Kludge
Well-Known Member
thats the most dumbass thing i heard.
You just wait, I'll say even dumber stuff if you give me half a chance.
*OMG!! Obama BOMBSHELL!!!!!!!!!
- Thread starter Big P
- Start date
You just wait, I'll say even dumber stuff if you give me half a chance.
Kludge
Well-Known Member
No shit! The SCOTUS is supposed to be non-partisan...
Big P
Well-Known Member
hey i just found this funny pic. lol looks like mccain is jokingly acting pissed that bush is kissing his wife
ZenMaster
Well-Known Member
I hope your joking heh
ViRedd
New Member
And which Justices would be "nonpartisan" ... those who legislate from the bench like Ginsberg, or those who are strict constitutionalists like Antonin Scalia?
Vi
tipsgnob
New Member
oh yeah...the constitution....that worn out rag the politicians have been wiping their asses with for years...we need to burn it and start over....
We TarDed is back!
https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/59853-christianity-has-been-debunked-once-60.html#post1327172
The REVOLUTION has begun!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/59853-christianity-has-been-debunked-once-60.html#post1327172
The REVOLUTION has begun!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
tipsgnob
New Member
whats up wetarded....
ViRedd
New Member
On the contrary ... we need to burn the politicians and dry-clean the Constitution, then start abiding by it.
Again, which Justices would be "nonpartisan" ... those who legislate from the bench like Ginsberg, or those who are strict constitutionalists like Antonin Scalia?
Vi
tipsgnob
New Member
you must have confused me with someone else...I don't want nonpartisan justices.....
Big P
Well-Known Member
Inneedofbuds
Well-Known Member
I swear to god, refuting lies has become a full time jobs in this forum. So, anyone ready for a dose of reality?
First off, what Obama propsed was a delay in negotiations until the new administration had been sworn in. You see, like many of us, he sees the current adminisration as a complete and total failure, so why would we want them involved in one of the biggest withrdawal negotions in history. I mean, doesn't it makes sense that something that is taking place in 2010 should be handled by the administration that will be there at the time? This is an easy way for Repubs to convince weak minded people that Obama wants to keep troops in Iraq. Do you need a reminder he voted against the war to begin with? The idea that delay of 3 months would make it impossible to withrawal troops by 2010 its just downright stupid. Oh, and Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari was appointed by the Bush Administration, like much of Iraq's new leadership.
First off, what Obama propsed was a delay in negotiations until the new administration had been sworn in. You see, like many of us, he sees the current adminisration as a complete and total failure, so why would we want them involved in one of the biggest withrdawal negotions in history. I mean, doesn't it makes sense that something that is taking place in 2010 should be handled by the administration that will be there at the time? This is an easy way for Repubs to convince weak minded people that Obama wants to keep troops in Iraq. Do you need a reminder he voted against the war to begin with? The idea that delay of 3 months would make it impossible to withrawal troops by 2010 its just downright stupid. Oh, and Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari was appointed by the Bush Administration, like much of Iraq's new leadership.
VTXDave
Well-Known Member
He voted against the Iraq Resolution?
natrone23
Well-Known Member
correction.......he never got to vote on the issue because he was not in the senate at the time. He did rally against the war calling it a "dumb war" from the very beginning and spoke out when much of America was beating there war drum
Inneedofbuds
Well-Known Member
yes, i apologize. He voted against funding the war, not the war itself.
Inneedofbuds
Well-Known Member
Ccodaine, he's against the war in Iraq. There is no arguing that. I made a mistake saying he voted against it when he voted against the funding, I hardly call that a lie. At least I can admit a mistake...........................
ccodiane
New Member
You've proven that, yes.