Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
What would you call someone who sees the evidence and dismisses it because it contradicts their beliefs?
US college professor demands imprisonment for climate-change deniers
- Thread starter squarepush3r
- Start date
- Status
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it's not about winning!
it's about what the evidence supports!
and the evidence supports the notion that human activities are contributing the the increase in global temperatures!!!!
what is so hard!!!! to understand!!!! about this!!!!!!!!
Doer
Well-Known Member
That's funny. Because you posted before and after. So you ignored it. It was addessed to you, had your quote, etc. Heck and, I bet Wav saw it. I think Heck commented.
I was answering you. And you did see it. That day, in that thread, I reminded you. And still no comment.
So, the dangling now, seems contrived.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Quote the post or tell me what post it is so I can go back and read it
Doer
Well-Known Member
But, I do see the baby word game.
I listed proof I would need to say the earth is even warming at all.
Until you do that; you show any evidence, these Sagansims don't rise to the level of adult discussion, imo.
You cannot slide into home plate from 1/2 way out.
There is no observed warming. Models don't match up. With no models there can be no actual scientific consensus.
First show warming. Then try to fix blame. Two different subjects.
I listed proof I would need to say the earth is even warming at all.
Until you do that; you show any evidence, these Sagansims don't rise to the level of adult discussion, imo.
You cannot slide into home plate from 1/2 way out.
There is no observed warming. Models don't match up. With no models there can be no actual scientific consensus.
First show warming. Then try to fix blame. Two different subjects.
Wavels
Well-Known Member
Well first of all, I am taken aback by the sheer thoughtfulness of your post...you have hit upon the crux of the matter very adeptly, there is ,contrary to your contention, real, actual scientific evidence which at the very least should give you ACC devotees pause, nope, you guys want to simply sweep it under the old rug, so nobody can see it at all.
If you truly had current evidence on your side, none among you would run from any chance to debate.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the evidence!! is still overwhelmingly in favor!!!! of human activities contributing! to a rise!! in global temperatures!!!!!!!!
and if!!! you disagree with! the! evidence!! then you literally!!!! are killing jews!!! in gas chambers!!!!
and it's! all because!! the daily!! caller!!! said! so!!!!
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"what would you accept as proof?"
"I already told you"
"..I must have missed it, can you tell me again?"
"oh now you're lying?"
"...no... I simply missed it if you posted it, can you post it again..?"
"NO! I'm not lying. I POSTED IT TWICE ALREADY!! You're a LIAR!!!"
"OK crazy, continue to be crazy then..."
@ Wavels, this is why we don't debate
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
false.
false. (how many times must i show you the models and reality?)
there already is.
are you a 0%er? because not even most of the skeptics are 0%ers.
also, just to make sure, do you ever round up large populations of jewish people, strip them of their possessions under false pretenses, put them on trains to concentration areas, force them to labor against their will, and then take their hair and teeth for resources before gassing them to death?
Wavels
Well-Known Member
Hahaha...amusing hysteria...hahah...
Hyperventilating simply makes my point...Nazis wish to stifle any and all dissent through any means necessary.
Stifling debate and acting like the thought police is a big help to your cause.
Repeat your mind-less piffle ad nauseum, this will help those who are undecided clarify their thoughts.
Why so fearful of the truth?
Ideological blinders in place.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
https://www.rollitup.org/groups/politics-2-1.html
!! !!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !! ! !!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! !! !!!! !! ! !!! !!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!! ! !! !!!!!!, !!!! !! ! !!!!!!! !! ! !!!!!!!! !.
Wavels
Well-Known Member
Well let me make it very simple;
The vast majority of computer models which are relied upon to advance the theory of ACC have been egregiously inaccurate.
Show me some models which posses even a paucity of accuracy and I may come around to your POV.
As of now, they simply and truly do NOT exist.
See that was easy, no?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Wavels
Well-Known Member
Buck, I enjoy a few beers now and then, but the rage you display can only be driven by booze...
PM me if you are desirous of some prodigiously powerful and potent buds...I will help you out.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
ad hom nazi.Buck, I enjoy a few beers now and then, but the rage you display can only be driven by booze...
PM me if you are desirous of some prodigiously powerful and potent buds...I will help you out.
Wavels
Well-Known Member
Living in the past will not help you with the future.
Did you see what happened to the Leftists in France this past weekend?
Strap yourself in Ubucky, put on your helmet....you had best be ready for the future.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sorry, just pointing out a very, very recent instance where nazis like you were beholden to ideology over science.
Wavels
Well-Known Member
That is vulgar and inappropriate, but understandable given your lack of ability.ad hom nazi.
Sad.
- Status