Out of 2,258 published peer reviewed articles on climate change...

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Even the UPCC has admitted that the underlying science of their hypothesis is crap...

IF that is crap the rest is crap and you have to start again from the beginning. Nobody is talking about doing that though. The left just says Oh well, puts a layer of icing over the crap and continues on like nothing happened.
Click to expand...
forest fires cause global cooling.
 
A

althor

Well-Known Member
Until they find a way to do something about "climate change" that doesn't require me to ride a bike to work every day dragging a 16ft trailer behind me and doesn't require me wearing an oxygen mask and a filter over my asshole, too fucking bad.

When these so called scientists can come up with real-life solutions then they can be taken seriously. Until then it is just an issue that is what it is.
 
tobinates559

tobinates559

Well-Known Member
"While atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased by 28 percent over the past 150 years, human-generated carbon dioxide could have played only a small part in any warming, since most of the warming occurred prior to 1940 - before most human-caused carbon dioxide emissions."

"Even if the earth's temperature has increased slightly, the increase is well within the natural range of known temperature variation over the last several thousand years years. Indeed, the earth experienced greater warming between the 10th and 15th centuries - a time when vineyards thrived in England and Vikings colonized Greenland and built settlements in Canada."

food for thought, and yes if you dont know 9/11 was a flase flag set-up similar to pearl harbor or the gulf of tonkin that took us into ww2 and Vietnam then get your facts straight and pull your head out of the sand,,the guys on here that deny all this are just beyond stupid, maybe they are just that brainwashed
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tobinates559 said:
"While atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased by 28 percent over the past 150 years, human-generated carbon dioxide could have played only a small part in any warming, since most of the warming occurred prior to 1940 - before most human-caused carbon dioxide emissions."

"Even if the earth's temperature has increased slightly, the increase is well within the natural range of known temperature variation over the last several thousand years years. Indeed, the earth experienced greater warming between the 10th and 15th centuries - a time when vineyards thrived in England and Vikings colonized Greenland and built settlements in Canada."

food for thought, and yes if you dont know 9/11 was a flase flag set-up similar to pearl harbor or the gulf of tonkin that took us into ww2 and Vietnam then get your facts straight and pull your head out of the sand,,the guys on here that deny all this are just beyond stupid, maybe they are just that brainwashed
Click to expand...
allow me to cite your unattributed copy and paste for you: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/green.htm

yes, biblebelievers.au is your source.

:lol:

talk about stupid and brainwashed.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Only 13 percent of the scientists responding to a survey conducted by the environmental organization Greenpeace believe catastrophic climate change will result from continuing current patterns of energy use.



More than 100 noted scientists, including the former president of the National Academy of Sciences, signed a letter declaring that costly actions to reduce greenhouse gases are NOT justified by the best available evidence.



 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Doer said:

More than 100 noted scientists, including the former president of the National Academy of Sciences, signed a letter declaring that costly actions to reduce greenhouse gases are NOT justified by the best available evidence.



Click to expand...
i would love for you to post that list of "noted scientists" ( :lol: ).

if you don't i will so that i may rip it to shreds for my own delight.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Only 13 percent of the scientists responding to a survey conducted by the environmental organization Greenpeace believe catastrophic climate change will result from continuing current patterns of energy use.



More than 100 noted scientists, including the former president of the National Academy of Sciences, signed a letter declaring that costly actions to reduce greenhouse gases are NOT justified by the best available evidence.



Click to expand...
Forgive me if I don't believe you. Do you have a source?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
July 11, May 22... 2013..

Not that it's needed, but couldn't you find a more relevant, up to date source to oppose climate change?


Why not hit up the Cambrian, or pre-Triassic?

I hate to call you people idiots because the dumbest of you then use that as cannon fodder to claim "see, day hate us cuz we tell da truff..", but for real, for fucks sake, you fucking idiots are goddamn idiots. I can no longer hold my tongue, as if it ever mattered in the first fuckin' place..

I'll be real with you. It doesn't matter if you get on board with it or not, climate change is viable science, the fucks who don't accept it at this point don't belong at the table. The adults who make the final decisions, who accept credible science and understand how it works do. The kids will sit out while the adults make the rational decisions. The funny thing is they'll no doubt bitch and complain about it with no basis in reality other than "dur, I disagree with that but I can't figure out why..".

Smart people make the decisions while the rest of you dumb fucks site sidelined twiddling your thumbs wondering why today might have been a little warmer than yesterday.. Don't worry about your grandchildren, the rest of us have it covered.

