HPS v CFL

Richie Bud

Active Member
I am growing using 2 250 wat CFLs I was wondering how much better are HPS compared to CFLs they are not the small ones they are the large ones that are just for growing
I want to start using HPS lights but would like to know will the extra cost be worth it:joint:
any help will be greatly appreciated
 

Richie Bud

Active Member
Thanks mate I have decided to get the HPS for flowering and keep using the CFLs for veging I have to get my munys worth out of the CFLs
 

dyzel

Well-Known Member
If you consider that you are using 500Watts of energy to run the 2 CFLs, would it not make sense to get a 400W HPS?
 

sugarkush

New Member
HPS all the way, although cfl lights are good side/extra lights. Try getting a mh light for vegitative stage and then switch it to hps during flowering stage it will work like a charm.. my dad grew a plant under 1 cfl grow light and had a success full grow.. my last grow i had a 150w hps light with 5 26 watt cfl lights and i got the plant pretty dam big... smoke up and try new stuff my nig g a P.S listen to DYZEL he seems to know whatsup
 

purplehazin

Well-Known Member
You're doing it right. A lot of people, myself included, use 6500K CFL's for vegging and then switch to a HPS for flowering.
 

golddog

Well-Known Member
Guys, I use both.

My main flower area is under 400 watt HPS in a 3X4X7 ft grow box. I also have a 315 watt CFL Multi Spectrum Array which I have set up in a closet.

Under my 400 watt I put 4 plants and get a yield of 2.5 - 3.5 ounces per plant, trimmed dried and cured.

Under the 315 watt CFL's I can really only get 1 plant (might try 2 next time), last yield was 1.23 ounces trimmed and dried, still curing.

As you can see my yield is much lower with the CFL's. The bud was excellent and dense. Under the HPS it is a completely different story.

I use CFL's and Metal Halide to veg. I will continue to use the HPS to flower and throw a plant under the CFL array.

There are lot's of different methods to increasing your yield with CFL's, the only thing to increase yields under the HPS is just to veg them up to 24 inches.:weed:

just my $ 0.02
 

whietiger88101

New Member
I have personal used CFL's in one months time my plant grew to only one foot tall ! Under my new 400watt M.h. my other plants have grown to alomst two feet tall in one month 2 weeks. I keep m cfl's only because i paid for them. LOL
 

fourtwentychat

Well-Known Member
*Assuming CFLs for flowering with correct spectrum*

apples and oranges.
I agree with this guy. Specifically, what is needed is the most efficient setup for whatever resources are available. Some possible scenarios may include:
- space will only support small to medium heights
- heat is an issue (also impacted by space)
- noise is an issue (may run fan at a much lower setting...thus quieter)
- funds are moderately important (see below)
- the individual is not yet content with his "final design" plans
- looking to get started simple and ASAP (ready for initial action)
- somewhat new to the whole process

Assuming the above, for example, a *very* good setup absolutely exists - and could yield a lot more than most people seem to think).

A very efficient setup, for example, would be:
- the two 250W flowering CFLs mentioned
- two horizontal Bat-Wing style CFL reflectors (250W bulbs will not fit into the more classic looking CFL reflectors made by hydrofarm or sun, with the 200W CFLs being ok)
- 4" Fan/Filter combo
- 16 clones (8 per reflector) taken from same mother (to maintain consistent canopy)
- clones put into flower at same height of 5-6 inches
- focusing on just the tops, trimming lower branches if necessary (may or may not be)

This sea of green type style, in my opinion, is the most efficient design that uses the "big" type CFLs for flowering - the reflectors being necessary. Other sea of green type style variations are also quite acceptable: Ben's 4-top technique with maybe 4 clones per reflector instead of 8, screen of green, etc).

I guarantee that the outcome above would result in super dense and better than expected yields.

All that said, if there are no issues such as heat, space, funds, final design flaws, etc), then obviously HPS will be the most efficient (best yielding in this case) solution. This is the orange.
 

Anjinsan

Well-Known Member
Now that I've actually done both...you CAN get the same results from either...it just takes more work (adjustments) and more watts with cfl. But make no mistake...a good cfl grower will have dense buds.
 

HookdOnChronics

Well-Known Member
Maybe in your case; my CFL's yield dense "Swole" buds.
Dito!

Now that I've actually done both...you CAN get the same results from either...it just takes more work (adjustments) and more watts with cfl. But make no mistake...a good cfl grower will have dense buds.
Tru dat! Here's some CFL buds for ya'lls asses! :)

100% CFL lighting on every one of these buds. CFL's work, if you know how to use em. I am just now on my first HPS grow. Upgraded from 312w of CFL's, to now 575w HPS. Can't WAIT for this harvest! :)
 

Attachments

Top