being in an apt people will smell it.Being legal I would be strait up so you don't get evicted for legal growing.landlords don't care if it's legal.I called on many homes told them. none gave a shit.
That's generally right in houses, but not apartment complexes. You're better off NOT telling them. And I suggest that you don't.
Here's some info I found awhile back and saved. I DID NOT WRITE THIS, but found it a very good and well written answer to this very question.
I hate like heck to have to give you this
answer, because I believe strongly in Prop 215 and I don't think the
Feds have any business interfering in the State regulation of medical
treatment -- but your landlord is DEFINITELY at risk of forfeiting his
property, and as a result, has a legal right to forbid the cultivation
of cannabis on his property.
This is awful; it's wrong; but it's the state of the law right now.
Let me explain the details.
Federal law strictly forbids the cultivation of cannabis, whether for
sale, personal use, medical use, or whatever. It's forbidden by
Federal law, and that Federal law applies in California irrespective
of Prop 215. Federal law in this regard trumps State law -- and the
Supreme Court has recently upheld the Feds' right to do as they please
in this area.
Read the case of _Raich v. Gonzalez_ (2005) at
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06jun20051130/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-1454.pdf
and discussion at
http://www.canorml.org/news/raichdecision.htm
In _Raich_, two California medical marijuana patients sued after the
DEA raided their private homes and destroyed their medical cannabis.
There was no question that the two patients were in serious need of
cannabis; doctors testified that one of them was in such excruciating
pain without it that her life was in danger. DEA didn't care. The
Supreme Court held that the Federal law prohibiting cannabis
cultivation could be enforced in California, even in the face of Prop
215 expressly permitting it. So the Feds can still enforce ALL of the
Federal laws against cannabis cultivation, whether you have a State
permit or not.
One of those Federal laws allows the Feds to seize property that's
being used for cultivation. And yes -- the Feds have used it, and
seized property in California. More to your point, the Feds have
seized property that DID NOT BELONG to the cultivator, that belonged
to a landlord. The landlord LOST HIS PROPERTY because he allowed
medical cannabis to be grown.
"Another federal weapon against medical marijuana is property
forfeiture. Federal law allows the government to forfeit real estate
from owners or landlords who let it be used for marijuana distribution
or cultivation. The DEA successfully used forfeiture against the Los
Angeles Cannabis Resource Center in 2001. The LACRC's building was
actually owned by the city of West Hollywood, which had bought it as a
gift for the club. The government had no trouble taking possession of
it by means of forfeiture, effectively closing the LACRC. More
recently, the government invoked forfeiture to close the Capitol
Compassionate Care center in Roseville and to force a landlord to
evict another dispensary in West Hollywood. The DEA has threatened to
employ forfeiture more widely. So far, the chosen targets have mostly
been facilities that actively sought publicity through the media or
advertising. Dispensary operators are advised to operate discreetly
to avoid DEA attention."
http://www.canorml.org/prop/cbcbusinesstips.html
See
http://www.canorml.org/news/DEAraidslepp&roseville.html for a
description of a few of these raids. Note that the article was
written before the Supreme Court decision in _Raich_, and expresses
hope that the Supremes would find in favor of the cannabis patients so
there would be no more raids. Well, we now know how that turned out
-- so you can expect the DEA to be even MORE aggressive since they
have the Supreme Court's blessing.
See:
http://www.unknownnews.org/040910marijuana.html
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/can/press/html/2003_08_01_sasso.html
The Federal civil forfeiture statute is here:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode21/usc_sec_21_00000881----000-.html
It renders real property subject to forfeiture if it is "used, or
intended to be used" to commit any drug-related crime that is
punishable by more than a year in jail. Since Federal law makes
cultivation of cannabis a felony, punishable by 5 years to life
depending on amount, cultivation of cannabis is one of the acts that
renders real property subject to forfeiture.
There is such a thing as an "innocent owner" defense under the
forfeiture laws. But it would be the landlord's burden to prove, not
only that he himself was innocent, but also that he had either not
known about the cultivation, or that upon learning of the cultivation,
"did all that reasonably could be expected under the circumstances to
terminate such use of the property."
See:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000983----000-.html
Since this cultivation could result in the landlord's property being
seized by the Feds, he has the right to prohibit it. I'm very, very
sorry to have to tell you this. It's wrong, wrong, wrong -- but it's
the state of the law right now.
Best wishes, and if there's any more help I can give (yeah, like this
was a helpful answer), please just ask for clarification.