The left, the true idiots of America where wrong is right and right is wrong...

[jahbrudda]

Reminds me of all the ditto heads who hate Ann Coulter and think she is full of shit, but love the fact she makes "liberals" mad

You mean Adam Coulter?

 

[canndo]

Food For Thought:


If an 80-year-old woman can be stripped searched by the TSA but a woman in a hi-jab is only subject to having her neck and head searched because of her religion ...
Then you might live in a country run by idiots.

By Junius P. Long

OOOPS! well you got me. I can not now nor can I answer for the TSA - one point for Mr. Long.

 

[canndo]

Who cares who wrote it, 90% of the crap on this board is from outside sources.
I also laugh at some of the stupid stuff republicans do and say, but some of you folks just blindly take sides and hunker down.
You are just being dishonest with yourself.

I believe I am about half way down this silly list, I see nothing from you and have so far with but a single exception, demonstrated my original point. You posted the challenge, how about some acknowlegement.

 

[UncleBuck]

Who cares who wrote it, 90% of the crap on this board is from outside sources.
I also laugh at some of the stupid stuff republicans do and say, but some of you folks just blindly take sides and hunker down.
You are just being dishonest with yourself.

duh bad jar.

 

[jahbrudda]

I AM answering the statements, and I believe we are talking about ... er ... contradictions. Seems to me that you are going to have to address a few of your own - IS local government of more ideological value than the Federal government? If so, you may take issue with their actions but not their inherent right to act. Or are only SOME local governments and SOME local actions acceptable?

You keep wanting to move the goal posts for some reason, it's obvious you couldn't explain the political contradictions of the original post, no worries though.

 

[UncleBuck]

You keep wanting to move the goal posts for some reason, it's obvious you couldn't explain the political contradictions of the original post, no worries though.

i see you are also illiterate.

 

[kpmarine]

Who cares who wrote it, 90% of the crap on this board is from outside sources.
I also laugh at some of the stupid stuff republicans do and say, but some of you folks just blindly take sides and hunker down.
You are just being dishonest with yourself.

I already addressed the actual OP, and explained why pretty much all of it is bullshit. Most of it isn't even actions taken by the federal government, and there are more than a couple that are outright false or misleading. On the subject of immigration reform, for example, I'm pretty sure that Reagan signed the '86 immigration reform that granted mass amnesty.

 

[kpmarine]

OOOPS! well you got me. I can not now nor can I answer for the TSA - one point for Mr. Long.

Don't concede just yet, I got you.

"The Transportation Security Administration says airline passengers won't get out of body imaging screening or pat-downs based on their religious beliefs." http://www.cbsnews.com/news/religion-offers-no-break-on-airport-screening/

 

[canndo]

You keep wanting to move the goal posts for some reason, it's obvious you couldn't explain the political contradictions of the original post, no worries though.

The GOAL post happens to be contradictions. So far I have explained, I believe, quite clearly, each and every one. Seems as though you yourself are the one toting those posts around the field. So far it seems that you have been unable to respond to any of what I have posted. Now, I hope my posts and efforts aren't wasted here, but you might just consider showing me how they are wrong. I can only presume that you are actually reading them. Usually when a person really has no answers to the posts, they bag the whole thing and ignore the poster or broadbrush his posts as irrelevent to the conversation. You aren't doing that now are you?

 

[jahbrudda]

I believe I am about half way down this silly list, I see nothing from you and have so far with but a single exception, demonstrated my original point. You posted the challenge, how about some acknowlegement.

Hey buddy, you have done nothing but deny there was no contradiction and skirted around each issue with a bunch of meaningless fluff.
But i must admit, you are not near as clumsy and reactionary as your friend Buck.

 

[canndo]

Don't concede just yet, I got you.

"The Transportation Security Administration says airline passengers won't get out of body imaging screening or pat-downs based on their religious beliefs." http://www.cbsnews.com/news/religion-offers-no-break-on-airport-screening/

Now wait, I believe CBS is on the "don't quote" list, as anything they "report" must certainly be suspect, that is unless what they report supports a conservative talking point.

 

[UncleBuck]

Hey buddy

i used to have a co-worker who used "hey buddy" in a hostile fashion as well, he was overweight, past middle aged, hopelessly alone, and had a signed picture of george w bush on his desk.

is that you mitch?

 

[jahbrudda]

The GOAL post happens to be contradictions. So far I have explained, I believe, quite clearly, each and every one. Seems as though you yourself are the one toting those posts around the field. So far it seems that you have been unable to respond to any of what I have posted. Now, I hope my posts and efforts aren't wasted here, but you might just consider showing me how they are wrong. I can only presume that you are actually reading them. Usually when a person really has no answers to the posts, they bag the whole thing and ignore the poster or broadbrush his posts as irrelevent to the conversation. You aren't doing that now are you?

Sorry pal, I'm not your high school teacher, you will have to grade your own work, but I will give you a solid B for effort.

 

[canndo]

Hey buddy, you have done nothing but deny there was no contradiction and skirted around each issue with a bunch of meaningless fluff.
But i must admit, you are not near as clumsy and reactionary as your friend Buck.

No... I have denied that there WERE contradictions, which is exactly what was requested. I go point by point, how bout you doing the same? Oh, and if we ARE to move goal posts, then we can go back to the meaninglessness of the entire post, as it has so little to do with conscience understanding of the issues at hand in this country. It is just one more attempt at making complex issues simplistic to the point of being childish - but, as so often happens, these tiny bits are served up as presentations of the behavior of liberals while in the minds of some, exaulting that same.... simplicity as sage commentary.

 

[UncleBuck]

Sorry pal, I'm not your high school teacher, you will have to grade your own work, but I will give you a solid B for effort.

i will give you a solid D, but i don't expect that your D will be solid in return without the help of pharmaceuticals.

 

[jahbrudda]

i used to have a co-worker who used "hey buddy" in a hostile fashion as well, he was overweight, past middle aged, hopelessly alone, and had a signed picture of george w bush on his desk.


is that you mitch?

Let me guess, you chose drugs over higher education, amiright?

 

[UncleBuck]

stomp out a beenthere and a jahbrudda takes her place.

 

[UncleBuck]

Let me guess, you chose drugs over higher education, amiright?

nope, i did both

if you even try to tell me that you are capable of earning a GED, i am going to laugh my ass off.

 

[robert 14617]

you'r both pretty girls now get back to the topic

 

[canndo]

Sorry pal, I'm not your high school teacher, you will have to grade your own work, but I will give you a solid B for effort.

In other words...... you can't respond in a meaningful way to my comments. You don't see a contradiction or even difference between local government and federal government or fish and people.

I've been more than polite and I have done so far what was asked. I wonder if you are capable of the same.