This is it ladies and Gentlemen - Ron Paul Minneapolis, MN - Rally to the Whitehouse

Parker

Well-Known Member
every ron paul supporter here believes it because i presented factual evidence of it.
more lies You have presented NO factual evidence. You cannot even directly answer any questions or statements ive asked of you except with someone said so.

there is video, there is an article which ron paul tells you to read in that video, the article is legit.
I've seen the vid you douchebag. what you say didn't happen because you're a serial liar.


wipe the sand out of your vagina, old man.
Pull your head out of your ass you little twat your boyfriend has something he wants to stick in there instead.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
oh, parker.

this is so sad, but it's been a long time in the making.
oh Uncle Buck you're a trolling liar and have been one for a long time

Show proof Ron Paul knew about the articles WHEN they were written. Put up or shut up time boy.
You wont because you cannot. So you'll deflect and deny like a coward does when he cannot admit he is wrong.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
What made the statements in the publication even more puzzling was that, in four terms as a U. S. congressman and one presidential race, Paul had never uttered anything remotely like this.

When I ask him why, he pauses for a moment, then says, “I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around. I think the one on Barbara Jordan was the saddest thing, because Barbara and I served together and actually she was a delightful lady.” Paul says that item ended up there because “we wanted to do something on affirmative action, and it ended up in the newsletter and became personalized. I never personalize anything.”

His reasons for keeping this a secret are harder to understand: “They were never my words, but I had some moral responsibility for them . . . I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly, but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing. ‘It appeared in your letter and your name was on that letter and therefore you have to live with it.’” It is a measure of his stubbornness, determination, and ultimately his contrarian nature that, until this surprising volte-face in our interview, he had never shared this secret. It seems, in retrospect, that it would have been far, far easier to have told the truth at the time.

 

Parker

Well-Known Member
i never claimed that ron paul actually wrote the racist newsletters or agrees with them, i simply claimed that he defended the racist newsletters as his own writing, true or not. that he defended them is inarguably true.

even ron paul admits it.
this shows what a complete douchebag you are. you believe he didnt write them but its his writings. Thats the same thing.

of course one post you say you dont believe he's racist while in another post you call him a racist.
Like I said you're a liar who can't keep his story straight and you don't make sense. You're a horrible troll.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Show proof Ron Paul knew about the articles WHEN they were written.
that was never my claim. my claim was that he simply defended them in 1996 as his own writing.

now, i can not prove he knew about the articles when the were written, but i have some disputable evidence towards that end. a former campaign person has said that ron paul personally approved each one or something to that effect, but the story i hear is that the guy who says that quit the campaign or got fired and there is some bad blood. that is as much as evidence as i have found so far that he might have known about what was in the newsletters as they were published.

i forget the name of the person who said this but i could look it up if it pleases you.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
this shows what a complete douchebag you are. you believe he didnt write them but its his writings. Thats the same thing.
no, you misread or purposely omitted what i said.

i said that i don't believe that he wrote them, but i know he defended them as his writings. defending them as his writing is not the same as "it's his writings", it was a political move and a failure of one at that (it was successful at the time, as he gained reelection, but came back to bite him in the ass later on).

of course one post you say you dont believe he's racist while in another post you call him a racist.
yeah, i like to selectively call him a racist just to piss people off, seems to work pretty well. which makes me anything but a horrible troll.
 

j.GrEeN.<,{'^'},>

Active Member
oh Uncle Buck you're a trolling liar and have been one for a long time

Show proof Ron Paul knew about the articles WHEN they were written. Put up or shut up time boy.
You wont because you cannot. So you'll deflect and deny like a coward does when he cannot admit he is wrong.
What made the statements in the publication even more puzzling was that, in four terms as a U. S. congressman and one presidential race, Paul had never uttered anything remotely like this.

When I ask him why, he pauses for a moment, then says, “I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around. I think the one on Barbara Jordan was the saddest thing, because Barbara and I served together and actually she was a delightful lady.” Paul says that item ended up there because “we wanted to do something on affirmative action, and it ended up in the newsletter and became personalized. I never personalize anything.”

His reasons for keeping this a secret are harder to understand: “They were never my words, but I had some moral responsibility for them . . . I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly, but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing. ‘It appeared in your letter and your name was on that letter and therefore you have to live with it.’” It is a measure of his stubbornness, determination, and ultimately his contrarian nature that, until this surprising volte-face in our interview, he had never shared this secret. It seems, in retrospect, that it would have been far, far easier to have told the truth at the time.

this shows what a complete douchebag you are. you believe he didnt write them but its his writings. Thats the same thing.

of course one post you say you dont believe he's racist while in another post you call him a racist.
Like I said you're a liar who can't keep his story straight and you don't make sense. You're a horrible troll.
****LIKEx3****

Keep fighting the good fight my friend!! As futile as it may seem at times:wall:................................TRUTHand HONESTY, WILL ALWAYS WIN. :clap: IN THE BEGINNING AND IN THE END!!:hump: UncleBuck will no doubt, continue to LIE, MANIPULATE, and CONSTRUE. after all it seems to be his nature, and as she himself has stated multiple times, "his job"kiss-ass aswell.

:peace::leaf:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
****LIKEx3****

Keep fighting the good fight my friend!! As futile as it may seem at times:wall:................................TRUTHand HONESTY, WILL ALWAYS WIN. :clap: IN THE BEGINNING AND IN THE END!!:hump: UncleBuck will no doubt, continue to LIE, MANIPULATE, and CONSTRUE. after all it seems to be his nature, and as she himself has stated multiple times, "his job"kiss-ass aswell.

:peace::leaf:
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
that was never my claim. my claim was that he simply defended them in 1996 as his own writing.

now, i can not prove he knew about the articles when the were written, but i have some disputable evidence towards that end. a former campaign person has said that ron paul personally approved each one or something to that effect, but the story i hear is that the guy who says that quit the campaign or got fired and there is some bad blood. that is as much as evidence as i have found so far that he might have known about what was in the newsletters as they were published.

i forget the name of the person who said this but i could look it up if it pleases you.
You might be mixing up two people. One Dondero the disgrunted mentally unstable fired aide. The "libertarian" who ended up choosing Giuliani. Thats like a vegan pushing for meat to be eaten.
Another, a woman, said she saw Ron Paul at the "office" every day when in fact he was involved with the day to day activities of being a doctor. He had his OB-GYN practice and in no way could physically be at both places at the same time. If others saw him there why havent they spoken up?

Quit giving credence to the mentally unstable and 16 year olds.
 
Top