Judge Upholds Pot Ban

themistocles

Well-Known Member
This is an article from the OC Register front page today.

"SANTA ANA A federal judge has rejected a request by four Orange County medical marijuana patients for a temporary injunction preventing Lake Forest and Costa Mesa from shutting down marijuana dispensaries in their cities.
The four patients – Marla James, Wayne Washington, James Armantrout and Charles Daniel – argued through attorney Matthew Pappas that the Americans with Disabilities Act gave disabled people a federally protected right to use medical marijuana if such use is legal under state law and done with appropriate supervision.
The four were asking the court to temporarily prevent the cities from taking any further action against medical marijuana collectives; bar the cities from violating the rights of qualified people under the ADA; award damages for past actions in violation of the ADA; and award attorneys' fees.
Pappas argued his clients would suffer irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction against the cities.
U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Guilford, however, ruled in favor of the cities.
In his judgment filed Friday, he concluded: “At this stage, the court agrees with defendants. Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, and under that Act, it currently has no medical purpose.”
Pappas said he is reviewing the ruling and considering options. “We'll certainly consider appealing to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,” he said.
Jeffrey Dunn, attorney for the city of Lake Forest, said Judge Guilford's decision shows a careful analysis of the disabilities act.
“It concluded that the law does not allow the use of marijuana, an illegal drug, under federal law,” Dunn said.
Lake Forest Mayor Peter Herzog said he is pleased the judge sided with the cities and he sees it as an indication the state courts can proceed with their decisions.
“Essentially the whole purpose of this case was to stop the state courts and then they threw in the ADA, which has no merit,” Herzog said.
Lake Forest officials are awaiting a ruling on their request to shut down 11 dispensaries in that city.
In September, the city sued 35 people, including medical marijuana dispensary owners and retail landowners who rented space to them. Since then, several of the dispensaries have shut down, though 11 remain. The city is involved in several lawsuits targeting clusters of marijuana collectives based on their locations and ownership.
Shannon Saccullo, who owns Earth Cann Wellness Center, a medical marijuana collective in Lake Forest, was disappointed by the court's decision.
“This is a sad day where patients are only bound to Western medicine,” said Saccullo, who has drastically cut membership at her collective by not serving those patients who have medical marijuana cards issued by doctors who are under investigation.
“Marijuana is a natural substance,” she said. “It's sad that the judge hasn't educated himself on these healthful benefits.”
In Costa Mesa, there are about 10 to 15 dispensaries that are illegally operating, according to Deputy City Attorney Jim Touchstone. In 2005, the city put a zoning ordinance in place prohibiting them in the city.
“I'm pleased, and I expected that ruling,” said Costa Mesa City Attorney Kimberly Hall Barlow, who added that the city will continue to enforce its ordinance unless ordered otherwise by the council or the court. “I'm glad that the judge felt the way we thought.”
In February, Costa Mesa police began cracking down on dispensaries operating illegally in the city without proper business licenses. The city's police and code enforcement officers have given out cease-and-desist letters to shops, along with arresting some shop owners for marijuana sales and possession.
In response, two of the dispensaries that were ordered to shut down have filed a lawsuit alleging that Costa Mesa's ban is unconstitutional.
In a complaint filed April 19, Herban Elements Inc. and MedMar Patient Care Collective allege that the city of Costa Mesa's ordinance banning medical marijuana dispensaries conflicts with the state constitution and bars patients from accessing their medicine. "

Just thought I should spread the word out their to all the medical patient on the area.
 

cannapharm

Well-Known Member
WOW. Unbelievable. Your honor, did you not hear about the DEA memo? Check it out... Perhaps the next step should be removing Marijuana from "schedule I drug" category?
 

Detcord

Member
It does not surprise me, fkn lunatics that only get there info from TV they help let this stuff slide by not voting etc. Look at some of the Church belt in the USA cant buy or consume any alcohol beer wine hard stuff over the counter ie.. a dry county, but you sure as hell can knock on your neighbors door and buy some moon shine.
 

Cali chronic

Well-Known Member
so if I understand all this late in the day---the 215 ruling means nothing unless the 80 judges want it to? I am not trying to be ridiculous is it the dispensery or MJ store they do not want to accept?? I mean what or how do they expect someone to get their meds? Not everyone can grow it? The whole thing seems slippery to me. THe rule was past via 215 See the Dr choose anti-depress drug or pain killer that last for hours or days that they own stock in--- or Mj and yoga balanced diet (cause the MJ allows you to eat intstead of consitpation from pain killer or anti-depress leave you trippin and sippin and not eatin)
All right----sorry rant- so is it illegal or not to use Medical MJ under a DR's recommendation even after it was voted in 6 years ago?
stupid rednecks You know they use to burn people alive because they believed in witch craft???? Fuck me
 

MrBuds.com

New Member
This is so ridiculous the way a Federal Judge imposes federal will at the state and county levels. Marijuana is legal for medicinal purposes. And those rights not explicitly granted to the federal government are reserved for the states. Looks like the dispensaries might need to move from costa mesa and lake forest to another county. With legalization for recreational use on the ballots in Nov we will have to see how this will all play out.
 

sharon1

Active Member
Very true MrBuds.

I am disappointed in this ruling, and I am aprehensive about the damage this may do to defeat legalization in November.
I hope my fears wind up unfounded.
 
Top