Putin

[BigNBushy]

This thread is intended to be all about Putin. Putin makes me lol on a regular basis. His most recent oddity is his... Well

"Russia needs to “cleanse” itself of homosexuality if it wants to increase its birth rate." link.

I am somewhat concerned by the language he uses, "cleanse" for instance. I know it's a translation. But the article said that he used a word typically reserved for military operations. I don't think the world will allow him to "cleanse" them in the sence that that particular word brings to mind.

I do also have to lol at something else. Putin defended his new law by saying some states in the US have made homosexuality a felling. This is refuted by saying the supreme court struck those laws down, way back in 2003. However, I do think it has been much further back than that since those laws were used to actually punish anyone.

So please, let's have a good laugh at Putin. Post him doing funny things, or saying strange things. This guy is great! Unless you have to live in the country he runs.

 

[vostok]

cleanse (klnz)tr.v. cleansed, cleans·ing, cleans·es To free from dirt, defilement, or guilt; purge or clean. (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cleanse) not only a military term ...?


...and is there a difference between the sodomites of the East and West ...? go figure

 

[BigNBushy]

Cleanse is the word that was chosen when Putin's statements were translated into English from Russian. I do not know what the Russian word was, nor do I know it's meaning. I only know what the article said, that it is a word typically reserved for military operations. So is Putin waging war on homosexuals?

Is he going to send the Spetsnaz into the bath houses? I don't know. I hope not.

 

[NLXSK1]

Whether the Homosexuals were cleansed or not should have absolutely no effect on the birth rate if you think about it...

You would have to turn gays straight to affect the birth rate, not give them a shower.

Some radio announcer calls him pootie poot putin. That is what I think of when I see his name and it makes me lol!

 

[UncleBuck]

Whether the Homosexuals were cleansed or not should have absolutely no effect on the birth rate if you think about it...

You would have to turn gays straight to affect the birth rate, not give them a shower.

Some radio announcer calls him pootie poot putin. That is what I think of when I see his name and it makes me lol!

whenever i hear about a forest fire, i grab my winter jacket.

 

[NLXSK1]

whenever i hear about a forest fire, i grab my winter jacket.

Forest fires release particulate matter into the atmosphere that interferes with sunlight and thus can affect the amount of energy hitting the planet.

It isnt rocket science.

You want to tell me an invisible gas causes global warming despite no apparent correlation in recent data yet clouds of smoke cannot block the sun?? All that coolaid has caused you brain damage son...

 

[UncleBuck]

Forest fires release particulate matter into the atmosphere that interferes with sunlight and thus can affect the amount of energy hitting the planet.

It isnt rocket science.

global though?

citation needed.

You want to tell me an invisible gas causes global warming despite no apparent correlation in recent data

 

[NLXSK1]

If you look at the 2 top graphs (the ones that actually include the last decade) you can see the temperature drop off that Uncle Buck says isnt happening but is clearly shown by his own data. You amuse the shit out of me Bucky...

So the CO2 that is going up obviously correlates to the temperature that is going down.

I also love how they want to make 1/2 of a degree in temperature look enormous so of course the graph is in tenths of degrees. It isnt science, it is propaganda.

Thanks for playing, I can step in it first...

 

[UncleBuck]

the temperature drop off t...the temperature that is going down.... It isnt science, it is propaganda.

you really are stupider than dog shit.

no one says the temp is going down, you fucking child.

 

[NLXSK1]

you really are stupider than dog shit.

no one says the temp is going down, you fucking child.

Look at the 2 top graphs you posted bucky... What does it show about the temp again???

The personal attack is not going to fix the fact that you are proving my point. KTHXBYE!!

 

[UncleBuck]

Look at the 2 top graphs you posted bucky... What does it show about the temp again???

The personal attack is not going to fix the fact that you are proving my point. KTHXBYE!!

do you know what a line of best fit is and what it means when the line of best fit goes upwards?

you honestly think forest fires cause global cooling and the earth is getting cooler right now. i vacillate between laughter and cringing when an idiot like you posts.

 

[NLXSK1]

global though?

citation needed.

Do you see the red lines on the right hand side of the graphs bucky??? Do you know what direction they are moving in?? Is it upwards???

You call me a child but then post evidence that directly contradicts what you are trying to prove. Childlike eh?

