New ruling on Nevada's MMJ
- Thread starter Moldy
- Start date
Doer
Well-Known Member
Because it doesn't provide for a means of distribution. So, good news.
"For example, according to the law, distributors could not receive compensation for medical marijuana, meaning they would have to grow and give away cannabis for free, according to Draskovich. The statute -- which conflicted with other state laws prohibiting marijuana possession and distribution -- also said distributors could possess only enough cannabis for one customer at a time."
So, MMJ is not challenged, it's supported.
"For example, according to the law, distributors could not receive compensation for medical marijuana, meaning they would have to grow and give away cannabis for free, according to Draskovich. The statute -- which conflicted with other state laws prohibiting marijuana possession and distribution -- also said distributors could possess only enough cannabis for one customer at a time."
So, MMJ is not challenged, it's supported.
sincitygrowJB
Active Member
yea they wont move on this any time soon would be great vif they did nice post thanks!!! JB
Moldy
Well-Known Member
And an update that is typical...
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/apr/20/applicants-line-replace-judges-donald-mosley-kathy/
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/apr/20/applicants-line-replace-judges-donald-mosley-kathy/
Similar threads
