Our Case is really pretty simple

The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
I know there is are maybe a possible million legal pages to describe our case. But I wanted to summarize it as I see it and as simply as possible. Yes I'm biased but find it hard to argue this simple explanation.

Fair access...... this was granted long ago and firm. This doesn't need decided..already done.
High LP prices, does NOT equal fair access. LP's will never be able to supply you with the price it costs you to do it. That's not hard to see with their overheads.
Therefore taking home grows away from people goes against fair access.

So Judge Phellan if you cancel home grows, you go against fair access and what has already been decided.

Any decision to cancel home grows is clearly NOT following what your peers have already decided.
Respectfully I say this needs no consideration beyond that point.

Home grows just need tweaked...not cancelled.

Any other decision other than fixing home grows will be considered as a fixed pre-made Corporate driven mistake.
This is not complicated on the surface. The main point out trumps the others.
 
N

nobody important 666

Well-Known Member
The Hippy said:
I know there is are maybe a possible million legal pages to describe our case. But I wanted to summarize it as I see it and as simply as possible. Yes I'm biased but find it hard to argue this simple explanation.

Fair access...... this was granted long ago and firm. This doesn't need decided..already done.
High LP prices, does NOT equal fair access. LP's will never be able to supply you with the price it costs you to do it. That's not hard to see with their overheads.
Therefore taking home grows away from people goes against fair access.

So Judge Phellan if you cancel home grows, you go against fair access and what has already been decided.

Any decision to cancel home grows is clearly NOT following what your peers have already decided.
Respectfully I say this needs no consideration beyond that point.

Home grows just need tweaked...not cancelled.

Any other decision other than fixing home grows will be considered as a fixed pre-made Corporate driven mistake.
This is not complicated on the surface. The main point out trumps the others.
Click to expand...
What would you or others consider fair as far as plant counts. I know what I think would be fair but curious what everyone thinks.
 
torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
I know a bunch that produce their own beer at home without limit.
Click to expand...
I didn't even know u needed a permit. They sell kits at Walmart to make ur own at home but I hate beer so doesn't affect me at all.
I know making moonshine and certain liquor is still illegal.
 
N

nobody important 666

Well-Known Member
I remember some guy a while ago that was saying that limits should be based on wattage. Me personally i think the limit on anything (plants,wattage,sq foot etc) should be for flowering plants only and not count seedlings
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
torontoke said:
I didn't even know u needed a permit. They sell kits at Walmart to make ur own at home but I hate beer so doesn't affect me at all.
I know making moonshine and certain liquor is still illegal.
Click to expand...

Yeah I believe hard alcohol restrictions are much more severe but for good reason.
I'm not sure that a crappy beer would kill or blind you, and we know weed won't either. So IMO it should be like beer.

I don't really think we should be opening the door to plant count restrictions, because in all honesty we all know it's no worse than beer and may even be better for you depending how you use it.

So, push for real fairness, base it on beer, not spirits or some trumped up thought that would restrict plant counts for no other reason than to fill producers pockets or reap tax dollars.

It's no worse than beer, therefore there shouldn't be any extra restrictions in place for weed than is in place for beer.
 
torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
nobody important 666 said:
I remember some guy a while ago that was saying that limits should be based on wattage. Me personally i think the limit on anything (plants,wattage,sq foot etc) should be for flowering plants only and not count seedlings
Click to expand...
I think that was me. But it was more along the lines that a wattage or sq footage limit makes as much sense as plant counts.
No matter what they do I just hope the don't push remo and conroys beloved bloom box nonsense.

And vegging plants have to count or else everyone would be flowering out 10 foot monsters in 100 gallon pots every 60 days.
 
redi jedi

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
torontoke said:
I think that was me. But it was more along the lines that a wattage or sq footage limit makes as much sense as plant counts.
No matter what they do I just hope the don't push remo and conroys beloved bloom box nonsense.

And vegging plants have to count or else everyone would be flowering out 10 foot monsters in 100 gallon pots every 60 days.
Click to expand...
I dont see a problem with people growing 10 footers, but in reality nobody is going to grow one indoors unless they have the $$ and in that case it would be more practical to use more plants with much less veg time.
 
torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
redi jedi said:
I dont see a problem with people growing 10 footers, but in reality nobody is going to grow one indoors unless they have the $$ and in that case it would be more practical to use more plants with much less veg time.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree
Just playing devils advocate.
I think as mature responsible people we should be allowed to grow as many as we want. Wherever you want however you want.

However the only thing that matters less than what I think is what I want.
 
redi jedi

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
torontoke said:
I don't disagree
Just playing devils advocate.
I think as mature responsible people we should be allowed to grow as many as we want. Wherever you want however you want.

However the only thing that matters less than what I think is what I want.
Click to expand...
I hear ya,

If was going to make a suggestion, to those in charge. Ditch the medical system completly..let anyone grow what they want. If you want to sell it, get a license...and make the licensing system truly open to anyone...let the market dictate who succeeds or fails.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top