Got to marry those girls when they are 15 or 16

beenthere

New Member
Weird how some of us can post studies and evidence to support our claims, all you can do is link to breitbart.com
Unless you can come up with something of substance to support Buckies claim and your insinuation, it's just another case of failed trolling on your part.

And i can fill a page of failed studies, just like you.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
I would bet a dollar that the first girl you had sex with was under 18, I know mine was, as was the second, the fourth, the fifth, the sixth and the seventh.
I heard those desert rats will fuck just about anything in a Marine uniform.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Unless you can come up with something of substance to support Buckies claim and your insinuation, it's just another case of failed trolling on your part.

And i can fill a page of failed studies, just like you.
i cited some bigoted statements of yours, enjoy!
 

beenthere

New Member
you're against gay marriage, thus you support inequality.
No I don't support gay marriage, however, I've stated many times that gays should have every and all rights that heterosexual married couples have.
I've also made very clear that government should stay out of all marriages.

I also don't think girls should be able to join the Boy Scouts and vise versa.

didn't i see you talking about how you went out to chic-fil-A the other day? pretty sure i did. you encourage and sponsor bigotry.

that is not a lie, that is a fact about you. you are a bigot who supports inequality and sponsors and encourages hate.

no need to lie about who you are now, bigot. i have all of your hateful remarks at the ready.
I meant what I said about Chic Fil A. And if a bunch of religious right wing nuts protested against a known gay business, I'd go out of my way to support the gay business too.

You just can't get over the fact, when it comes down to it, I'm more tolerant than you!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No I don't support gay marriage, however, I've stated many times that gays should have every and all rights that heterosexual married couples have.
but you just need to make sure they are assigned inferior, second class citizen status.

because you are a bigot.



*if a bunch of religious right wing nuts protested against a known gay business, I'd go out of my way to support the gay business too.
i actually posted that list several times, and haven't seen you express any support or mention any special trips.

i have seen you go out of your way to support anti-gay bigotry though, you even admitted it in this reply!

You just can't get over the fact, when it comes down to it, I'm more tolerant than you!
no you're not, you are an anti-gay bigot.
 

beenthere

New Member
but you just need to make sure they are assigned inferior, second class citizen status.

because you are a bigot.





i actually posted that list several times, and haven't seen you express any support or mention any special trips.

i have seen you go out of your way to support anti-gay bigotry though, you even admitted it in this reply!



no you're not, you are an anti-gay bigot.
Bucky, no one believes you anymore.
You're like the boy who cried wolf but on steroids.
It's time for you to get back to Newbie Central, show em some pics of your awesome green house grows, your cover isn't blown there.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Bucky, no one believes you anymore.
You're like the boy who cried wolf but on steroids.
It's time for you to get back to Newbie Central, show em some pics of your awesome green house grows, your cover isn't blown there.
it's a good thing they don't have to believe me, they just have to believe you.

you support inequality and sponsor bigotry. you are a hateful, intolerant bigot.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
you're against gay marriage, thus you support inequality.

didn't i see you talking about how you went out to chic-fil-A the other day? pretty sure i did. you encourage and sponsor bigotry.

that is not a lie, that is a fact about you. you are a bigot who supports inequality and sponsors and encourages hate.

no need to lie about who you are now, bigot. i have all of your hateful remarks at the ready.
Here again you are a failure of the first order.

First of all, your using bigot now, after I exposed your false use of racism. Nice to see I have had an affect on you. But you are also using bigot incorrectly. Bigotry implies hatred.

You say he is a bigot because he does not support gay marriage.

OK, but yet he says he supports some sort of civil-union in which gay couples are given all the benefits that married couples are given.

How is this bigotry? Marriage has always been, in all societies, a union between men and women. Some have allowed plural marriages, but never same-sex.

