Good job Arizona

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
angelsbandit said:
Do being a pedophile, psychopath, sociopath, practicing bestiality, or necrophilia all fit your "normal variation" theory as well?
Click to expand...
two consenting adults of the same sex having a loving relationship: normal variation of human sexuality, accepted by society.

you fucking your horse or little kids or dead grandma: not normal, not consenting, not accepted by society, harmful.

do you get the difference?


angelsbandit said:
This is not about whether or not homosexuality is wrong
Click to expand...
you can say that, but it's meaningless since you are trying to assign "deviance" (i.e., unacceptability) to being gay.


angelsbandit said:
this is about you being able to force your deviant lifestyle on others in their own business.
The whole point here is that you can not demand rights for yourself while refusing the same rights to others
Click to expand...
"force your deviant lifestyle on others in their own business" by buying goods and services? what a fucking travesty.

since no one has the right to harm others, you are only showcasing your own ignorance by claiming that causing harm to others is your right.

now take your hateful, bigoted ignorance over to stormfront where it belongs.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
accepted by who? the overwhelming majority of society.

feel free to marginalize yourself as the hateful, racist bigot that you are, no sweat off my nutsack.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
accepted by who? the overwhelming majority of society.

feel free to marginalize yourself as the hateful, racist bigot that you are, no sweat off my nutsack.
Click to expand...
Who's Uncle Ben hurting besides your crotch from those panties in a bunch? I have better things to worry about, like which movie to watch. Maybe Akira.
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
accepted by who? the overwhelming majority of society.

feel free to marginalize yourself as the hateful, racist bigot that you are, no sweat off my nutsack.
Click to expand...
That "overwhelming majority of society" that keeps voting to ban same sex marriage? They have a funny way of showing it.

Normal is sexual attraction to sexually mature members of the opposite sex.

Abnormal/deviant is attraction to members of the same sex, the sexually immature, animals, the deceased, inanimate objects, ect..

The only saving grace of homosexuality is that it has the potential to manifest amongst consenting adults. But it is not normal.
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
Normal is what 90 percent of people are, and not what 10 percent of others are. Gay people make up about 1 in 10. Therefore, they are deviant by nature, because they deviate from the norm.
Click to expand...
BigNBushy said:
The only saving grace of homosexuality is that it has the potential to manifest amongst consenting adults. But it is not normal.
Click to expand...
That's interesting how you use statistics to bolster your argument.
Is it normal to believe in the new testament? Or is that deviant by definition, as well?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
That "overwhelming majority of society" that keeps voting to ban same sex marriage? They have a funny way of showing it.

Normal is sexual attraction to sexually mature members of the opposite sex.

Abnormal/deviant is attraction to members of the same sex, the sexually immature, animals, the deceased, inanimate objects, ect..

The only saving grace of homosexuality is that it has the potential to manifest amongst consenting adults. But it is not normal.
Click to expand...
[video=youtube;_5aIqG35hQg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5aIqG35hQg[/video]
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
probably not a good idea to advertise goods and services to the public if you want to be left alone, dumbass.
Click to expand...

That's a good point, but not in the way you think. If people were not restricted by the "freedom of the press" they could advertise who they are inviting onto their property and who they were not. Of course that would require that people actually have freedom of the press and that they actually possessed all the characteristics of "ownership" of the property that is ostensibly theirs. No need to call me dumbass, poopy pants.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
there's been this string of bills going around lately wherein republican bible thumping shitcunts like you are trying to force your religious bigotry onto anyone you find objectionable, it's kinda the topic of this thread, beenthere.
Click to expand...
While I have no great love for bible thumping republican shitcunts, I think the relevant question is what is force and when is it being initiated.

The gay couple has every right to be gay and to have a wonderful cake and wedding if that is what turns them on. The republican bible thumpers have every right to be shitcunts on their own property. Neither of them have a right to make the others do things for them by entering the others property with the intent to use force or threaten them with force.
Both of them have the right to SELF DETERMINATION, but not the right to determine what others will do with their property.

Sometimes you miss the obvious. If you throw a little more fluid and overhand, you won't throw like a girl so much.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
two consenting adults of the same sex having a loving relationship: normal variation of human sexuality, accepted by society.

you fucking your horse or little kids or dead grandma: not normal, not consenting, not accepted by society, harmful.

do you get the difference?




you can say that, but it's meaningless since you are trying to assign "deviance" (i.e., unacceptability) to being gay.




"force your deviant lifestyle on others in their own business" by buying goods and services? what a fucking travesty.

since no one has the right to harm others, you are only showcasing your own ignorance by claiming that causing harm to others is your right.

now take your hateful, bigoted ignorance over to stormfront where it belongs.
Click to expand...


You almost get it sometimes. Of course human interactions should involve "consenting adults" . THAT is the point. Nobody should force themselves on another or on their property if the owner does not consent. To embrace a law that violates that makes you a hypocrite. You will really do better if you stop arguing against yourself, you could get very dizzy that way.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
woody333333 said:
those aren't gay dogs....... who humps who is how dogs determine rank in the pack.... its also the reason the neighbors dog humps your leg....
Click to expand...

Whew!!! Thanks for the tip. For a minute I thought my neighbors dog was gonna make me bake him a cake.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Of course human interactions should involve "consenting adults" . THAT is the point. Nobody should force themselves on another or on their property if the owner does not consent.
Click to expand...
Just a hypothetical I'm curious how you would answer..

What if a black business owner on the bottom floor of a 5 story building has a fire, but the only firemen that show up are white and he doesn't want any of them inside his business to put out the fire, what happens to the other 4 floors?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top