i totally agree with you, but unfortunately the arresting officer is often looking for someone to arrest rather than objectively assessing sobriety. Hence, per se instruction dictates that any degree of intoxication is sufficient for an arrest and the rigamarole that entails.Did you have an opinion on that article?
Copy and pastes are viewed as spam in my eyes
Anyway from the top half of the article I would completely agree..
A field sobriety test is the only conclusive evidence that one is "too impaired" to drive.
Honestly it depends on how stoned you are. I can drive after 4 bong rips no problem, but after 6 bong rips and a pinch of hash, hell no.If that study is the same study from another forum I visit, the study included people who smoked pot days ago and over a year ago, so there percents will be off by a lot. Not saying driving while stoned is bad but you shouldn't like any other drug.
Exactly, its like alchole, drink to much your impaired, drink a beer or so and your still straight to drive.Honestly it depends on how stoned you are. I can drive after 4 bong rips no problem, but after 6 bong rips and a pinch of hash, hell no.
Seriously... People get crazy with their phones. Our younger generation seems to think a text is the more important than life itself...http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/phone-use-increases-teen-crash-2978633
Better odds than when your playing on you're phone