Club 600
- Thread starter DST
- Start date
003n1gm400
Well-Known Member
- We are at day 45 or 6.5 weeks and is it ever exciting!
Grow details
- CR+ (Blimburn) / Pinewarp (BC Bud Depot)
- Coco/perlite 50/50
- Canna Coco A+B, recently swithced to CNS17 Grow/Bloom
- Botanicare Cal/Mag+
- Liquid/DRY Koolbloom
- Dynagro Proteckt
- Two 600w HPS bulbs in a 4'w x 6'L space
All my plants were started on 10/7 and switched to flower on 12/9
This is my CR+ (blimburn seeds) topped for 8, looks like 7 but she is really bushy and one of the tops gets covered up a bit. Breeder info, and seedfinder.eu say it should be finished around 50-56 days, which if that is accurate I should be harvesting this on the 31st for 54 days in flower. I started giving her DRY koolbloom around 1.5-2 weeks ago, and I could tell a difference almost immediately.
Here is my one of my pinewarp plants (BC Bud Depot), she does not have as much purple as her sister. She is a 70 days strain, and just started receiving dry koolbloom yesterday.
Here is my 2nd pinewarp plant. She is so purple, she almost looks black. I found around 5 seeds last night, little bummed about it but oh well. Pinewarp is an outdoor strain which I am growing indoors, I don't know if that has anything to do with it. Also both pinewarp plants fan leaves curl in on themselves. The only two answers I have been able to come up with is, a defense mechanism to prevent itself from loosing to much mositure from the fan, or over fertilization. I am betting its to much nutrients, considering the breeder info says it does not need much care.
DoobieBrother
Well-Known Member
I always love hearing what can be done with an acoustic guitar (electrified):
[video=youtube_share;s1OGQQk5HpM]http://youtu.be/s1OGQQk5HpM[/video]
[video=youtube_share;s1OGQQk5HpM]http://youtu.be/s1OGQQk5HpM[/video]
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
FYI...from the Daily Mail-London
Border staff ignore drugs: Guidelines tell workers to not arrest passengers caught carrying cannabis
•Guidelines say those with 'personal use' quantities should not be arrested
•Thought to apply to amphetamines and mephedrone also
•Campaigners say ministers have 'given up' on drug enforcement laws
By Jack Doyle And David Williams
PUBLISHED: 19:31 EST, 23 January 2014 | UPDATED: 19:41 EST, 23 January 2014
Border officials have been told not to arrest passengers caught with cannabis in their luggage, a report revealed last night.
Official guidance to customs staff tells them not to arrest anyone with ‘personal use’ quantities of Class B drugs.
The rules are also thought to also apply to other drugs in that category, including amphetamines and mephedrone.
Drugs campaigners said the incident suggested ministers had ‘given up’ on enforcing drugs laws.
Mary Brett, from Cannabis Skunk Sense said: ‘This is extraordinary. Why do we bother to have laws on cannabis if they’re not going to be enforced?
‘What message does it send when people aren’t stopped with illegal drugs? We seem to have given up entirely on cannabis, and made it de-facto decriminalised.’
Details of the Border Force edict emerged in an official immigration inspectors report in to Stansted Airport.
A passenger was arrested after customs officials found cannabis in his baggage - but then let him go, the report said.
Astonishingly, the report suggested he was ‘de-arrested’ because officials concluded he was high on drugs at the time.
The report states: ‘The passenger was initially detained under immigration powers in the immigration detention suite, but was subsequently found to have a small quantity (for personal use) of what was believed to be cannabis in their baggage.
‘[He] was subsequently de-arrested and released due to a Border Force perception that they were under the influence of controlled drugs.’
The Chief Inspector commented on the incident: ‘The passenger was arrested despite previously issued guidance stating that arrests for ‘personal use’ quantities of Class B drugs were not to be undertaken (unless there were extenuating circumstances, which there were not in this case).’
‘The passenger was ‘de-arrested’ and released, even though they had been found in possession of prohibited drugs, and were perceived to be ‘under the influence’ of them.’
The incident was detailed in a report by Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration John Vine. Two years ago similar report by Mr Vine revealed passengers who come in to Gatwick with cannabis were having the drugs confiscated and then being sent on their way without even a fine or other legal sanction.
Instead customs staff were giving out oral warnings.
