Good job Arizona

C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
After her support for the "interrogate anyone that looks vaguely Hispanic" law; I can see why you'd say that. She's not exactly a friend of civil rights.
Click to expand...
During her last foray into bigotry and racism. Did you notice she changed her hair style?


 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
that's fine for an actual church, but cake shops and lunch counters are not churches, and you retards fail to understand this simple concept.
Click to expand...
Private property of all manner is still private property isn't it? If a person is supposed to own something, how come you are advocating someone else determine what they will do with it?

All person own their body? Agreed? No person owns the body of another. Agreed?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Private property of all manner is still private property isn't it? If a person is supposed to own something, how come you are advocating someone else determine what they will do with it?

All person own their body? Agreed? No person owns the body of another. Agreed?
Click to expand...
You are out of gas. At the edge of the desert. Next gas station is 80 miles and it's a hundred degrees at the desert today.

I refuse to serve you any gas becuase you are a whiny retarded fuck.

now fucking die bitch
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
since no one has a right to cause harm to anyone else, the government is not depriving anyone of a single right by telling racist and bigoted business owners that they are not allowed to practice denial of service based on protected civil right statuses.

you clearly do not get how rights work.

you have a right to swing your fist, and it ends at my face.
Click to expand...

You almost understand property rights. But as usual you mix things ups a bit. Then you get all, "my best friend was black" and do your silly little meat head dance. Property rights include ownership of self and justly acquired property. While it might not be a very nice policy in how ownership is applied in all instances, in order to protect the right of the property owner they must have determination over their property, but not yours.

So you can swing your fist as fast as you want on your bulbous midget, but you can't go onto the property of others where you are not welcome and swing your fist on their bulbous midget, because you would be trespassing. Blacks and whites should have the same rights to control their own bodies and their own property, but not the property of anyone else unless the owner consents. You can't have your cake and eat somebody elses cake without their consent, sorry.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
they donated money to lobby against condemning uganda's "kill the gays" bill.

that's pretty bigoted.

you never reconciled your contradiciting views on civil rights, either.
Click to expand...

You've stumbled onto something in your flailing about. Killing gays in Uganda is an actionable act. It involves taking action against a person and creates a harm and a violation of a property right. Not wanting to associate however is neutral. The two instances are distinctly separate.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
You are out of gas. At the edge of the desert. Next gas station is 80 miles and it's a hundred degrees at the desert today.

I refuse to serve you any gas becuase you are a whiny retarded fuck.

now fucking die bitch
Click to expand...
Flip the circumstances. You are out of gas. I would likely serve you gas, despite your being a prohibitionist. The determination I made was based on my morality. If I had decided differently, I would still own the property and could have decided differently and you would have no right to use force to acquire my property. Prohibitionists like you believe it is acceptable to control others or that it is acceptable for a third party such as the super nanny to, I don't. Logic called and said your phone bill was overdue.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
aside from having a smaller set of goods and service to choose from?

do you like having less options to choose from, or more? if you have to get back in your car and drive somewhere else, does your car run for free for that extra distance?
Click to expand...

Shitty example. If a store is closed and could have provided with you something, do you break in? It isn't a persons right to force others to trade with them. All trade to be just must have the consent of the involved parties or it isn't trade, it then becomes something backed by force, like theft.

You've attempted to turn this into you riding in on your white horse and freeing the downtrodden. You are not John Brown, nor are you Lysander Spooner. You are a person with a mindset that thinks others have a right to use property without the consent of the owner. That makes you a prohibitionist like your buddy cheezy.

Respect for property insists that the owner of something determines the use or they no longer own it. It is only when you violate this respect that an action against property rights has been done. Now go start a gas station in the desert and wait for the downtrodden, they need you and don't forget to give the gerbils lots of water in the heat.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
I have gay brothers and sisters in arms who wake up screaming because of the shit they did and saw (Keep in mind, this was BEFORE DADT got repealed. I got out a few months before the repeal.); some of which decide they'd rather not wake up again. Now they get the additional joys of being treated as second class citizens in the name of a religion. My faith in my fellow man is waning...
Click to expand...

You are mixing things up a bit. If a person gay or not, went to foreign lands to kill people, they were part of a property right violation weren't they? They should feel guilty about fucking with people on their land and have been involved in perpetuating a harm. Their being gay does not mean they are exempt from respecting other people and their property does it?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You are mixing things up a bit. If a person gay or not, went to foreign lands to kill people, they were part of a property right violation weren't they? They should feel guilty about fucking with people on their land and have been involved in perpetuating a harm. Their being gay does not mean they are exempt from respecting other people and their property does it?
Click to expand...

So how is living with Grandma today you lazy sack of shit?
Ever going to get a job and support yourself? or just go on whining incessantly about how you are a slave?
Lysander Spooner was a very important aboilitionist. I am sure he would choke the living shit out of you for claimng you are enslaved by our society
 
kpmarine

kpmarine

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You are mixing things up a bit. If a person gay or not, went to foreign lands to kill people, they were part of a property right violation weren't they? They should feel guilty about fucking with people on their land and have been involved in perpetuating a harm. Their being gay does not mean they are exempt from respecting other people and their property does it?
Click to expand...
Dude, I will never speak to you about foreign policy. You think you're edgy and, as demonstrated in the quote, entirely missed the point.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Must have been schuylar.

I don't think anyone else can confirm it, but many are expecting her to use her veto power.
Click to expand...
and that is when you will cry tiny tears of sadness at the realization that not even arizona is as bigoted and hateful as you are.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
You are out of gas. At the edge of the desert. Next gas station is 80 miles and it's a hundred degrees at the desert today.

I refuse to serve you any gas becuase you are a whiny retarded fuck.

now fucking die bitch
Click to expand...
LOL not being able to get gas at your gas station is only going to be a minor inconvenience. People have these things called telephones now, but no one really uses them, they use their cell phones now.

We have had this distance talking capability for your whole lifetime now, I wonder why you never heard of it and have this notion that restricting gas sales is going to do anything but cause you less gas sales.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top