Good job Arizona

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
See you are too simple minded to understand:

I posted the definition of deviant in reply to another post, and like it or not homosexuality fits the definition of deviant behavior, and this is why many find it offensive.

I personally have nothing against anyone simply based on their sexual preference, color, or religion for that matter.
I do however have a big problem with you, or anyone else telling me that I must accept your actions and beliefs, while you refuse to do the same for those offended by these same actions.


You take away any and all credibility from your cause when you deny others the same rights you have so adamantly demand for yourself.
you said deviance was the definition of homosexuality and i'm here to show you with citation, you were incorrect.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Can you give a couple of examples where republican politicians are forcing the bible down everybody's throats.
there's been this string of bills going around lately wherein republican bible thumping shitcunts like you are trying to force your religious bigotry onto anyone you find objectionable, it's kinda the topic of this thread, beenthere.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Normal is what 90 percent of people are, and not what 10 percent of others are. Gay people make up about 1 in 10. Therefore, they are deviant by nature, because they deviate from the norm.
No - I am not wrong.

The definition of deviant I posted is the accepted definition, and it does not make any difference if it is describing sexual preference, opinion, or even a different phenotype in your weed.
deviant has to do with accepted social standards, and as you can tell by the massive repudiation of this anti-gay POS bill, only a handful of bigots like you and uncleben can't accept that some people like to fuck people of the same sex.

it's a normal variation of human sexuality, just like left handedness or green eyes is a normal variation of handedness or eye color.

you dumb hateful fucks are on the losing side of this one.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
there's been this string of bills going around lately wherein republican bible thumping shitcunts like you are trying to force your religious bigotry onto anyone you find objectionable, it's kinda the topic of this thread, beenthere.
Citation needed.
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
paraphilia [per′əfil′yə] Etymology: Gk, para + philein, to love

sexual perversion or deviation. A condition in which the sexual instinct is expressed in ways that are socially prohibited or unacceptable or are biologically undesirable, such as the use of a nonhuman object for sexual arousal, sexual activity with another person that involves real or simulated suffering or humiliation, or sexual relations with a nonconsenting partner.
By that definition, every woman who uses a power tool is deviant.
Would that mean all women could be denied service at a cake shop under the failed bill?

Man, this shit gets complicated the more I contemplate it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
sometimes i like to put my penis between my wife's large breasts and thrust repeatedly until i spray semen all over her face neck and chest.

does this make me a sexual deviant? should i go back to missionary only and only when procreating?
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
sometimes i like to put my penis between my wife's large breasts and thrust repeatedly until i spray semen all over her face neck and chest.

does this make me a sexual deviant? should i go back to missionary only and only when procreating?
You got a little nozzle on the end of your dick or what?
 

theexpress

Well-Known Member
sometimes i like to put my penis between my wife's large breasts and thrust repeatedly until i spray semen all over her face neck and chest.

does this make me a sexual deviant? should i go back to missionary only and only when procreating?
sometimes when your doing this im in the bushes beating my meat watching it all from the window.....
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
Haha I hadn't thought of that.
Well, there you go. It's all the more reason why it would have been entertaining--for all of the 2 or 3 days the law would've lasted for--to see the aftermath of this ill-thought piece of legislation.

Then again, it may have just been business as usual?
Who knows?

But there is still an after-party of loons to laugh at...:lol:

Jack-Booted Homo Fascist Thugs :lol: This guy is fucking nuts, and the squirrel!

[video=youtube;PmwCkpbU7Do]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmwCkpbU7Do[/video]
 

angelsbandit

Well-Known Member
you said deviance was the definition of homosexuality and i'm here to show you with citation, you were incorrect.
No I didn't, I said homosexuality is deviant behavior by definition.

I then posted the definition to show what deviant means for simple minded folks like you, and like it or not homosexuality is deviant behavior.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No I didn't, I said homosexuality is deviant behavior by definition.

I then posted the definition to show what deviant means for simple minded folks like you, and like it or not homosexuality is deviant behavior.

de·vi·ant
ˈdēvēənt/
adjective
adjective: deviant
1.
departing from usual or accepted standards, esp. in social or sexual behavior.



everyone but hateful bigots like you think of homosexuality as just another way that two consenting adults express their love, a completely acceptable and usual variation of human sexuality.

in case you missed it, even arizona rejected anti-gay measures.

the world is changing around you, bigot. you have to deal with it.
 

angelsbandit

Well-Known Member
deviant has to do with accepted social standards, and as you can tell by the massive repudiation of this anti-gay POS bill, only a handful of bigots like you and uncleben can't accept that some people like to fuck people of the same sex.

it's a normal variation of human sexuality, just like left handedness or green eyes is a normal variation of handedness or eye color.

you dumb hateful fucks are on the losing side of this one.
Irrational much? I think you should step away from the bottle......

Since you want to grandstand instead of addressing my point that you can't expect to push your lifestyle on others while denying them the same respect:
Do being a pedophile, psychopath, sociopath, practicing bestiality, or necrophilia all fit your "normal variation" theory as well?

This is not about whether or not homosexuality is wrong, this is about you being able to force your deviant lifestyle on others in their own business.
The whole point here is that you can not demand rights for yourself while refusing the same rights to others, which is what simple minded folks like you seem to be unable to comprehend.

You, and any points you have tried to make are useless as long as you continue with your own bigotry aimed at those who simply want to not be exposed to what they find offensive.

Those who find homosexuality wrong do so because of deep personal beliefs, and not due to premeditated meanness like you seem to think.
The hatred shown here has all been very one sided, and you are the one firmly entrenched in this hatred.
 
Top