We can't all have rich in-laws.because they'e deluded themselves into thinking that they'll be rich and wealthy one day if they just keep saving those table scraps.
oh, and kynes carries water for the john birch society any chance he gets. you can take a look at who their founders include and put two and two together.
150% poverty is $17,235 divide by 2,000 hours, means minimum wage should be $8.62 an hour.that is left as an exercise to the reader, should you even be capable of doing math so complex.
good luck doing that on $7.25 an hour.I saved "table scraps" for years and have a paid off home.
don't forget taxes.150% poverty is $17,235 divide by 2,000 hours, means minimum wage should be $8.62 an hour.
So your "treadmill assemblers" get a guaranteed wage then for working full time?that is left as an exercise to the reader, should you even be capable of doing math so complex.
I did it on 15 as a single person......a couple at 7.25 should have no problem.....kids ironically would make it easier.good luck doing that on $7.25 an hour.
Oh, so you agree with me, taxes are theft. But whose tax rate do you use? 50% pay "no taxes."don't forget taxes.
i assemble all my own treadmills.So your "treadmill assemblers" get a guaranteed wage then for working full time?
Or are they paid on production?
Simple question and does not requite tap shoes.
i assume 6.2% SS, 1.5% medicare, 5-10% federal taxes, and another 5-10% state taxes.Oh, so you agree with me, taxes are theft. But whose tax rate do you use? 50% pay "no taxes."
why do you have some "lazy ass" working for you in the first place? aren't you some brilliant job creator? guess not.An increase in minimum wage results in firing some lazy ass, as it should be.
Tell that to Wesley Snipes. He didn't live here, made all his money in foreign countries, but went to prison for not paying taxes.i assume 6.2% SS, 1.5% medicare, 5-10% federal taxes, and another 5-10% state taxes.
and no, they are not theft. you have to consent to them. taxes are the cost of living in the best nation in the world. there is not one single decision in life that is not a cost-benefit analysis, taxes are no different.
No, it's still a strawmansee it would be a "strawman" if you were arguing for the board of a company YOU hold stock in to drop their executive compensation or raise the wages of the rank and file workers.
you are not doing that. you are arguing fthat YOUR vision of what is right be imposed on others, others who own their shit, and vote for their boards and executives.
when you try to impose YOUR views of how others should manage THEIR property, you are engaging in marxist proletarian rhetoric.
studiously avoiding the mention of Marx & Engles, not directly quoting from the manifesto or their propaganda publications, and not growing a giant marxian beard doesnt change the nature of your rhetoric.
Marxists gonna Marx.
Lots of greedy cowards in the baby boomer generationLot's of have-nots in pot forums.
No, it's still a strawman[COLOR]
http://i.imgur.com/RihOuKb.jpg[IMG]
[COLOR=#006400]So what's it called when the profits are reasonably stable, income is reasonably equal,(1950's-1970), then the rules are changed and corporations are granted the ability to influence politics and 94% of the profits and income all of a sudden go to the top 10%?
I bet you'd call that good business. I call it blatant theft of production. How can you continue to deny this is happening and support the system that causes it?[COLOR][/QUOTE]
You get no say what I do with my money, only grateful people get a cent of it.
i seriously doubt most of these mooching losers have ever seen a toyota tundra with a large glove box!Lot's of have-nots in pot forums.
Then why go into a long spiel about it? Why not just say you are 100% of the business and keep 100% of the profit Mr.Galt?well, they used to. i'm no longer splitting time.