Net Neutrality... No, really it will be faster and cheaper... Says the government.

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
FCC Chairman Proposes Utility-Like Regulation for Broadband
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler unveiled a proposal that would subject mobile and fixed broadband providers to utility-like regulations on how they treat traffic over their networks.

The proposed rules would change broadband Internet access from a lightly regulated information service to a more strictly overseen telecommunications service. The FCC would use that new authority to ban broadband providers from blocking, slowing down or speeding up specific websites in exchange for payment. The proposal is aimed at satisfying proponents of net neutrality.



What they dont tell you is that all the monitoring and reporting companies are now going to have to do to prove they are being *fair* will slow down the internet. So, to make sure it is fair for everyone the government is going to slow it down for everyone. In addition, shortly after or at the time the regulations are in place there will be a new bureacracy, a new tax, new expense, new compliance regulations, etc...

This is a huge pile of steaming bullshit. Internet providers should be able to do what they want with their infrastructure. There is no monopoly on the internet and as such the government should leave it the hell alone. Otherwise we are going to have Obamanet.... Free to those who want to get on and complain that their welfare check isnt big enough.
 
So bassackwards.

Only a republican would call a bill like this a measure to protect net neutrality. The same Tom Wheeler was at the forefront of the attack on net neutrality not long ago.
 
My radiologist has faster speeds for viewing data across town because he pays more than I do! That's not fair!
 
My radiologist has faster speeds for viewing data across town because he pays more than I do! That's not fair!
You fail to understand the issue at hand here, not regulating the Internet will turn it into a free for all. Ultimately it would stifle competition and tech companies so badly that it is a NET LOSS for the entire planet if it remains a non-utility.

Currently: broadband is unregulated, traffic flows freely to and from all sources at the same rate. Video traffic is the same importance as university data, same as emails. Everything is not priced according to the type of data, why would it be? All types of data require the same amount of ONs and OFFs, the electricity requirement is exactly the same bit for bit.

If things were allowed to be run by comcast:
All data could be priced according to an arbitrary number from someone's ass.

Massive additional fees will results in the inability of small business to have a web presence.

Not getting the Internet turned into a utility would be a nightmare for our economy.
 
Big brother is a voyeur. Fuck big brother.
He already has a copy from the NSA prisims in San Fransisco, and most other internet backbone sites. How would letting the FCC call them a utility enable them any more or less to spy on us?

They already violate our Consitution to get the information, another regulating entity won't increase or decrease that I suspect. Spies gonna spy, intelligence apparatuses are slippery and dangerous when they get out of hand.
 
You fail to understand the issue at hand here, not regulating the Internet will turn it into a free for all. Ultimately it would stifle competition and tech companies so badly that it is a NET LOSS for the entire planet if it remains a non-utility.

Currently: broadband is unregulated, traffic flows freely to and from all sources at the same rate. Video traffic is the same importance as university data, same as emails. Everything is not priced according to the type of data, why would it be? All types of data require the same amount of ONs and OFFs, the electricity requirement is exactly the same bit for bit.

If things were allowed to be run by comcast:
All data could be priced according to an arbitrary number from someone's ass.

Massive additional fees will results in the inability of small business to have a web presence.

Not getting the Internet turned into a utility would be a nightmare for our economy.

If comcast had local competition could they charge any number from someone's ass?

If we opened up the internet like we did with utilities (choices, woo hoo) would comcast still be able to charge whatever for whatever?

Are you old enough to remember when it cost 50cents a minute for a call to the other side of city when 50 cents was worth quite a bit more? What changed that? Was it that barriers to competition were lifted giving more choices with more competition for our business or did the government mandate how much to charge?
 
You fail to understand the issue at hand here, not regulating the Internet will turn it into a free for all. Ultimately it would stifle competition and tech companies so badly that it is a NET LOSS for the entire planet if it remains a non-utility.

Currently: broadband is unregulated, traffic flows freely to and from all sources at the same rate. Video traffic is the same importance as university data, same as emails. Everything is not priced according to the type of data, why would it be? All types of data require the same amount of ONs and OFFs, the electricity requirement is exactly the same bit for bit.

If things were allowed to be run by comcast:
All data could be priced according to an arbitrary number from someone's ass
.

Massive additional fees will results in the inability of small business to have a web presence.

Not getting the Internet turned into a utility would be a nightmare for our economy.

Even worse than that, comcast and the other ISPs would make it impossible for start ups to get any traffic thus limiting the choices for consumers to the big players who can fork over a mordida.
 
I'm actually mildly amazed that the government actually listened to the People on this one.

Now, if only we could get six million comments on something important, like getting our soldiers the Fuck out of unwinnable conflicts, or solving homelessness... or even holding the banks responsible for wrecking the economy.
 
I'm actually mildly amazed that the government actually listened to the People on this one.

Now, if only we could get six million comments on something important, like getting our soldiers the Fuck out of unwinnable conflicts, or solving homelessness... or even holding the banks responsible for wrecking the economy.
tty, i liked this post but I still think the government controlling the internet is a recipe for disaster no matter the intentions.

Opening up barriers to competition is the answer, the government is pretty famous for doing the opposite.
 
tty, i liked this post but I still think the government controlling the internet is a recipe for disaster no matter the intentions.

Opening up barriers to competition is the answer, the government is pretty famous for doing the opposite.

This does nothing to raise barriers to entry.
 
Knowing the history of our government and their business "sense", do you feel pretty confident they won't once they take over?

I get cheap water, electricity and gas, thanks to publicly regulated utilities. I'm thinking it should work out fine.

How would the opposite situation be better? Comcast has the worst reputation for customer service in business- and it's well deserved. The only reason those fuckers are still in business at all is because they're a monopoly and consumers have no choice. You're suggesting we continue with THAT model?
 
I get cheap water, electricity and gas, thanks to publicly regulated utilities. I'm thinking it should work out fine.

How would the opposite situation be better? Comcast has the worst reputation for customer service in business- and its well deserved. The only reason the fuckers are still in business at all is because they're a monopoly and consumers have no choice. You're suggesting we continue with THAT model?

Nope, I'm suggesting we treat cable companies the way we treated Ma Bell in the 80's and open the barriers to competition.

Comcast (and charter) get away with shitty service because they are protected to be the only game in town.
 
The problem is not at the consumer level. The problem is that the ISPs charge companies like Netflix an exorbitant fee for bandwidth in order to make content available to consumers.
 
Back
Top