• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Ted Nugent - Obama a Subhuman Mongrel

SnapsProvolone

SnapsProvolone

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i actually have it on tape, i might just post it for ya.

after a little reflection, i decided on a possibly better ploy.

a simple sign that says "if obama were actually like hitler, these idiots would be in an oven already".

alternately, i'm also considering a sign that says "RESTORE WHITE AMERICA: IMPEACH OBAMA".

i guarantee you that i called them more than just stupid.
Click to expand...
Boring.

If you wanna make it worth your time stick to the KKK outfit.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
SnapsProvolone said:
Boring.

If you wanna make it worth your time stick to the KKK outfit.
Click to expand...
i feel like i need 3 or 4 others willing to do the same in order for that to work best.

one time when i was 16 i donned a KFC outfit and went into KFC where (i shit you not) i was in line behind a nun. a fucking nun.

if my buddy who filmed it hadn't died in a car wreck a couple years back, i might actually ask him for the tape.
 
Pinworm

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i feel like i need 3 or 4 others willing to do the same in order for that to work best.

one time when i was 16 i donned a KFC outfit and went into KFC where (i shit you not) i was in line behind a nun. a fucking nun.

if my buddy who filmed it hadn't died in a car wreck a couple years back, i might actually ask him for the tape.
Click to expand...
Tape. That dates you, boyo. In a gnarly way though.....2 years ago I said something similar, and when i said VHS yadda yadda, dude looked at me like I just raped his grandmother. TAPE?!!!! WHAT MEANS TAPE?!!! lawls
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Yesterday on the way to get some carbeurator parts. The highway was backed up a little bit.
Seems there is a new organization that is hanging banners on overpasses that say "Impeach Obama" with a plug for a website.
Ted "Child Molester" Nugent is on the same mental bandwidth


Here is the website and their mission statement
Overpasses for America
http://overpassesforamerica.com/?page_id=2
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i was conducting a cannabis transaction in a grocery store parking lot today when i noticed two idiots with a large sign that had obama defaced to look like hitler with the headline "impeach obama" under it.

so after my transaction was complete, i strolled over to them.

my first question to them was if they had any historical perspective, and what obama had done that was comparable to killing 10+ million gays, jews, gypsies, and others.

no response. none at all.

"would you like to see our flier?"

no, i want you to name the impeachable offense.

nothing.

so i asked agian.

nothing.

and again.

nothing.

"are you too stupid to name an impeachable offense?"

nothing.

"are you too ashamed of your stupidiity to even try to name an impeachable offense?"

nothing.

"do you guys realize that you can't even support the entire basis of your reason for being in this parking lot today?"

nothing.

some guy driving by in a truck honks and gives the thumbs up.

"you sir, can you name a single impeachable offense?"

he slows down, stops, his brain stirs...."violation of civil rights!"

"can you be more specific than that?"

he drives away.

these poor, stupid people.
Click to expand...
I don't know about impeachment of the president, but maybe Congress ought to do their job and at least pretend that they represent the arm of the government that makes law. Maybe impeachment of the president is in order if he insists that he is the king, and congress and the people are subject to his whims.

Look at the list. Are these impeachable offenses? Does the oath of office mean anything?

http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/20/obama-shuns-constitution-congress-silent


  • Obama bombed Libya without a declaration of war from Congress. This arguably brought down the Gadhafi government, which led to the current state of lawlessness there, which produced the environment in which our ambassador was murdered in Benghazi in 2012 and established a dangerous precedent because Congress remained officially silent.

  • He has told the 11 million illegal immigrants who are here and subject to deportation that if they comply with a new set of rules they will not be deported. The constitutional problem is that the president wrote those rules. Only Congress can craft such rules, and by the president's doing so, he has schooled immigrants in how to avoid compliance with federal law.

  • The president has used drones to kill Americans, but claims he has done so lawfully because he complied with secret rules that he crafted. Under the Constitution, if the president wants someone dead, he must afford the person due process or ask Congress to declare war on the country housing the person. No worries, he says -- he has followed the secret rules that he wrote to govern himself when deciding whom to kill.

  • The president's agents now acknowledge that they spy on all of us all the time, including members of the judiciary and Congress. This, too, was done pursuant to a secret presidential directive, secretly approved by judges acting as clerks and not under the Constitution, and by a dozen members of Congress sworn to secrecy. No law authorized this, and the president won't discuss it meaningfully, except to condemn its revelation.

And in a series of salvos that hit home, the president has modified the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) 29 times, by changing its various dates of effectiveness for some but not for others, by changing the meanings of terms for some but not for others, and even by diluting the signature obligation we all have to obtain the platinum insurance policies it commands for some and not for others. He has done all of this on his own, with no input from Congress. He has even threatened to veto any congressional effort to enact into law the very changes he alone has made
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
The way this works is if Congress allows the President to do that, he can. And he does, and he did....obviously.

The DEMs have very little opposition, because they feel they have gotten nowhere the the PUBs, and I agree.

