What if Ron Paul took intellectual steriods?
- Thread starter ViRedd
- Start date
mockingbird131313
Well-Known Member
Vi ole pal, Ron Paul is a long shot for president. Alan Keyes is something more, like a moon shot.
He would make a great running mate though. But two southerners on the same ticket? Aint happenin. Secretary of State, or Secretary of Labor might work out?
Just so we all understand, at this point in the election-cycle, Ron Paul has more support than Jimmy Carter or Howard Dean had. Probably about the same level of name recognition as Bubba Clinton had. So long shots do come home to roost.
He would make a great running mate though. But two southerners on the same ticket? Aint happenin. Secretary of State, or Secretary of Labor might work out?
Just so we all understand, at this point in the election-cycle, Ron Paul has more support than Jimmy Carter or Howard Dean had. Probably about the same level of name recognition as Bubba Clinton had. So long shots do come home to roost.
smokinjs
Well-Known Member
lol...this reminds me...
last nite i was over at my parents house for dinner and we all got on the subject of politics and the upcoming election. they were discussing hilary adn that muslim guy.
i mentioned ron paul and how i liked alot of his views. no one said a word just looked at me. with eyes that were saying "are you serious" . i just stuck my fist in the air and was like " ron paul baby, yeahhh!!!" hahaha..i thought it was funny. obviously their not as interested as i am on ending the war on drugs........
last nite i was over at my parents house for dinner and we all got on the subject of politics and the upcoming election. they were discussing hilary adn that muslim guy.
i mentioned ron paul and how i liked alot of his views. no one said a word just looked at me. with eyes that were saying "are you serious" . i just stuck my fist in the air and was like " ron paul baby, yeahhh!!!" hahaha..i thought it was funny. obviously their not as interested as i am on ending the war on drugs........
iblazethatkush
Well-Known Member
That would be awesome. That would be an ideal Prez/V.P. combo. Maybe they could even steal some of the minority vote with Keyes on the ticket.
mockingbird131313
Well-Known Member
"that muslim guy?" ... ~lol~ I got a laugh out of that one. He'll probably end up as Hillarious's running mate.
Vi, that aint happenin.
In every election cycle a small percentage of voters come out to vote against a candidate. According to Dick Morris, the last time I heard him mention this point, Hillda-beast is approach a 30 percent hate factor. The muslim guy is probably close to 20 pecent.
Hill's only chance is with the gal vote. Obama's only chance is the Oprah factor. Some pollsters speculate their gains help offset their losses in these strategies. Net result, probably zero.
The dems best chance this election cycle may be John Edwards, because he would likely pull votes from some republicans and independents.
Short answer, Hill and Obama together cannot reach a plurality. Seperately, with good running mates, perhaps.
Play this game with the repubs. Who would work out for Rudy as a running mate. That creates some wierd combos.
Vi, that aint happenin.
In every election cycle a small percentage of voters come out to vote against a candidate. According to Dick Morris, the last time I heard him mention this point, Hillda-beast is approach a 30 percent hate factor. The muslim guy is probably close to 20 pecent.
Hill's only chance is with the gal vote. Obama's only chance is the Oprah factor. Some pollsters speculate their gains help offset their losses in these strategies. Net result, probably zero.
The dems best chance this election cycle may be John Edwards, because he would likely pull votes from some republicans and independents.
Short answer, Hill and Obama together cannot reach a plurality. Seperately, with good running mates, perhaps.
Play this game with the repubs. Who would work out for Rudy as a running mate. That creates some wierd combos.
closet.cult
New Member
Intellectual Steriods turns people black? 
ViRedd
New Member
~lol~ ... good one, closet.Intellectual Steriods turns people black?
Here's something that's not being discussed in the Main Stream Media: The general consensus among the arrogant, left-wing outlets, is that Hillatoses is a shoe-in for the presidency ... or at least that some Democrat candidate will win. Take a look at the candidates. Who was the last president voted into office who came from the ranks of the senate? The present congress has an approval rating of about 12%. That includes the senate. Who among the Democrat candidates are setting themselves apart from the rest? No one ... They are all talking the very same game.
What's to keep the Republicans from taking back both the House and the Senate ... and taking the White House as well? Just a little food for thought.
Vi
ViRedd
New Member
I agree, but I'd rather see Keyes as President and Ron Paul as VP. The reason is, Alan Keyes is so much more articulate than Ron Paul in getting his points across. They both want the same things for the country, and IMHO, would make an awesome duo.
They both agree that we have a slave tax system. They both agree that the federal government is WAY to bloated and want to do away with all of the unconstitutional agencies. They both realize the benefits of honest money. They are both devotees of liberty and freedom. They both know who Adam Smith was. Sounds about right to me.
Vi
medicineman
New Member
They both agree this a rich mans country and fuck the poor.I agree, but I'd rather see Keyes as President and Ron Paul as VP. The reason is, Alan Keyes is so much more articulate than Ron Paul in getting his points across. They both want the same things for the country, and IMHO, would make an awesome duo.
They both agree that we have a slave tax system. They both agree that the federal government is WAY to bloated and want to do away with all of the unconstitutional agencies. They both realize the benefits of honest money. They are both devotees of liberty and freedom. They both know who Adam Smith was. Sounds about right to me.
Vi
threatlevelorange
Well-Known Member
Marx....give it up already. No one even believes that crap any more. Its a rich man's country for as long as communism isn't in full swing. No one is fucking me...so quit your meandering.
Acts like he knows what the ghetto is like...meh! Oh thats right...the ghetto of Henderson, NV BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
ViRedd
New Member
Dude, you have a one-note horn. I'm gonna put you to the test: Post ANYTHING you can find where either Keyes or Paul has supported the "rich" only, then follow you assertions up by posting ANYTHING where either one has said anything close to "fuck the poor."
I'll be awaiting your response with baited breath, O' MedicineDude.
Vi
medicineman
New Member
Henderson was quite a different place in the 50s and 60s, just goes to prove what you really know.
threatlevelorange
Well-Known Member
I wasn't even aware that he was running...
threatlevelorange
Well-Known Member
I didn't know Henderson even existed back then. As far as I know, it was called Las Vegas. Tough town.
threatlevelorange
Well-Known Member
I don't know enough about Keyes. I am willing to bet $5k that Marx spends the rest of his life digging up dirt on Ron Paul's economic policies and comes up empty-handed.
If Ron Paul ran as a Democrat, I would vote for him. That's how crazy smart this guy is. Since he is a Republican, Marx has to toot his horn on the whole "fuck the poor" thing. Sorry for barking at you, Marx. It just gets really irritating when the only candidate that wants me to be a CEO one day...gets shot down by a communist JUST because he is running as a Republican.
medicineman
New Member
Do you actually think they'd be that stupid to associate with that postulate in writing, get real. The facts are still the same. the benefactors of either of their policies would be the wealthy. Privatization most assuredly helps those in the plutocracy way more than the workers. It's a cold hard fact, use that common sense that you claim to have, get off the political bandwagon and take a look at who they really help with their policies, the people with money to invest in businesses. Don't go on about all the workers they would employ, they would reap the lions share of any enterprise, thus helping the wealthy, common sense 1-A. (Employ; Make use of) (Capitalism: the exploitation of workers by those with capital)
threatlevelorange
Well-Known Member
I suppose if you get rich while serving the consumer... you must have tricked them into handing over more money than they thought. No, wait. Hypnotism. No mind control...yea yea mind control. They use mind control to make you work for a wage that is less than what they make as the risk-takers.