You just cant make this shit up!! No wonder there is crickets from the left... LOL!!

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
Moving the whole house, damn? What park are you guys moving it to this time?

Obviously it's all in a days work for you, but I have better things to do than follow your links around the web.

How bout you get off this shit and google a new motorcycle or something. Yamaha has a new triple out. Wait a few months and the heroes who couldn't wait will have them up for sale for 40% off.
Click to expand...
no thanks, but your fellow stormfronter twostroke might be interested in some new wheels.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
and yet again, a complete absence of fact or logic.
Click to expand...
Pray tell Bucky, what are the recent results of the ratings regarding MSNBC vs. their competition?

And keep in mind that the November midterms are rapidly approaching.
We shall all see.

Get back to me on the ratings if you please.
Should I hold my breath....naaa, not a good idea?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
Pray tell Bucky, what are the recent results of the ratings regarding MSNBC vs. their competition?

And keep in mind that the November midterms are rapidly approaching.
We shall all see.

Get back to me on the ratings if you please.
Should I hold my breath....naaa, not a good idea?
Click to expand...
i fail to see what MSNBC's ratings have to do with the delusions you harbor.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so the TV viewing habits of other people has some bearing on your intelligence (or more accurately, lack thereof)?
Click to expand...

We shall see if my predictions of defeat for the Dems and MSNBC bear any fruit.
Patience Dear Buck.


BTW, one of my first full time jobs was working as a mover and packer.
I do not envy your moving and packing stuff up, as it is grueling, tedious, grunt worthy hard work.
I did it myself about six months ago...and I hate to say it is becoming more and more laborious for me to be self reliant.
Good Luck!
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:

We shall see if my predictions of defeat for the Dems and MSNBC bear any fruit.
Patience Dear Buck.
Click to expand...
my god, you are insufferably stupid.

first of all, MSNBC is not running for any office.

secondly, that's not even your prediction. that dems lose the senate is my prediction and nate silver's too.

just like with roy spencer and the heartland institute, you're just repeating what you've heard. so congratulations, you have the intelligence of a parrot who can use a thesaurus.

if that happens, it won't be because the republicans are popular or have new life. they are not popular. obamacare is twice as popular as the republicans. and with the map becoming more diverse and republicans like you more comfortable with your racism, bigotry, homophobia, xenophobia, islamophobia and misogyny, you are a dying party.

the legislative branch swing in the midterms is just historical fact. it happens every time.

that you try to read this as a sign that people like your horribly hateful and bigoted dying party is just laughable.

but not as laughable as your love for the heartland institute.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
my god, you are insufferably stupid.

first of all, MSNBC is not running for any office.

secondly, that's not even your prediction. that dems lose the senate is my prediction and nate silver's too.

just like with roy spencer and the heartland institute, you're just repeating what you've heard. so congratulations, you have the intelligence of a parrot who can use a thesaurus.

if that happens, it won't be because the republicans are popular or have new life. they are not popular. obamacare is twice as popular as the republicans. and with the map becoming more diverse and republicans like you more comfortable with your racism, bigotry, homophobia, xenophobia, islamophobia and misogyny, you are a dying party.

the legislative branch swing in the midterms is just historical fact. it happens every time.

that you try to read this as a sign that people like your horribly hateful and bigoted dying party is just laughable.

but not as laughable as your love for the heartland institute.
Click to expand...

Wow, so incredibly and transparently desperate...my sympathies. Here are theresults of a recent poll. And I will concede that you are correct about theeven more abysmal public approval of Congress. But, if you Dems lose in theupcoming midterms, what does this say?... because these numbers aretopsy-turvy. How does this auger well for you Progs in the race for POTUS in2016?
BTW, your nonchalant dismissal of the tankingof MSNBCs ratings and commercial revenue, simply reflects the lack of interestamong past enthusiasts of Hope and Change, and underscores the degree to whicheven the most staunch supporters of the doofus in the oval office has turnedoff or repulsed voters. A perfect storm, or from your POV...something wickedthis way comes.
I hope you have astorm shelter to provide refuge! PLUNGE: New poll shows Obamacare support at 26% http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/28/obama-health-law-fails-gain-support-poll/
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
But, if you Dems lose in theupcoming midterms, what does this say?
Click to expand...


absolutely nothing, becauselow turnout favors republicans. especially with a democrat as president.
Wavels said:

even the most staunch supporters of the doofus in the oval office has turnedoff or repulsed voters.
Click to expand...


yawn. you were blathering the same nonsense back in 2012 and then obama went on to another landslide electoral win.

loser.
Wavels said:
New poll shows Obamacare support at 26% http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/28/obama-health-law-fails-gain-support-poll/
Click to expand...
too stupid to know what an outlier is, eh?

figures. you are insuffferably dumb, after all.