We will have to see, every two years, how the winds of self rule blow.

This fall WE will say what we think. And the cards will fall as they may.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Allowing a “reasonable number of relevant amendments” from the minority party has not always been considered a concession in the Senate. It was once referred to as “regular order.” Despite Reid’s claims that he has been “very generous with amendments,” the number of amendment votes per year (not counting non-binding budget amendments, which by law cannot be limited) has declined from 218 in 2007, when Reid became majority leader, to 67 in 2013. Since July of last year, Republicans have been allowed a grand total of four amendments.

Republicans complain that the media’s reporting on the “unprecedented obstructionism” of a “do-nothing Congress”
They note that House Republicans passed more than 200 bills in 2013, many of which Reid has refused to hold votes on in the Senate. House-passed legislation is readily dismissed as “dead on arrival” in the upper chamber, while the storyline surrounding Senate measures, such as the immigration bill, tends to focus on House speaker John Boehner “facing pressure” to hold a vote in the House. In reality, of the 72 bills President Obama signed into law last year, only 16 originated in the Senate.http://www.nationalreview.com/article/368369/harry-reids-obstructionism-andrew-stiles

In my opinion, Obama is abusing his executive powers to force his far left agenda on the people, he knows that many of his ideas would never pass the scrutiny of the congress they were given an up and down vote. Harry Reid provides the political protection by blocking most all amendments and bills the House passes.

There are always two sides of the story, it's horse shit that the main stream media refuses to report it..
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Right, and the entire add-on amendment no line item, no, in out vote for each thing is the Crock of Doo-Doo. And they just made that up for themselves apparently. When the old boys club does come down, let's just hope it doesn't backlash into an old girls club, but it will, before things center up.

(no a line item veto for a US President, they are not that bright)
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
The way this works is if Congress allows the President to do that, he can. And he does, and he did....obviously.

The DEMs have very little opposition, because they feel they have gotten nowhere the the PUBs, and I agree.

We will have to see, every two years, how the winds of self rule blow.

This fall WE will say what we think. And the cards will fall as they may.
Click to expand...
Might makes right!

The simple legal fact is that the president cannot make law. It is illegal for him/her to do so. Whether a "potted plant" congress stands by fecklessly while the president assumes their proper role is irrelevant to the legality of it.

One wonders whether the US will eventually reach a tipping point and we get our very own Putin.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Allowing a “reasonable number of relevant amendments” from the minority party has not always been considered a concession in the Senate. It was once referred to as “regular order.” Despite Reid’s claims that he has been “very generous with amendments,” the number of amendment votes per year (not counting non-binding budget amendments, which by law cannot be limited) has declined from 218 in 2007, when Reid became majority leader, to 67 in 2013. Since July of last year, Republicans have been allowed a grand total of four amendments.

Republicans complain that the media’s reporting on the “unprecedented obstructionism” of a “do-nothing Congress”
They note that House Republicans passed more than 200 bills in 2013, many of which Reid has refused to hold votes on in the Senate. House-passed legislation is readily dismissed as “dead on arrival” in the upper chamber, while the storyline surrounding Senate measures, such as the immigration bill, tends to focus on House speaker John Boehner “facing pressure” to hold a vote in the House. In reality, of the 72 bills President Obama signed into law last year, only 16 originated in the Senate.http://www.nationalreview.com/article/368369/harry-reids-obstructionism-andrew-stiles

In my opinion, Obama is abusing his executive powers to force his far left agenda on the people, he knows that many of his ideas would never pass the scrutiny of the congress they were given an up and down vote. Harry Reid provides the political protection by blocking most all amendments and bills the House passes.

There are always two sides of the story, it's horse shit that the main stream media refuses to report it..
Click to expand...
Bullshit
There are over 150 amendments in Obamacare that the Republicans asked for
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Bullshit
There are over 150 amendments in Obamacare that the Republicans asked for
Click to expand...
Citation?////////////

Seriously?? And not one of them voted for the thing even though there were 150 Amendments they asked for??

How wierd is that?? Oh wait, it is complete bullshit... NM..
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Might makes right!

The simple legal fact is that the president cannot make law. It is illegal for him/her to do so. Whether a "potted plant" congress stands by fecklessly while the president assumes their proper role is irrelevant to the legality of it.

One wonders whether the US will eventually reach a tipping point and we get our very own Putin.
Click to expand...
Every President all the way back to Washington has used executive orders
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein has noted that the final Democratic proposals have contained multiple GOP planks. To mention just a few:
  • Allow individuals, small businesses, and trade associations to pool together and acquire health insurance at lower prices, the same way large corporations and labor unions do
  • Give states the tools to create their own innovative reforms that lower healthcare costs
  • End junk lawsuits
  • Let families and businesses buy health insurance across state lines
Click to expand...
All that shit was contained in the final bill?? Amazing!!! Show me the part where I can buy health insurance across state lines!!

Oh wait, that wasnt in the bill... WTF???

You got played boy!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top