any, criminal offenses, meanwhile, with the program we currently have, lots of people are brought up on criminal charges.
It's the fact that this current program is a shitshow, a shitshow they made, that people abused, a shitshow that Harper seen a way to make money from should he get it reformed, and he used the programs abuse as a scapegoat to do it
california is a bad example because the medical marijuana program is state law
canada has a federal medical marijuana program, i've had my grow checked up on twice and i have not been arrested, i know my limit, and i play within it, <--------- and dont forget that your lisence is above provincial and regional police
this is what is called a transitional time, like when rosa parks wanted to sit at the front of the bus, there will be arrests, we need to deal with it and not plead guilty, ever
the only problem we currently face is our fraudulent government was elected in a false manner and funded by white collar criminals that plan on building enough prisons for 40% of our population, for reasons that almost all canadians disagree on
they are calling for minimum sentences of 9 months for more than 5 plants, and 14 days for fucking a minor
conservatives = pedofiles
i hate politics, i love horticulture
rosa parks is a great example, i will not buy my medicine from the government, and when they take away my personal production lisence i will blatantly break the rules, as all current MMAR holders shouldI do agree to a degree, it is a good example, because part of what got obama elected was the fact he said he was not going to get in the way of the medical programs different states had set out, several months later, they get raided.
The example is to show how politics work, they lie, and lie, and lie some more, they'll never tell you their real motive, and will make up a motive that fits everyones "endgame" goal as much as possible.
I agree completely with what you said in respect to the transition time, tho that does not excuse anyone IMO. As Canadians, we are not allowed to plead ignorance, because our laws are made publicly available to us, I believe this should hold doubly true for police. But using Rosa Parks is a VERY poor example, she blatantly broke the rules and refused to go to the back of the bus, this was no transition, this was flat out defiance that started a revolution. A MMAR card holder is not blatantly breaking the rules, and in fact, is trying to abide by them.
rosa parks is a great example, i will not buy my medicine from the government, and when they take away my personal production lisence i will blatantly break the rules, as all current MMAR holders should
i dont see the government trying to interfere with herbal medicine stores, why should marijuana be any different?
and dont plead ignorance, plead innocence
its proven we currently have a fraudulent government in power due to robocalls, therefore with the right judge, everything passed while they are in power is objectionable <-- i've already had this discussion with a friend who happens to be a lawyer
RIP canadian democracyThe Harper train is rolling on, run for cover.
regards,
its happening sooner than you think, and by no means am i saying the program isnt flawedI'm not disagreeing with you on this stuff by any means, but as it currently stands, with the program the way it is, using Rosa Parks as an example is very poor, as currently, and previously, the MMAR patients being charged with whatever offence, have been tried wrongfully (assuming they stayed in their respective limits). And I agree on the plead innocence thing as well. Once the MMAR program goes through this change, then Rosa Parks will be a valid example, until then, it's a very poor example to use when comparing to the current program.
I hope that everything harper does is undone, he's exactly as you made him out to be, but the problem is it does take the right judge, which as it happens, more and more seems to be looking at our plight with sympathetic eyes.