At the time, Home Office officials insisted that anyone caught with Class B drugs in their luggage should be arrested on the spot.
The Stansted report also revealed that illicit goods could be being smuggled in in vast quantities through the airport because of an ‘almost total absence’ of customs staff at the country’s fourth biggest airport.
Mr Vine said he was ‘surprised’ to find little visible Border Force presence in customs during the inspection visit last year.
Staff were often hauled out of customs channels to man immigration and passport checks, the report found.
This meant ‘insufficient resources were allocated to customs functions’ the report found.
Mr Vine said: ‘I was surprised to find so little visible Border Force presence in the customs channels.
‘These resources are important both to detect smugglers and provide a deterrent to others.
The airport missed its target for Class A drugs seizures last year and the report found no heroin has been seized since July 2012.
The report also found that passengers could enter the airport and buy duty-free cigarettes or tobacco but then leave the airport without travelling abroad.
The weakness in the controls was as a result of the layout of the airport’s domestic and international facilities.
Airport staff became suspicious when one passenger made repeat purchases of duty-free goods on the same day.
Immigration minister Mark Harper said: ‘We have accepted all the recommendations in the inspection report and many of the issues raised have already been addressed.
‘Since we split Border Force from UKBA, it has been making significant improvements in its performance - security has been strengthened and excessive queues are gone.
‘This extends to both passengers and goods and is underpinned, for the first time, by a clear operating mandate set by ministers.
‘Transforming all areas of Border Force will take time but I am confident that we are making the right changes with security now at the heart of everything Border Force does.’
cof
Border staff ignore drugs: Guidelines tell workers to not arrest passengers caught carrying cannabis
•Guidelines say those with 'personal use' quantities should not be arrested
•Thought to apply to amphetamines and mephedrone also
•Campaigners say ministers have 'given up' on drug enforcement laws
By Jack Doyle And David Williams
PUBLISHED: 19:31 EST, 23 January 2014 | UPDATED: 19:41 EST, 23 January 2014
Border officials have been told not to arrest passengers caught with cannabis in their luggage, a report revealed last night.
Official guidance to customs staff tells them not to arrest anyone with ‘personal use’ quantities of Class B drugs.
The rules are also thought to also apply to other drugs in that category, including amphetamines and mephedrone.
Drugs campaigners said the incident suggested ministers had ‘given up’ on enforcing drugs laws.
Mary Brett, from Cannabis Skunk Sense said: ‘This is extraordinary. Why do we bother to have laws on cannabis if they’re not going to be enforced?
‘What message does it send when people aren’t stopped with illegal drugs? We seem to have given up entirely on cannabis, and made it de-facto decriminalised.’
Details of the Border Force edict emerged in an official immigration inspectors report in to Stansted Airport.
A passenger was arrested after customs officials found cannabis in his baggage - but then let him go, the report said.
Astonishingly, the report suggested he was ‘de-arrested’ because officials concluded he was high on drugs at the time.
The report states: ‘The passenger was initially detained under immigration powers in the immigration detention suite, but was subsequently found to have a small quantity (for personal use) of what was believed to be cannabis in their baggage.
‘[He] was subsequently de-arrested and released due to a Border Force perception that they were under the influence of controlled drugs.’
The Chief Inspector commented on the incident: ‘The passenger was arrested despite previously issued guidance stating that arrests for ‘personal use’ quantities of Class B drugs were not to be undertaken (unless there were extenuating circumstances, which there were not in this case).’
‘The passenger was ‘de-arrested’ and released, even though they had been found in possession of prohibited drugs, and were perceived to be ‘under the influence’ of them.’
The incident was detailed in a report by Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration John Vine. Two years ago similar report by Mr Vine revealed passengers who come in to Gatwick with cannabis were having the drugs confiscated and then being sent on their way without even a fine or other legal sanction.
Instead customs staff were giving out oral warnings.
At the time, Home Office officials insisted that anyone caught with Class B drugs in their luggage should be arrested on the spot.
The Stansted report also revealed that illicit goods could be being smuggled in in vast quantities through the airport because of an ‘almost total absence’ of customs staff at the country’s fourth biggest airport.
Mr Vine said he was ‘surprised’ to find little visible Border Force presence in customs during the inspection visit last year.
Staff were often hauled out of customs channels to man immigration and passport checks, the report found.
This meant ‘insufficient resources were allocated to customs functions’ the report found.
