cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Can you show me? I see no citation.ummm, citations are on there...
And you're right, language is fluid, words themselves have very little power and have multiple meanings etc, it's their use that determines what they mean to different people. And where I grew up, people's grand parents and even parents, used Negro as a racial slur.
Let's stop arguing semantics when the point is there is nothing wrong with what is on that form, because the black community and/or leaders in America has embraced it, especially the "old guard". I personally find it about as close in ignorance as calling themselves "nigga" but I'm a tall ass white boy, primary western European with some Native America mixed in there, I have no right to an opinion on the subjects in all honestly.
Now lets talk about why that form also says "American Indian" and I'm guessing has the word (white) next to Caucasian. It's because people are stupid and they have to spell it out for them so they know which box to tick. lol.
I will respectfully disagree with something else: Just because I am white does not disqualify me from having an opinion. What some confuse, to my displeasure, is that there is a difference between having a legitimate opinion ... and having an authoritative one.
I will be so bold as to grab my right to have an opinion in the face of those who say i have no seat at this table because I am not a _____. I belong to the same society, so I reject that self-serving line of reasoning. It is carved of the same stuff as the idea (that I recommend we all reject as manipulative unreason) that being offended about something is a good-enough reason to limit social discourse. Ultimately, it is divisive, and I see not enough resistance to the divisive force that thinking represents. What i find particularly scary though is that often the divisive force is dressed up in the sheep's clothing of pluralism, and people who are either too lazy or too intimidated to think it through swallow it. Divide et impera for our age.