 

[UncleBuck]

Do you see the red lines on the right hand side of the graphs bucky??? Do you know what direction they are moving in?? Is it upwards???

the lines go up and down but the line of best fit is clearly going upwards.

the instrumental temperature record backs this up, you fucking child.

You call me a child but then post evidence that directly contradicts what you are trying to prove. Childlike eh?

actually, the tight correlation between CO2 and temps contradicts what you said, remember?

You want to tell me an invisible gas causes global warming despite no apparent correlation in recent data

 

[NLXSK1]

the lines go up and down but the line of best fit is clearly going upwards.

the instrumental temperature record backs this up, you fucking child.




actually, the tight correlation between CO2 and temps contradicts what you said, remember?

You want to tell me an invisible gas causes global warming despite no apparent correlation in recent data

Clearly not according to the graphs you provided. The red line is temperature. The temperature is going down while the average line is meaningless at the edge of an event. You cannot predict the average of something you do not know. If the temperature goes down the average line on that graph moves accordingly.

But I understand why you dont get it. It doesnt fit your religious beliefs...

 

[UncleBuck]

The temperature is going down

the instrumental temperature record disagrees, child.

 

[NLXSK1]

the instrumental temperature record disagrees, child.

What is the average temperature going to be tomorrow bucky??

What is the average for the month once that is averaged in? How about the year? How about the century?? Oh yeah, WE DONT HAVE THE DATA...

So simple yet you cannot grasp it.

 

[UncleBuck]

What is the average temperature going to be tomorrow bucky??

What is the average for the month once that is averaged in? How about the year? How about the century?? Oh yeah, WE DONT HAVE THE DATA...

So simple yet you cannot grasp it.

Year	Global[SUP][66][/SUP]	Land[SUP][67][/SUP]	Ocean[SUP][68][/SUP]
2010	0.6590	1.0748	0.5027
2005	0.6523	1.0505	0.5007
1998	0.6325	0.9351	0.5160
2003	0.6219	0.8859	0.5207
2002	0.6130	0.9351	0.4902
2006	0.5978	0.9091	0.4792
2009	0.5957	0.8621	0.4953
2007	0.5914	1.0886	0.3900
2004	0.5779	0.8132	0.4885
2012	0.5728	0.8968	0.4509

10 warmest years on record (°C anomaly from 1901–2000 mean)

Years	Temp. anomaly (°C anomaly (°F anomaly) from 1951–1980 mean)
1910–1919	−0.276 °C (−0.497 °F)
1880–1889	−0.274 °C (−0.493 °F)
1900–1909	−0.259 °C (−0.466 °F)
1890–1899	−0.254 °C (−0.457 °F)
1920–1929	−0.175 °C (−0.315 °F)
1930–1939	−0.043 °C (−0.0774 °F)
1950–1959	−0.02 °C (−0.0360 °F)
1960–1969	−0.014 °C (−0.0252 °F)
1970–1979	−0.001 °C (−0.00180 °F)
1940–1949	0.035 °C (0.0630 °F)
1980–1989	0.176 °C (0.317 °F)
1990–1999	0.313 °C (0.563 °F)
2000–2009	0.513 °C (0.923 °F)

WOOOOOOPS.

 

[UncleBuck]

What is the average temperature going to be tomorrow bucky??

What is the average for the month once that is averaged in? How about the year? How about the century?? Oh yeah, WE DONT HAVE THE DATA...

So simple yet you cannot grasp it.

Year	Global[SUP][66][/SUP]	Land[SUP][67][/SUP]	Ocean[SUP][68][/SUP]
2010	0.6590	1.0748	0.5027
2005	0.6523	1.0505	0.5007
1998	0.6325	0.9351	0.5160
2003	0.6219	0.8859	0.5207
2002	0.6130	0.9351	0.4902
2006	0.5978	0.9091	0.4792
2009	0.5957	0.8621	0.4953
2007	0.5914	1.0886	0.3900
2004	0.5779	0.8132	0.4885
2012	0.5728	0.8968	0.4509

10 warmest years on record (°C anomaly from 1901–2000 mean)

Years	Temp. anomaly (°C anomaly (°F anomaly) from 1951–1980 mean)
1910–1919	−0.276 °C (−0.497 °F)
1880–1889	−0.274 °C (−0.493 °F)
1900–1909	−0.259 °C (−0.466 °F)
1890–1899	−0.254 °C (−0.457 °F)
1920–1929	−0.175 °C (−0.315 °F)
1930–1939	−0.043 °C (−0.0774 °F)
1950–1959	−0.02 °C (−0.0360 °F)
1960–1969	−0.014 °C (−0.0252 °F)
1970–1979	−0.001 °C (−0.00180 °F)
1940–1949	0.035 °C (0.0630 °F)
1980–1989	0.176 °C (0.317 °F)
1990–1999	0.313 °C (0.563 °F)
2000–2009	0.513 °C (0.923 °F)

WOOOOOOPS.

