trayvan martin

jahbrudda said:
Thanks twostroke, now I'm really confused. :o
Click to expand...

I read these rules when I initially registered here.

This one sort of jumped off of the page at me.

Selective enforcement?
Hmmm?

Be Courteous!
Don't attack others. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack.
 
jahbrudda said:
Well it's quite obvious you're never read them.
Click to expand...

i did just finish reading the link you posted from the preeminent climate change denial organization of our times, the one funded by the koch brothers and exxonmobil, the same group that used to get paid by tobacco companies to deceive people like you into believing and repeating the lie that smoking is not harmful.

you might want to stop proving canndo right with all of your retarded citations.
 
UncleBuck said:
i did just finish reading the link you posted from the preeminent climate change denial organization of our times, the one funded by the koch brothers and exxonmobil, the same group that used to get paid by tobacco companies to deceive little shitcunts like you into believing and repeating the lie that smoking is not harmful.

you might want to stop proving canndo right with all of your retarded citations.
Click to expand...

I was talking about you not reading the rules, LULZ
 
The way I understand it, is that Rollie allows this forum to be spicier than the others.

I personally think the rules should still apply in here and that repeated violations will get you banned.

From my time here, I'd say it is definitely selective, except for bear. He is fair all around.
 
Antidisestablishmentarian said:
The way I understand it, is that Rollie allows this forum to be spicier than the others.

I personally think the rules should still apply in here and that repeated violations will get you banned.

From my time here, I'd say it is definitely selective, except for bear. He is fair all around.
Click to expand...

All I'm saying is, I can live with rules, especially on a private site, it's their baby and they can do what they see fit.
I'd just like a little clarification, some members on here consistently break the rules and get away with it, but some are held to a higher standard.
Like, erroneously calling a member a racist or bigot is accepted, but using the N or accusing someone of being a snitch is not?

So what is the biggest NO NO on here?
 
Probably using racial slurs.

This site being what it is, getting called a snitch or rat is pretty damn harsh, but I don't know if anyone's been banned for it. It's happened in here plenty of times, and they are still around.

The Bear can explain it better, but I haven't seen him in a while.
 
Antidisestablishmentarian said:
The way I understand it, is that Rollie allows this forum to be spicier than the others.

I personally think the rules should still apply in here and that repeated violations will get you banned.

From my time here, I'd say it is definitely selective, except for bear. He is fair all around.
Click to expand...

I agree with your assessment.
Some members are kept on a much shorter leash than others.
The great white bear is quite fair in his conduct and enforcement here.
I suspect, however, that he is not the one who hands out the different size leashes in use here.
 
My leash doesn't seem to exist....I seem to have a hand directly on my neck.
Not really sure honestly what was inappropriate about that last post.
If it were explained would that explanation need deletion as well?

Oh well transplants a callin.
 
jahbrudda said:
erroneously calling a member a racist or bigot is accepted
Click to expand...

it's really not.

but when you cite the white supremacists at numbersUSA or argue loudly in favor of anti-gay laws or post debunked, racialized pictures of dead black teens, you do earn your label.

so wear it proudly, ya racist stooge.
 
twostrokenut said:
My leash doesn't seem to exist....I seem to have a hand directly on my neck.
Not really sure honestly what was inappropriate about that last post.
If it were explained would that explanation need deletion as well?

Oh well transplants a callin.
Click to expand...

You seem to have been fitted with a shock collar instead of a leash, apparently.
Ouch.
But this is a privately owned site, so we all know that politics seem to be the determining factor.
This IS a reefer site after all.
No complaints from me, simply observations.
 
Its weird but I'm still a newb here so.
Like the post is gone, but there it is in the quote right?

Once that reads "removed" in the context here it will appear as if a racial slur was contained therein.

I realize I am just bitching, seems like the appropriate section and thread though.
 
UncleBuck said:
it's really not.

but when you cite the white supremacists at numbersUSA or argue loudly in favor of anti-gay laws or post debunked, racialized pictures of dead black teens, you do earn your label.

so wear it proudly, ya racist stooge.
Click to expand...

You my friend break the rules on a daily basis, but somehow manage to keep your privileges.
But when someone accuses you of being a snitch, you claim it will get them suspended, how is that?

UncleBuck said:
so feel free to call me a snitch, it will only get you banned even quicker than your white supremacy tendencies will.
Click to expand...
 
twostrokenut said:
Its weird but I'm still a newb here so.
Like the post is gone, but there it is in the quote right?

Once that reads "removed" in the context here it will appear as if a racial slur was contained therein.

I realize I am just bitching, seems like the appropriate section and thread though.
Click to expand...

leave the bitching to the bitches, i always say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top