The thing is though man.... cannabis isn't a "taproot" plant, (monocot)Ok so obviously wordy explanations don't work here so I'll try to make it easy.
Every seed has 1 taproot and 1 main cola.
Topping coverts energy from the primary cola and converts its energy to all of the branches/secondary colas. Hence evening out the distribution of power and your canopy.
Clones never have a taproot, nor true primary cola, that is why their growth is not symmetrical, like seeds.
While clones give uniformity and you know what to expect, The mother plant that was from seed will always grow more vigorously than any clone taken from it because it does not have a taproot. ( under the same conditions.)
Clones are great. Thy just don't truly produce more than their seed counterparts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not always identical. But yes clones are genetically identical to the mother, but will never have a taproot like the mother and variations of expression of its genetics can happen. There are a ton of different alluring things about clones. They're great, I haven't said they aren't. Uniformity and knowing what to expect is good. And on longer taproots, yes I have had 2' taproots outdoors, and the taproot in my dwc grows in a spiral in the rez pots.The thing is though man.... cannabis isn't a "taproot" plant, (monocot)
those are carrots, radishes and the like.
Cannibis is a fibrous rooting plant (dicot)
The "taproot" is irrelevant.
After harvest pull the roots out, does the "taproot" go further than maybe two or three inches down?
Nope. that's a fibrous root system man, and that's why cannabis suffers so much during droughts and can take up so much food at once, that's why people get big ass harvests, because the root system is a fibrous type, not a taproot. that's totally different man.
Google monocot vs dicot roots, and their differences.
In fact the way they decipher between the two is based on the..... (copied)
Number of cotyledons -- The number of cotyledons found in the embryo is the actual basis for distinguishing the two classes of angiosperms, and is the source of the names Monocotyledonae ("one cotyledon") and Dicotyledonae ("two cotyledons"). The cotyledons are the "seed leaves" produced by the embryo. They serve to absorb nutrients packaged in the seed, until the seedling is able to produce its first true leaves and begin photosynthesis.
And DNA is DNA... a clone is the same as the mother.
that's a fact, the dna doesn't change when you clone, hence the whole allure of cloning.
So now pot plants don't have a tap root?.....lolThe thing is though man.... cannabis isn't a "taproot" plant, (monocot)
those are carrots, radishes and the like.
Cannibis is a fibrous rooting plant (dicot)
The "taproot" is irrelevant.
After harvest pull the roots out, does the "taproot" go further than maybe two or three inches down?
Nope. that's a fibrous root system man, and that's why cannabis suffers so much during droughts and can take up so much food at once, that's why people get big ass harvests, because the root system is a fibrous type, not a taproot. that's totally different man.
Google monocot vs dicot roots, and their differences.
In fact the way they decipher between the two is based on the..... (copied)
Number of cotyledons -- The number of cotyledons found in the embryo is the actual basis for distinguishing the two classes of angiosperms, and is the source of the names Monocotyledonae ("one cotyledon") and Dicotyledonae ("two cotyledons"). The cotyledons are the "seed leaves" produced by the embryo. They serve to absorb nutrients packaged in the seed, until the seedling is able to produce its first true leaves and begin photosynthesis.
And DNA is DNA... a clone is the same as the mother.
that's a fact, the dna doesn't change when you clone, hence the whole allure of cloning.
not in the sense that he is thinking, no.So now pot plants don't have a tap root?.....lol
I've been telling all of you for years your smart pots are retarded....... Plastic squares are the only way that makes sense
I started skimming when I seen people arguing whether marijuana has a tap root and that clones yield better than plats from seed..... Went crazy town in herenot in the sense that he is thinking, no.
They are not a monocot root system.
They are dicots.
I've never in my life had a taproot in the center of my containers.
Which of these look familiar?I started skimming when I seen people arguing whether marijuana has a tap root and that clones yield better than plats from seed..... Went crazy town in here
Plants from seed do have a tap root..... Clones don't
Smart pots are retarded
well since clones are garbage and there isn't a "taproot" i'd say that, my dear sir, is complete schwag..And these are clones of clones for 5 years and if these aren't colas what are they.View attachment 3565058
What is a bluematI have run 15 gallon geopots with blumat drippers and love it. Next room is 25 or 30 gallon geopots with at least blumats. Might go up a notch in automation, however
Which of these look familiar?
Which does your root system look like after harvesting?
View attachment 3565057[/QUOT
It is a fiberous root all the way in a smart pot post mortem. I'll be doing my 3 gal plastic within a week and I'll post pics of the difference If there is any
it's a watering system that drips consistent moisture amounts.What is a bluemat
ahh that's an interesting theory, I had the opposite idea regarding UV that could damage DNA...I've had a theory for years that it may be possible for the phenotype to wander thru subsequent generations. You hear this mentioned from time to time. If it occurs, it could be due to lack of UV. More anecdotal info suggests placing the mother or clone in sunlight re-sets the pheno display.
Just a theory
15 generations of cloning? or a F15?UV had been shown to trigger some gene expression, so lack of UV arguably could suppress an expression maybe.
There are sooo many mechanisms for DNA repair from UV ( and other) that I would think any pheno wandering would be due to something getting turned off.
I can't recall someone saying that the smoke was better after 15 generations, only discussions of how the plant went to shit... It lost something... Hence my thought that something subtle was turned off. Maybe a gene for some flavonoid or turpene. Or the ratio of THC / CBD, etc