 

[NLXSK1]

Year	Global[SUP][66][/SUP]	Land[SUP][67][/SUP]	Ocean[SUP][68][/SUP]
2010	0.6590	1.0748	0.5027
2005	0.6523	1.0505	0.5007
1998	0.6325	0.9351	0.5160
2003	0.6219	0.8859	0.5207
2002	0.6130	0.9351	0.4902
2006	0.5978	0.9091	0.4792
2009	0.5957	0.8621	0.4953
2007	0.5914	1.0886	0.3900
2004	0.5779	0.8132	0.4885
2012	0.5728	0.8968	0.4509

Years	Temp. anomaly (°C anomaly (°F anomaly) from 1951–1980 mean)
1910–1919	−0.276 °C (−0.497 °F)
1880–1889	−0.274 °C (−0.493 °F)
1900–1909	−0.259 °C (−0.466 °F)
1890–1899	−0.254 °C (−0.457 °F)
1920–1929	−0.175 °C (−0.315 °F)
1930–1939	−0.043 °C (−0.0774 °F)
1950–1959	−0.02 °C (−0.0360 °F)
1960–1969	−0.014 °C (−0.0252 °F)
1970–1979	−0.001 °C (−0.00180 °F)
1940–1949	0.035 °C (0.0630 °F)
1980–1989	0.176 °C (0.317 °F)
1990–1999	0.313 °C (0.563 °F)
2000–2009	0.513 °C (0.923 °F)

WOOOOOOPS.

ROFLMFAO!!!

You really dont get this shit do you?

They took the average temperature between 1950 and 1980 (which is 30 years for you math impaired people) and they plotted the difference...

How does that have any relationship to global temperature over the millenia? All it proves is that you can google, copy and paste irrelevant graphs and charts to appear like you know anything about the subject.

I cant pay for this type of entertainment. Like giving a monkey an I-pad...

 

[NLXSK1]

Year	Global[SUP][66][/SUP]	Land[SUP][67][/SUP]	Ocean[SUP][68][/SUP]
2010	0.6590	1.0748	0.5027
2005	0.6523	1.0505	0.5007
1998	0.6325	0.9351	0.5160
2003	0.6219	0.8859	0.5207
2002	0.6130	0.9351	0.4902
2006	0.5978	0.9091	0.4792
2009	0.5957	0.8621	0.4953
2007	0.5914	1.0886	0.3900
2004	0.5779	0.8132	0.4885
2012	0.5728	0.8968	0.4509

Years	Temp. anomaly (°C anomaly (°F anomaly) from 1951–1980 mean)
1910–1919	−0.276 °C (−0.497 °F)
1880–1889	−0.274 °C (−0.493 °F)
1900–1909	−0.259 °C (−0.466 °F)
1890–1899	−0.254 °C (−0.457 °F)
1920–1929	−0.175 °C (−0.315 °F)
1930–1939	−0.043 °C (−0.0774 °F)
1950–1959	−0.02 °C (−0.0360 °F)
1960–1969	−0.014 °C (−0.0252 °F)
1970–1979	−0.001 °C (−0.00180 °F)
1940–1949	0.035 °C (0.0630 °F)
1980–1989	0.176 °C (0.317 °F)
1990–1999	0.313 °C (0.563 °F)
2000–2009	0.513 °C (0.923 °F)

WOOOOOOPS.

ROFLMFAO!!!

You really dont get this shit do you?

They took the average temperature between 1950 and 1980 (which is 30 years for you math impaired people) and they plotted the difference...

How does that have any relationship to global temperature over the millenia? All it proves is that you can google, copy and paste irrelevant graphs and charts to appear like you know anything about the subject.

I cant pay for this type of entertainment. Like giving a monkey an I-pad...