sparkdabud420
Member
Now if I read this correctly I am lead to believe that it isn't good for a plant to go all hermaphrodite on anyone, as this is a trait that would surly follow on to the subsequent generations.
At the same time it is common practice to make female plants produce pollen sacks and therefore making a hermaphrodite out of a perfectly good growing lady.
Here is my problem with this, if it is bad to get a female to hermie but we want to force a given female plant, however few branches we still force the female to make male pollen in essence forcing it to be a hermie.
This trait would then be passed down to the offspring of this plant, at least that is the way I see it in my head. So this is leading me to believe that all of the so-called female seeds produced would have this trait in them correct? Please help me to break this down as I am either on the correct path and am very worried about buying any female seeds, or I am over thinking this and there is nothing wrong with the forced production of pollen on a perfectly nice and blooming female.
At the same time it is common practice to make female plants produce pollen sacks and therefore making a hermaphrodite out of a perfectly good growing lady.
Here is my problem with this, if it is bad to get a female to hermie but we want to force a given female plant, however few branches we still force the female to make male pollen in essence forcing it to be a hermie.
This trait would then be passed down to the offspring of this plant, at least that is the way I see it in my head. So this is leading me to believe that all of the so-called female seeds produced would have this trait in them correct? Please help me to break this down as I am either on the correct path and am very worried about buying any female seeds, or I am over thinking this and there is nothing wrong with the forced production of pollen on a perfectly nice and blooming female.