Child Rapist Gets Raped, Stitched Up By Medics, Then Raped Again By 20 Men.

natro.hydro

natro.hydro

Well-Known Member
And no offence bro but you make whack comparisons to prove your point. Ganja growing victimless crime, kiddie porn you thorouhly acknowledged the victim in the situation, while he was not directly hurting a child he was perpetuating it fully by using the porn. You still get charged with purchasing illegal shit whether you were complicit or not....

Sent from my SCH-R930 using Rollitup mobile app
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
Other than the fact that the homosexual population is estimated to be 10%, and that of sex crimes against children boys make up way more than 10%.

Gay pedophiles prefer boys.

Straight pedophiles prefer girls.

You'd think then that for every boy molested there would be 9 girls.

But it's about 50/50.

The implications are obvious.
Click to expand...
and once again, ZERO evidence, no citation, only your own retarde musings.
 
kelly4

kelly4

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
I look at it like this...

Looking at cp isn't the same as making cp, everyone has their demons and people shouldn't be thrown in cages unless they're hurting someone.

The child in the picture was harmed by another, not him, and if these guys can satisfy their urges by looking at a picture instead of going out and harming a child, well so be it.

What if you lived in a prohibition state and your neighbor saw your grow light and got you thrown in jail?

I just mind my own business.
Click to expand...
I'm speechless...you're an idiot.
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
killemsoftly said:
Possession of child-pornography is illegal. And immoral. It doesn't satisfy paedophiles to merely 'look'. You are arguing that it's a victimless crime to merely view it. I don't agree.
The analogy you make with mj is absurd. It's dissembling.
This argument is bankrupt and ill-informed.
Click to expand...
That is your opinion, and you may well be correct.

I don't think someone deserves to spend 10 years in a cage for jerking off to a naked picture of a 10 year old he had no part in producing or distributing.

If he is taking the picture, lock his ass up.

The analogy to weed was just an analogy to snitching.

It's not my business what you grow in your closet or what you beat off to.
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
and once again, ZERO evidence, no citation, only your own retarde musings.
Click to expand...
Again, you could easily find the statistics and prove me wrong if they weren't what I said they were.

Yet you don't, because what I said was accurate and you're butt hurt by the findings.

So you make an even dumber statement.
 
killemsoftly

killemsoftly

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
Why?

Because I didn't snitch on a dude?
Click to expand...
What if he'd been a muslim and you had observed disturbing changes in his behaviour then seen plans for a terrorist attack on his laptop?
Can you see where I'm going?
Most of us will cut our friends certain amounts of slack, there are lines, no?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
You're unable to refute it.

If this were a court room the judge would grant me a default judgment.
Click to expand...
no, the judge would ask you for proof of your claims.

you made the claims, you have the burden of proof. i'll just go ahead and refute your shit anyway eventually, when you are too much of a coward and chickenshit little bigot POS to back up your own claims.

you sick pedo fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top