UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
first reason listed, six full sentences dedicated to it.mmmmmm...........Kool-Aid
first reason listed, six full sentences dedicated to it.mmmmmm...........Kool-Aid
So the fuck what? That was over 153 years ago. No one is even alive from then now.first reason listed, six full sentences dedicated to it.
I gotta admit. The bucktard is correct in that slavery played a major role in secession, it was either the first or second reason in the majority of states declarations. Tariffs played a role too but the ruling elite didn't want to give up slaves.mmmmmm...........Kool-Aid
No.so black families should have endured another 50 or so years of slavery so that racist like you wouldn't be so bitter?
i'd love to see you preach this in real life.
that's not what you argue over on pocket 5s, two face.I gotta admit. The bucktard is correct in that slavery played a major role in secession
well that didn't take long. now the states were just "pretending" it was about slavery when they said so as they seceded.pretending it was the war on slavery helps people to justify it.
and historical revisionism gives way to outright historical denialism.There was no hatred prior to the civil war.
more historical revisionism.The south didn't start the war though.
I worded that poorly.and historical revisionism gives way to outright historical denialism.
you're an idiot.I worded that poorly.
The words I chose seem to contemplate that everyone loved blacks.
They were thought of like cattle. They were just as nice, or cruel to the slaves as they are cattle or pigs. That's almost evil in my book.
But, it wasn't the same flavor as lynch mobs.
Firing the first shot, and starting the war are not the same thing.more historical revisionism.
the south fired the first shot.
so the south fractured the union and fired first, but it's all totally the north's fault.Firing the first shot, and starting the war are not the same thing.
FT. Sumpter was being occupied by a foreign army and they refused to leave.
Abe made it clear there would be a war.
He had already made it clear he was going to invade.
The war was started before any shots were fired.
The first shots were fired by cadets who where protecting themselves from Northern thieves. Castle doctrine and all.more historical revisionism.
the south fired the first shot.
If Canada raised an army, massed it on our border, and said they were coming, would we be guilty of starting the war if we attacked them?so the south fractured the union and fired first, but it's all totally the north's fault.
If state sovereignty is eliminated by the central planners this our most likely outcome anyway. USSR is the blue print for what not to do. We have a good deal too many people here that think Russia just did it wrong.There is also a good chance that there would be 5 or 6 countries in what is now the United States.
I think secession of a number of states is a rather good idea.If state sovereignty is eliminated by the central planners this our most likely outcome anyway. USSR is the blue print for what not to do. We have a good deal too many people here that think Russia just did it wrong.
All politicians are pedophiles. Another reason not to vote.I will never vote for a candidate who has been evenslightly sympathetic to those who advocate for pedophiles. Just rubs me the wrong way.
If that was an intentional pun then bravo . Agree about pedos though. They are the nut low.I will never vote for a candidate who has been evenslightly sympathetic to those who advocate for pedophiles. Just rubs me the wrong way.