bobbypyn
Well-Known Member
...and why? here's what I'm thinking; if LEDs are more eficient due to the many points of light, then why wouldn't an array of 150 HPS lamps be the most efficient? Logic would dictate that the more points of distribution you have, the better, due to lack of bright spots and reduction of shadows, yet everybody claims 600s are the best. why? I think i can get more with four 150s than a single 600 watter. will somebody please tell me why I'm wrong about this?
:there is no shrug smiley:
:there is no shrug smiley: