Bulletproof_Love
Well-Known Member
Totally a sound argument.
Protesting some thing the government does is constitutional.
Administrators can't deem pot leafs (4/20's, joints, etc.) to be inappropriate due to dogmatic claims based on fear and fallacious information that was provided by government officials through propaganda by Harry Anslinger and Randolph Hearst.
1st amendment.
I'm baked, but I regret not speaking up against anybody when they were telling us to take off our weed clothse and stuff.
Protesting some thing the government does is constitutional.
Administrators can't deem pot leafs (4/20's, joints, etc.) to be inappropriate due to dogmatic claims based on fear and fallacious information that was provided by government officials through propaganda by Harry Anslinger and Randolph Hearst.
1st amendment.
I'm baked, but I regret not speaking up against anybody when they were telling us to take off our weed clothse and stuff.
