Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

I don't want a world of private clubs, but I don't think it would be that way. I have more faith in people. my place would be called" The All Welcome Inn."


I would not discriminate based on something stupid like a persons race. Although people with gerbils in their ass that like to shit on the floor would not be welcome.
 
because government guns are in the mix. we have not, and never will achieve a peaceful society from under the shadow of a government gun. I don't have all the answers. I just know we can't there from this statist paradigm.
 
Nobody owns me
I'm not property.

You don't "own" yourself? You shouldn't be the one to determine how and what you will do?

I think you own yourself.

Also, you never told me what you think a person can and cannot own. You are apparently okay with non owners controlling a private individuals property though.
 
because government guns are in the mix. we have not, and never will achieve a peaceful society from under the shadow of a government gun. I don't have all the answers. I just know we can't there from this statist paradigm.

i bet you feel too smart for your trailer when you type "statist paradigm".

too bad you're still trailer trash.
 
You don't "own" yourself?

i am myself.

your retarded worldview depends on the wholesale rape of the english language.

in your twisted world, a black guy walking into a public restaurant and trying to peacefully buy a sandwich is "initiating aggression", causing an "invasion", and acting on par with a rapist or KKK lynch mob, whereas a racist business owner who kicks out black people is being "peaceful".

you are a stooge and there is a reason why no one else shares your delusions.
 
now all you need to do is find someone, anyone, who will share in your retarded view that the denial of service to blacks did not cause harm.



that would the racist store owners. it's kinda recorded history and all.


So if you need something and see that another person owns it....you are okay with making a "deal" with them that does not require their consent to the deal? Now all you need to do is clean the floor at Wendy's.

Consensual transactions require the agreement of both parties. When one party does not consent and the other party forces the deal anyway....what do you call that?

I ask you questions knowing full well you will never answer them, because you can't.
 
So if you need something and see that another person owns it....you are okay with making a "deal" with them that does not require their consent to the deal? Now all you need to do is clean the floor at Wendy's.

Consensual transactions require the agreement of both parties. When one party does not consent and the other party forces the deal anyway....what do you call that?

I ask you questions knowing full well you will never answer them, because you can't.


i've already answered your questions over and over.

what you have failed to do is find one single other person that agrees with your retarded notion that denial of service to blacks did not cause harm.

we agree that there is no "right" to cause harm, now all you need is to find someone else that shares your delusion.

not even the guy who thinks he is the messiah is as deluded as you are.
 
i am myself.

your retarded worldview depends on the wholesale rape of the english language.

in your twisted world, a black guy walking into a public restaurant and trying to peacefully buy a sandwich is "initiating aggression", causing an "invasion", and acting on par with a rapist or KKK lynch mob, whereas a racist business owner who kicks out black people is being "peaceful".

you are a stooge and there is a reason why no one else shares your delusions.
Like button...
 
i am myself.

your retarded worldview depends on the wholesale rape of the english language.

in your twisted world, a black guy walking into a public restaurant and trying to peacefully buy a sandwich is "initiating aggression", causing an "invasion", and acting on par with a rapist or KKK lynch mob, whereas a racist business owner who kicks out black people is being "peaceful".

you are a stooge and there is a reason why no one else shares your delusions.


Race is irrelevant. You are jacking off with a flaccid dick.

I'm going to have to ask you to consider whether any person regardless of their race has a right to control their own property and engage in transactions on a consensual basis. If you disagree with that premise, I think we know who is doing the raping Mr. Can't Comprehend Simple Concepts.
 
i've already answered your questions over and over.

what you have failed to do is find one single other person that agrees with your retarded notion that denial of service to blacks did not cause harm.

we agree that there is no "right" to cause harm, now all you need is to find someone else that shares your delusion.

not even the guy who thinks he is the messiah is as deluded as you are.


So you are okay with forcing people to serve others? Isn't that what slave owners did?
 
images
 
Back
Top