Morons.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
1 rejects human activity for climate change... 1.


To me, one of the most fascinating aspects of climate change denial is how deniers essentially never publish in legitimate journals, but instead rely on talk shows, grossly error-laden op-eds, and hugely out-of-date claims (that were never right to start with).

In 2012, National Science Board member James Lawrence Powell investigated peer-reviewed literature published about climate change and found that out of 13,950 articles, 13,926 supported the reality of global warming. Despite a lot of sound and fury from the denial machine, deniers have not really been able to come up with a coherent argument against a consensus. The same is true for a somewhat different study that showed a 97 percent consensus among climate scientists supporting both the reality of global warming and the fact that human emissions are behind it.

Powell recently finished another such investigation, this time looking at peer-reviewed articles published between November 2012 and December 2013. Out of 2,258 articles (with 9,136 authors), how many do you think explicitly rejected human-driven global warming? Go on, guess!

One. Yes, one. Here’s what that looks like as a pie chart:


Huh. Here’s the thing: If you listen to Fox News, or right-wing radio, or read the denier blogs, you’d have to think climate scientists were complete idiots to miss how fake global warming is. Yet despite this incredibly obvious hoax, no one ever publishes evidence exposing it. Mind you, scientists are a contrary lot. If there were solid evidence that global warming didn’t exist, or that CO2 emissions weren’t the culprit, there would be papers in the journals about it. Lots of them.

I base this on my own experience with contrary data in astronomy. In 1998, two teams of researchers found evidence that the expansion of the Universe was not slowing down, as expected, but actually speeding up. This idea is as crazy as holding a ball in your hand, letting go, and having it fall up, accelerating wildly into the sky. Yet those papers got published. They inspired lively discussion (to say the least) and motivated further observations. Careful, meticulous work was done to eliminate errors and confounding factors, until it became very clear that we were seeing an overturning of the previous paradigm. It took years, but now astronomers accept that the Universal expansion is accelerating and that dark energy is the culprit.

Mind you, dark energy is far, far weirder than anything climate change deniers have come up with, yet it became mainstream science in a decade or so. Deniers have been bloviating for longer than that, yet their claims are rejected overwhelmingly by climate scientists. Why? Because they’re wrong.

Of course, if you listen to some politicians, you’d never know. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), for example, still claims it’s all a hoax. Of course, he still thinks Climategate was a thing, when it’s been shown repeatedly to have been totally manufactured. He also thinks global warming must be wrong because it got cold outside. With all due respect to the senator, he’d fail middle school science. Good thing he’s on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. His denial of reality is joined by three-fourths of the Republicans on the House Science Committee, who still have their heads firmly buried in the sand.

Happily, though, there is opposition. Democrats in the Senate are pushing for Congress to take this situation more seriously, forming a “Climate Action Task Force” whose goal is to “wake up Congress.” They want to help organize civil groups to pressure senators into taking action about climate change.

Let me make a none-too-subtle political point here. Climate change deniers in politics and in the media are overwhelmingly Republican (or “free market libertarians,” who have aligned themselves to virtual indistinguishability from the GOP, or more likely vice versa). When I write on the politics of this issue I get accused of being biased, which is ironic indeed. I didn’t start this fight, nor did I draw the partisan lines. I’m just shining a light on them. I know some pro-science Republicans, but the ones in elected office are few and far between.
The basic science of global warming is independent of party line. It doesn’t care if you’re left, right, black, white, straight, gay, pro-gun, pro-abortion rights, pro-GMO, or pro-vaccine. It’s real, and it affects all of us. Mission No. 1 is to get people to understand this, and then to get them to elect politicians who do as well.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/01/14/climate_change_another_study_shows_they_don_t_publish_actual_papers.html
Click to expand...
i'm not sure how this will translate into a rape thread..
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
i'm not sure how this will translate into a rape thread..
Click to expand...
I've come to accept that you are in fact the one obsessed with some kind of rape fetish. Perhaps you've been raped, maybe you wantto be raped and dominated in that way, who knows. What I do know for sure is that someone without such an irrational obsession with rape wouldn't bring it up at all, yet you mention it every single instance our paths meet. Projection is very powerful, and you prove that with every single post.

Keep your rape scenarios to yourself, they only serve to stimulate your own sick fantasies and they don't belong on the board.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Lol, are they still trying to shovel this bullshit? Did I mention my son and I shoveled two metric tons of global warming the other day? Then we did doughnuts in the global warming with our Prius, oh wait...Excursion, my bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top