When should I start flowering?

zem

zem

Well-Known Member
since 4x4 is the same as 5x5, then 5x5 is the same as 6x6, therefore 4x4 is the same as 6x6, there is not much difference if any, then im goin with 6x6 LOL
 
r.i.kid

r.i.kid

Well-Known Member
zem said:
since 4x4 is the same as 5x5, then 5x5 is the same as 6x6, therefore 4x4 is the same as 6x6, there is not much difference if any, then im goin with 6x6 LOL
Click to expand...
it's 56% of 16....but from 16 to 25 is only 35% more... .35 × 25= 8.75 so 16sqf would be 2\3 the size.. so the other 35% would give you 25....but you're right also we're just approching it differently
 
zem

zem

Well-Known Member
oh man i must be retarded or something, cuz i'm not understanding you, my simple mind is going around this trying to figure out where you got the 35% from, 25/16=1.5625, i guess you flipped it upside down and divided 16/25 which gives 0.64 which leaves 0.34 , so if your calculations are right, then 140 is not 40% more than 100, it is 28.6 % more... again my simple mind cannot but say that 140 is 40% more than 100 haha
 
r.i.kid

r.i.kid

Well-Known Member
zem said:
oh man i must be retarded or something, cuz i'm not understanding you, my simple mind is going around this trying to figure out where you got the 35% from, 25/16=1.5625, i guess you flipped it upside down and divided 16/25 which gives 0.64 which leaves 0.34 , so if your calculations are right, then 140 is not 40% more than 100, it is 28.6 % more... again my simple mind cannot but say that 140 is 40% more than 100 haha
Click to expand...
lol....dude chill. part = % × whole..... so .35 is 35% sooo. .35×25 is 8.75. and 8.75 × 3 is like 26.? so 2\3 of 25 is 16 add the other 1\3 and you get 25.... man this is rough math in my head I could get the exact numbers but don't feel the need to...the point is you're adding another 1\3 from 4×4 to 5×5
 
r.i.kid

r.i.kid

Well-Known Member
zem said:
oh man i must be retarded or something, cuz i'm not understanding you, my simple mind is going around this trying to figure out where you got the 35% from, 25/16=1.5625, i guess you flipped it upside down and divided 16/25 which gives 0.64 which leaves 0.34 , so if your calculations are right, then 140 is not 40% more than 100, it is 28.6 % more... again my simple mind cannot but say that 140 is 40% more than 100 haha
Click to expand...
didn't do so well with fractions in math?....it's all good. I have to use fractions a lot only reason I can tolerate them....but like I said you're also right just in a different way
 
r.i.kid

r.i.kid

Well-Known Member
zem said:
oh man i must be retarded or something, cuz i'm not understanding you, my simple mind is going around this trying to figure out where you got the 35% from, 25/16=1.5625, i guess you flipped it upside down and divided 16/25 which gives 0.64 which leaves 0.34 , so if your calculations are right, then 140 is not 40% more than 100, it is 28.6 % more... again my simple mind cannot but say that 140 is 40% more than 100 haha
Click to expand...
if anything that you get out of this encounter remember. PART=% × WHOLE. you can use that formula for a lot of thing and once you understand it it makes life a lot easier
 
zem

zem

Well-Known Member
i did very well in maths and i was kidding more or less, I unlike you don't believe that we are both correct, I actually believe that you are wrong and I am correct and in fact 140 is 40% bigger than 100. it is not a perspective to be different depending on approach, it is raw science called mathematics
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top