To start... I want to say I hit the like button for the post above me. I think that was an intelligent, factual post. Second, I'd also like to say that I too would be curious to see what the breeding veterans have to say (from their experiences) because unless you have a PHD I'm not going to believe you word for word anyways. Even if you do I still probably won't, unless everything you say I agree with. Remember even published science gets debated everday.
Now on to my thoughts when I first read the original post.
You've got to remember that as humans, what we refer to as inbreeding is 1/2 a phycological stigma. That phenomenom has been occuring since living organisms first developed and without it we probably wouldn't be here today. (It's the same thing for mutations, and anything else folks consider may "not normal". Diversity has been the key to the Earths biological success since day 1.)
But we're talking about inbreeding and now I mentioned diversity... sounds like I'm going off on a tangent. (But I'm really not.)
You have to remember that inbreeding preserves specific genes and the purpose of it in todays world is to retain deseriable features. Think of cats and dogs. I don't want to confuse the inbreeding of mammals and plants, because without a large knowledge on the subject - I'd wager that the undeseriable "consequences" of excessive inbreeding of plants are far less noticeable (or quickly noticeable) than mammals.
With that said however, consider breeding a random set of cats. Some will look like the mother, some will look like the father, some will look like a mix. (Usually) All however will have some traits of each parent, slightly noticeable - however for the most part you usually get the above. Now if you bred one of the kittens (one that looks like the mother) back with the mother (to try to perserve the deserable traits of the mother and the kitten that looks like her) you will yield more cats that look like each parent, however at least one will still look like the previous father on the surface. Not only that, but the previous fathers genes are still in the new kittens as well. Continue this process though and you will be able to breed out the father (at least superfically) and have mostly kittens with the mothers original traits... usually with nifity things brought out (as each generation gives the potential to unlock more hidden recessive traits that were always dominated out). Sometimes those traits are neat (like blue eyes on a human), sometimes theres reasons why genes were dominted out.
Like I said though, plants and mammals probably shouldn't be confused in the world of genetics. But I can't say that for sure.
If you did want to compare them - plants do produce a butt-load of pollen, which if it were like sperm, each piece would be carrying different genes.. and a lot more potential offspring at once than any mammal can. That's a lot of diversity. Remember even stable strains have phenotypes.
Bud
(Ps folks please correct me on anything. I'm not a cat breeder or scientist.
)