Mr Vine said: ‘I was surprised to find so little visible Border Force presence in the customs channels.
‘These resources are important both to detect smugglers and provide a deterrent to others.
The airport missed its target for Class A drugs seizures last year and the report found no heroin has been seized since July 2012.
The report also found that passengers could enter the airport and buy duty-free cigarettes or tobacco but then leave the airport without travelling abroad.
The weakness in the controls was as a result of the layout of the airport’s domestic and international facilities.
Airport staff became suspicious when one passenger made repeat purchases of duty-free goods on the same day.
Immigration minister Mark Harper said: ‘We have accepted all the recommendations in the inspection report and many of the issues raised have already been addressed.
‘Since we split Border Force from UKBA, it has been making significant improvements in its performance - security has been strengthened and excessive queues are gone.
‘This extends to both passengers and goods and is underpinned, for the first time, by a clear operating mandate set by ministers.
‘Transforming all areas of Border Force will take time but I am confident that we are making the right changes with security now at the heart of everything Border Force does.’
cof
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
F.M.I.L.Y
Well-Known Member
Finally got some pr0n for the Club. All is on Day 38 of Flowering. They got fed a poop tea today!
Sour Hawaiian left and Cherry Pie right
View attachment 2972413
LA Con
View attachment 2972414View attachment 2972415
The Whole Crew
View attachment 2972417
Hey DST I am really diggin the MH/HPS mix!
Peace
FM
Sour Hawaiian left and Cherry Pie right
View attachment 2972413
LA Con
View attachment 2972414View attachment 2972415
The Whole Crew
View attachment 2972417
Hey DST I am really diggin the MH/HPS mix!
Peace
FM
DoobieBrother
Well-Known Member
My lungs & tummy were recently stunned.
*50/50 mix of Skywalker OG and some MTF
Toke as I may, puff as I might, I never COULD smoke it to where it says 600...
... 'cause a joint can't talk...
... though three in a row can get quite chatty.
Followed by this:
Time to shake it off and have a bong or three and relax before I scoop the catbox and take the last of the garbage out to the can for pick-up in 4.75hrs....
Hope the Wee D is recovering from the vaccination assault
*50/50 mix of Skywalker OG and some MTF
Toke as I may, puff as I might, I never COULD smoke it to where it says 600...
... 'cause a joint can't talk...
... though three in a row can get quite chatty.
Followed by this:
Time to shake it off and have a bong or three and relax before I scoop the catbox and take the last of the garbage out to the can for pick-up in 4.75hrs....
Hope the Wee D is recovering from the vaccination assault
LockedOutOfHeaven
Well-Known Member
Where is BB based out of?
DST
Well-Known Member
Under the Sea in an Octopuses Garden
Thanks Doob, wee man is doing great, temperature didn't even move and he seemed to sleep even better. Wife suggested we get him vaccinations every day....
The Yorkshireman
Well-Known Member
FYI...from the Daily Mail-London
Border staff ignore drugs: Guidelines tell workers to not arrest passengers caught carrying cannabis
•Guidelines say those with 'personal use' quantities should not be arrested
•Thought to apply to amphetamines and mephedrone also
•Campaigners say ministers have 'given up' on drug enforcement laws
By Jack Doyle And David Williams
PUBLISHED: 19:31 EST, 23 January 2014 | UPDATED: 19:41 EST, 23 January 2014
Border officials have been told not to arrest passengers caught with cannabis in their luggage, a report revealed last night.
Official guidance to customs staff tells them not to arrest anyone with ‘personal use’ quantities of Class B drugs.
The rules are also thought to also apply to other drugs in that category, including amphetamines and mephedrone.
Drugs campaigners said the incident suggested ministers had ‘given up’ on enforcing drugs laws.
Mary Brett, from Cannabis Skunk Sense said: ‘This is extraordinary. Why do we bother to have laws on cannabis if they’re not going to be enforced?
‘What message does it send when people aren’t stopped with illegal drugs? We seem to have given up entirely on cannabis, and made it de-facto decriminalised.’
Details of the Border Force edict emerged in an official immigration inspectors report in to Stansted Airport.
A passenger was arrested after customs officials found cannabis in his baggage - but then let him go, the report said.
Astonishingly, the report suggested he was ‘de-arrested’ because officials concluded he was high on drugs at the time.
