That would be pretty damning, but one, that isn't what he said, and two, he said that long after you started calling him a racist. At that point, you went at him because he said mulatto, which is ok by nearly everyone, except you.
Now, what was really said was;
The method they chose to end the racist practices wasn't good idea. And I tend to agree. Although the harm done by those racist practices was greater than the harm of the cure, they could have done it a better way. The method they chose, which was a vast expansion of the commerce clause, or rather the power that clause gives congress, has resulted in a much more powerful federal government that has used that ability to do more than ban white only water fountains.
He didn't say that they couldn't build a mosque. Again you over simplify to make him look bad. Were talking about the ground zero mosque. Like freedom of speech does not let you yell fire in a theatre, or incite violence, he was advocating for a similar limit on the freedom of religion. The exact same argument could be used to keep the westborough baptist church from picketing soldier funerals and is reasonable. You are presenting it as if he was advocating Muslims not being able to build a mosque at any location in general.
He called the president a mulatto, which by definition he is, and the word "mulatto" is a little archaic, but not considered grossly offensive by anyone outside of you, and other racial extremists.
But still, you were calling him a racist well before any of those came to light. None of them are racist. And in order to convince anyone he is you resort to lying about what he was saying and presenting it sans context.
He did not advocate segregation, religious persecution, or any widely recognized racial slurs. You made all that shit up.
