Hi,
I have a couple questions regarding some driver choices. Sorry, for the kinda odd wording - copy/paste.
I'm contemplating and comparing QB96 Elite V2 versus QB288 V2 Rspec, in performance or output. As far as raw, total output (ppfd), I would guess the EliteV2 would put out more actual light energy than the Rspec, just because it can be run harder. Is that right?
1a) If they were both on the same power driver would there be much difference in output? Say, two Rspecs on a HLG-240 compared to two Elite V2s on an HLG-240 would be more or less the same?
1b) Also, I thought there was a mention as well that the Rspecs (a pair of them) can be run on a 320H driver, and/or at 2800mA (like a c2800), as they can take a little more than the previous 288 V2s.
I'm just curious as I like the idea of streamlining driver choices/"inventory".
2b) How does the 288 V2 Rspec board being rated at slightly higher voltage than previous V2 translate to driver choices when building two-board fixtures? Instead of the 240h-c2100, or the 240h-54, could you safely run two Rspecs on a 240h-c2800? Or what about a 320h-c2100?
I'm thinking the pair of QB96's have more potential, but ran at "recommended" levels I wonder how they compare (ppfd etc). The spectrum on the Rspec looks nice, more "full" blues. The Rspecs spectrum *appears* to be a slight "improvement" (or at least increase) in a couple of wavelength areas...?
Thanks.
I have a couple questions regarding some driver choices. Sorry, for the kinda odd wording - copy/paste.
I'm contemplating and comparing QB96 Elite V2 versus QB288 V2 Rspec, in performance or output. As far as raw, total output (ppfd), I would guess the EliteV2 would put out more actual light energy than the Rspec, just because it can be run harder. Is that right?
1a) If they were both on the same power driver would there be much difference in output? Say, two Rspecs on a HLG-240 compared to two Elite V2s on an HLG-240 would be more or less the same?
1b) Also, I thought there was a mention as well that the Rspecs (a pair of them) can be run on a 320H driver, and/or at 2800mA (like a c2800), as they can take a little more than the previous 288 V2s.
I'm just curious as I like the idea of streamlining driver choices/"inventory".
2b) How does the 288 V2 Rspec board being rated at slightly higher voltage than previous V2 translate to driver choices when building two-board fixtures? Instead of the 240h-c2100, or the 240h-54, could you safely run two Rspecs on a 240h-c2800? Or what about a 320h-c2100?
I'm thinking the pair of QB96's have more potential, but ran at "recommended" levels I wonder how they compare (ppfd etc). The spectrum on the Rspec looks nice, more "full" blues. The Rspecs spectrum *appears* to be a slight "improvement" (or at least increase) in a couple of wavelength areas...?
Thanks.