The report states: ‘The passenger was initially detained under immigration powers in the immigration detention suite, but was subsequently found to have a small quantity (for personal use) of what was believed to be cannabis in their baggage.
‘[He] was subsequently de-arrested and released due to a Border Force perception that they were under the influence of controlled drugs.’
The Chief Inspector commented on the incident: ‘The passenger was arrested despite previously issued guidance stating that arrests for ‘personal use’ quantities of Class B drugs were not to be undertaken (unless there were extenuating circumstances, which there were not in this case).’
‘The passenger was ‘de-arrested’ and released, even though they had been found in possession of prohibited drugs, and were perceived to be ‘under the influence’ of them.’
The incident was detailed in a report by Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration John Vine. Two years ago similar report by Mr Vine revealed passengers who come in to Gatwick with cannabis were having the drugs confiscated and then being sent on their way without even a fine or other legal sanction.
Instead customs staff were giving out oral warnings.
At the time, Home Office officials insisted that anyone caught with Class B drugs in their luggage should be arrested on the spot.
The Stansted report also revealed that illicit goods could be being smuggled in in vast quantities through the airport because of an ‘almost total absence’ of customs staff at the country’s fourth biggest airport.
Mr Vine said he was ‘surprised’ to find little visible Border Force presence in customs during the inspection visit last year.
Staff were often hauled out of customs channels to man immigration and passport checks, the report found.
This meant ‘insufficient resources were allocated to customs functions’ the report found.
Mr Vine said: ‘I was surprised to find so little visible Border Force presence in the customs channels.
‘These resources are important both to detect smugglers and provide a deterrent to others.
The airport missed its target for Class A drugs seizures last year and the report found no heroin has been seized since July 2012.
The report also found that passengers could enter the airport and buy duty-free cigarettes or tobacco but then leave the airport without travelling abroad.
The weakness in the controls was as a result of the layout of the airport’s domestic and international facilities.
Airport staff became suspicious when one passenger made repeat purchases of duty-free goods on the same day.
Immigration minister Mark Harper said: ‘We have accepted all the recommendations in the inspection report and many of the issues raised have already been addressed.
‘Since we split Border Force from UKBA, it has been making significant improvements in its performance - security has been strengthened and excessive queues are gone.
‘This extends to both passengers and goods and is underpinned, for the first time, by a clear operating mandate set by ministers.
‘Transforming all areas of Border Force will take time but I am confident that we are making the right changes with security now at the heart of everything Border Force does.’
cof
It's pretty much allways been like that.
10g or under and it's a £75 on the spot fine, can't or won't pay the fine then you get a court summons through the post but still no arrest.
It seems from this article that they don't even bother fining you now.
F.M.I.L.Y
Well-Known Member
In a Big Basement near the Equator!
DST
Well-Known Member
i wish....maybe someday soon-ish, lol.
had to move a couple of plantd today -para when som guy started talking to me as i was cycling along...he was pointing at the box but fuk knows what he was actually saying.
anyhoo, pics from phone.
took the wifes trusty steed
plenty space to fill up, got another clone run to do...boooo.
off fot steak, babysitter arriving within the hour, time to get my blaze on.
slainte, DST
had to move a couple of plantd today -para when som guy started talking to me as i was cycling along...he was pointing at the box but fuk knows what he was actually saying.
anyhoo, pics from phone.
took the wifes trusty steed
plenty space to fill up, got another clone run to do...boooo.
off fot steak, babysitter arriving within the hour, time to get my blaze on.
slainte, DST
jigfresh
Well-Known Member
Haha, take the wife's ride. That will throw them off your trail. 
Funny shit bru.
Hey, we got a babysitter too! Haven't used her yet, but we found one. I like to make jokes about what I'm going to do to the babysitter. I may be in trouble too, because ours is single and hot!!!
Funny shit bru.Hey, we got a babysitter too! Haven't used her yet, but we found one. I like to make jokes about what I'm going to do to the babysitter. I may be in trouble too, because ours is single and hot!!!
whodatnation
Well-Known Member
600 leagues under the sea?Under the Sea in an Octopuses Garden
Doobs you ate that whole pizza lol
D, that guy was probably saying "where you bringing the dog pack? Ik wil wat!"
Dude, there is snow all over here haha! And its still not all that cold
how does that work? Time to get stoned and wonder around in the snow lol
