If they are 10 week autos they are done.
Well, if they were truly "done" the original poster would be asking about how to cure his plants, not why he doesn't have any buds on them!
The fact that they've been showing sex for six weeks under 20/4 lighting without making huge buds just shows that the plants in question aren't truly autoflowering. Again, not every plant advertised as "autoflowering" actually is.
Most autos nowadays are genetically engineered to grow under a 20/4 light schedule. Don't switch to 12/12 for autos.
While its true that you shouldn't need to run 12/12 for autos, and there is good reason not to, I think we've already established that in this case, the strain in question probably isn't really an auto, and
in this case, 12-12 is probably advisable to force flowering.
On the rest of this, autoflowers aren't truly "genetically engineered" in the sense that their genetics have been manipulated in vitro using molecular microbiology techniques. Leaving out the discussion of why you might want to do this, or if its even practical with current technology, I don't think there are any commercially available strains where this is true.
So far as I know, all of these plants are bred in the conventional way by crossing Mommy and Daddy plants, at least one of which has some autoflowering
C. Ruderalis genes in it, using conventional pollenization techniques, the same as any other plant.
Again, so far as I know, none of these plants have been selected specifically to perform best under 20-4 lighting; that's just a number that many people have decided via experience seems to work the best for them. Some growers claim 24-0 is the best for their autoflowers.