Senator Feinstein Rejects NY Times On Benghazi

B

beenthere

New Member
I'm willing to bet this scandal sticks to Hillary the Hag like glue.
Her words of " what difference does it make" will make a big difference, come 2016.




The chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said that key conclusions of a recent New York Times investigation into the 2012 Benghazi attack are wrong.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) rejected the Times’s conclusion that al Qaeda wasn’t responsible for the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. She also took issue with the notion that the Libya strike was sparked by a U.S.-made anti-Islam video online.

“I believe that groups loosely associated with al Qaeda were” involved in the attack, she told The Hill last week. “That’s my understanding.”She also disputed the notion that the Sept. 11, 2012, assault evolved from a protest against the video, which was widely disseminated by Islamic clerics shortly before the attack.
“It doesn’t jibe with me,” she said. http://thehill.com/blogs/global-aff...rica/195327-feinstein-rejects-nyt-on-benghazi



​

​
 
I hope it comes back to haunt this bitch. Her history of lying and deception may make her a suitable candidate, but her bullshit has become so transparent it's sickening. The Clinton name these days is reminiscent of herpes; especially the baggage associated with it. Cue the morons who claim Benghazi is but manufactured outrage aimed at a black president.

I'll take the word over a retired navy seal and army airborne/ranger any day;

As we have always maintained, the true reason for the Benghazi attack was because of these targeted killings. There was one assassination in particular, probably in the first week of September, in which a CIA asset was killed. Imagine the perspective of a Libyan militia – they felt that they were helping out the Americans by talking to the CIA. Then the U.S. military has their guy killed. In response, they launch an assault on the State Department compound which was successful far beyond their hopes because of grossly inadequate security. Emboldened by their success, they rally and bring the fight to the CIA compound, kill two more Americans and critically wound two more agents (one CIA, and one State).

Worse still, is the fact that one of the five principle suspects that the FBI has identified was someone with whom the U.S. government had an interesting quid pro quo relationship. The White House has no desire to bring these suspects to justice. They prefer them dead via drone strike or JSOC hit squad. If the FBI were to capture the Benghazi suspects it would put the White House in a bad situation. These suspects would be sure to talk about their past relationships with clandestine U.S. groups like the CIA, and in a legal setting this would have Washington pundits squirming in their seats. These are dead men walking for the same reasons UBL was certain to be killed, not captured, in Pakistan.

Ambassador Stevens knew full well how dangerous Benghazi was, but he never could have seen the retaliation coming in response to Special Operations strikes that he was unaware of in such a short time on the ground. Think this sort of thing doesn’t happen? The Department of Defense no longer has to notify the CIA or State Department about many of its activities.

The world is a dangerous place, but thankfully it’s filled with great people like Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, Ty Woods, and the other Americans who helped that day. They were willing to go into harm’s way and face great danger in order to make a difference for the Free World.

Benghazi is important because it highlights a failed U.S. Foreign Policy strategy, and the failed practice of Limited War. You only have to look to Afghanistan and Somalia to ground this statement.
Click to expand...

http://sofrep.com/22460/ambassador-chris-stevens-benghazi-diary/#ixzz2qS1sCQdX
 
Do you really think our liberal media will do anything that might reflect poorly on mrs. Clinton during a general election?

Her or any other democrat.
 
BigNBushy said:
Do you really think our liberal media will do anything that might reflect poorly on mrs. Clinton during a general election?

Her or any other democrat.
Click to expand...

that NY times bullshit was nothing but a political posturing piece, far from unbiased journalism, devoid of fact and IMO those individuals who lost their lives would be Turing in their graves
 
Hello and thank you for calling.......Please wait, your democratic party will be here shortly to tell you how sexist and racist you are. If at any moment during this call you feel the need to put a democrat in their place, take a deep breath and remember that you will be reported. Thank you and have a blessed day.


~Message 2 BNA~
 
SirGreenThumb said:
Hello and thank you for calling.......Please wait, your democratic party will be here shortly to tell you how sexist and racist you are. If at any moment during this call you feel the need to put a democrat in their place, take a deep breath and remember that you will be reported. Thank you and have a blessed day.


~Message 2 BNA~
Click to expand...

Ain't that the frikin truth.
 
beenthere said:
Hillary the Hag
Click to expand...

echelon1k1 said:
this bitch
Click to expand...

benghazi-bush-60-dead_0.jpg
 
UncleBuck said:
benghazi-bush-60-dead_0.jpg
Click to expand...

How many times have you posted that exact picture on this forum? I can remember at least 5 separate occasions to date and you've yet to make a point as predicted.

The group responsible staged similar attacks on at least 2 occasions in the previous year on the Benghazi compound. The precedent and threat was there and still State, under Clinton, did nothing about additional security. Obama also stood down military assets during the attacks on 11/11/12 and should be held responsible as commander in chief.

it's a pity you don't have a UN report you could cite...
 
UncleBuck said:
benghazi-bush-60-dead_0.jpg
Click to expand...

Show a graph showing how many of those embassys or consulates were under attack for hours and ZERO effort was made to attempt rescue.

Show a graph at how many had a cover-up afterwards to distract public from the fact that no effort was made to save the American lives inside.

Show a graph depicting how many us diplomatic outposts were overrun and all staff was killed and tortured.

Show a graph depicting how many times bush, through underlings, lied to the American people, and in fact, blamed the attack on the actions of some americans.

Show a graph telling us how many of the attacked embassies had been deemed insufficient and needed increased security, yet it never came.

Those are red herrings buck, but then again intellectual honesty never was your strong suit.
 
echelon1k1 said:
How many times have you posted that exact picture on this forum? I can remember at least 5 separate occasions to date and you've yet to make a point as predicted.

The group responsible staged similar attacks on at least 2 occasions in the previous year on the Benghazi compound. The precedent and threat was there and still State, under Clinton, did nothing about additional security. Obama also stood down military assets during the attacks on 11/11/12 and should be held responsible as commander in chief.

it's a pity you don't have a UN report you could cite...
Click to expand...

Obama_on_Coke_pupj8i.png
 
BigNBushy said:
Show a graph showing how many of those embassys or consulates were under attack for hours and ZERO effort was made to attempt rescue.

Show a graph at how many had a cover-up afterwards to distract public from the fact that no effort was made to save the American lives inside.

Show a graph depicting how many us diplomatic outposts were overrun and all staff was killed and tortured.

Show a graph depicting how many times bush, through underlings, lied to the American people, and in fact, blamed the attack on the actions of some americans.

Show a graph telling us how many of the attacked embassies had been deemed insufficient and needed increased security, yet it never came.

Those are red herrings buck, but then again intellectual honesty never was your strong suit.
Click to expand...

3qwc8j.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

squarepush3r
Tulsi Gabbard Pushes No War Agenda – and the Media Is out to Kill Her Chances
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
hanimmal
hanimmal
rollinbud
Four More Years? Of This?
Replies
15
Views
2K
canndo
canndo
canndo
A small list of FOX lies and methods of distortions - for BeenThere.
3 4 5
Replies
96
Views
6K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
deprave
  • Locked
O-Baaaaaaaaa-maaaaaaaaaaaa!
4 5 6
Replies
118
Views
7K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
kendothegreenwizard
  • Poll Poll
Bill targets citizenship of terrorist allies
Replies
14
Views
1K
kendothegreenwizard
kendothegreenwizard
Back
Top