FOX News3/23 - 3/251015 RV4056Against/Oppose +16
Associated Press/GfK3/20 - 3/241012 A2643Against/Oppose +17
Rasmussen Reports*3/22 - 3/231000 LV4254Against/Oppose +12
CBS News3/20 - 3/231097 A4153Against/Oppose +12
GWU/Battleground3/16 - 3/201000 LV4353Against/Oppose +10
Pew Research2/27 - 3/163335 A4153Against/Oppose +12
Rasmussen Reports*3/8 - 3/91000 LV4056Against/Oppose +16
CNN/Opinion Research3/7 - 3/9801 A3957Against/Oppose +18
PPP (D)3/6 - 3/91152 RV3948Against/Oppose +9
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl3/5 - 3/91000 A3549Against/Oppose +14
FOX News3/2 - 3/41002 RV3857Against/Oppose +19
Gallup2/28 - 3/21533 A4055Against/Oppose +15
Rasmussen Reports*2/28 - 3/11000 LV4056Against/Oppose +16
Rasmussen Reports*2/14 - 2/151000 LV4552Against/Oppose +7
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Uncle Buck turns a thread into an attack on a perceived racist??? I am shocked!!
Click to expand...
perceived racist?

his sig literally reads "multiculturalism destroys culture", an endorsement of white separatism that you'll find on stormfront and american renaissance.

i keep saying, you guys don't have to play dumb. it's redundant.
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
personally connected $650 an hour law firm hired by christie on the taxpayer dime no less.
Click to expand...
$650 an hour is pretty cheap. Just as with many other professionals, when you hire a law firm to investigate something, they will tell you sure, I'll take the money and do the work, but you might not like what I find.

If it ever comes to light that the governor had a big hand in this, or any hand at all, the reputation of the law firm will be tattered, and they could lose their license.

He did the only thing he could do, find someone to look into it.

They apparently didn't find anything.

I would like to see Obama hire someone to look into all his scandals, but he just sweeps them under the rug.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:


Look Bucky, what happened in the 1998 midterms?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_1998
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1998
Click to expand...
thanks for proving my point. it's historical fact, not republican popularity.


this marked the first time since 1934 that the out-of-Presidency party failed to gain congressional seats in a mid-term election, and the first time since 1822 that the party not in control of the White House failed to gain seats in the mid-term election of a President's second term.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Dear Buck, was it not you who chose to use the word "everytime"?
Yup that is what you said.
You are a funny guy UB!
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
Dear Buck, was it not you who chose to use the word "everytime"?
Yup that is what you said.
You are a funny guy UB!
Click to expand...
woops, totally forgot about 1822.

:lol:

i guess i meant "basically" every time.

have fun misinterpreting basic historical fact as new wind to your dying, bigoted, hateful party. maybe have (read: pay) the heartland institute do a study (read: tell you what you paid them to tell you) about it for good measure.
 
D

Dark Leviathan

New Member
MuyLocoNC said:
You just don't get it NLXSK1, if we had more restrictions against law abiding citizens, this kind of crime wouldn't be possible. I don't think you're wired properly to follow logic this obvious to the Libs. Might I suggest a lobotomy and some tights?
Click to expand...
Suggesting that all Libs have had lobotomy's and wear tights?
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
woops, totally forgot about 1822.

:lol:

i guess i meant "basically" every time.

have fun misinterpreting basic historical fact as new wind to your dying, bigoted, hateful party. maybe have (read: pay) the heartland institute do a study (read: tell you what you paid them to tell you) about it for good measure.
Click to expand...
Yes, thanks for re enforcing my contention that what makes these (2014) mids so interesting is that the Pubs were depicted as above, and therefore how could they have any chance of holding the house and retaking the senate this November?
Keep in mind that the Pubs were considered viable back in 1998. I do not think they were being written off back then as you Progs have been gleefully proclaiming that they were this past Nov 2013.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
Yes, thanks for re enforcing my contention that what makes these (2014) mids so interesting is that the Pubs were depicted as above, and therefore how could they have any chance of holding the house and retaking the senate this November?
Keep in mind that the Pubs were considered viable back in 1998. I do not think they were being written off back then as you Progs have been gleefully proclaiming that they were this past Nov 2013.
Click to expand...
I'm sure it has nothing to do with 95% of candidates who outspend their opponents during political campaigns win, or nothing to do with political donations (read:bribes) from Democracy loving corporate conservatives donating record breaking amounts as early as March when the elections take place in November... Absolutely nothing to do with that.. It's totally because white American Christian conservative values are being culturally accepted by the growing latino population and black communities all throughout the south. Women all across America have finally realized they shouldn't have rights to their own bodies, everyone's turned to Jesus and rejoiced in His grace, the youth and young adults of America have all decided to get 3 jobs at minimum wage and pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and all the disgusting homosexuals went back in the closet where they belong.

Yep..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top