This would constitute expanding the definition of a thousands of years old institution. I dont have a problem with it, I also dont have a problem with it not happening. The compelling argument for me is the inequity that results from gay couples and federal income taxes. If that can be accomplished through civil union, then whats the beef?

two things or you are a complete failure, almost as big of a failure as a heroin junkie who steals from his parents and works at subay;

1) Explain how it is bigoted to want homosexuals to have the same rights as married couples, but under a different name so as to not alter the meaning of a word that has meant one thing since its inception.

2) Name me one civilization at any point in the history of civilizations (the closer to modern western culture, the more persuasive, IOW, Rome would be more persuasive than ancient China) - name one civilization that has extended the definition of marriage to include same sex couples.

Ill bet you cant do either of those. Being able to do either would win you the debate. But you cant do it. You wont say you cant, you wont do it, and will just come up with some bullshit reason as to why you cant.
 

beenthere

New Member
I guess the people that want to be engaged in multiple marriages are considered second class citizens to UncleBuck.
We've all witnessed his hatred of religious Americans.

But hey, he's a leftie and he's tolerant.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
beenthere, when you get bignbushy coming to your rescue, you know you are a fucked pile of bigot.




beenthere is still a racist, but here he is a bigot because it deals with orientation, not race.

you dumb pile of fuck.



because it assigns second class, inferior status to a group of people, you dumb pile of fuck.



argentina, you dumb pile of fuck.

Only in your mind could equal status equate to second class.

And as to piles of dumb fuck...

Argentina is a modern concept, notice I said history. I wasnt super clear, and did not exclude this possibility, but I figured you had some common sense and could see with the examples I gave, it was clear I was talking about longtimeago shit.

Obviously this gay marriage movement extends beyond the borders of the US, and this modern movement has been going on for a few decades. Any rational person would know that a proper response would have to been a society much older than Argentina.

I admit, I drafted the question poorly. I also aver that you chose to be dishonest with respect to the intent of the question.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I guess the people that want to be engaged in multiple marriages are considered second class citizens to UncleBuck.
We've all witnessed his hatred of religious Americans.

But hey, he's a leftie and he's tolerant.
i'm actually for polygamy, even though i abhor the idea based on the fact that it's clearly not a healthy relationship for most involved.
 

beenthere

New Member
so if civil unions and marriage are equal, then how about the straight people get civil unions and gays get marriage?

that should be fine based on your logic.
If government wasn't involved in anyone's marriage, there'd be no problem with either.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If government wasn't involved in anyone's marriage, there'd be no problem with either.
that's the bigot's last resort.

the fact is that you want to assign second class status to gays, otherwise you'd have no problem with them calling their loving partnerships "marriage" as well.

you are a hateful, intolerant POS.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
so if civil unions and marriage are equal, then how about the straight people get civil unions and gays get marriage?

that should be fine based on your logic.
I'm not opposed to polygamy.

And I would be fine if the government stepped out of the marriage business all together, and for federal purposes (and state) you filed some sort of civil union application.

If you want to get married, have a ceremony in a church, temple, mosque or whatever and it just be a spiritual word for the relationship.

I can't believe I missed this though.

You know how sometimes stupid people call Africa a country?

Well, for Christmas I got a nice gas forge and some cool bladesmithing stuff. I need a hobby and that seems cool. I've been watching YouTube all week.

Anyway, you just had one of those country of Africa moments and I was busy and missed it.

I said name a civilization and you said Argentina. Argintina is a country within the broader Latin-American sub set of western civilization.

Lol.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
that's the bigot's last resort.

the fact is that you want to assign second class status to gays, otherwise you'd have no problem with them calling their loving partnerships "marriage" as well.

you are a hateful, intolerant POS.
When you going to tell your wife and come out of the closet?
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
that's the bigot's last resort.

the fact is that you want to assign second class status to gays, otherwise you'd have no problem with them calling their loving partnerships "marriage" as well.

you are a hateful, intolerant POS.
Marriage needs a husband and a wife. If Adam and Steve get married, which one is the wife? If I get to call you cheesus's wife, then I would be ok with it for the lulz.
 
Top