Elliot Rodger's had Aspergers Syndrome. Should we not allow people with Aspergers to own guns?

Should people with Aspergers, a form of autism that makes people lack empathy, own guns?

  • Yes, allow them to have guns.

    Votes: 9 47.4%

  • No, they lack empathy.

    Votes: 10 52.6%
  • Total voters
    19
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Not sure if you caught this, but it was entertaining.
Click to expand...
yes, i lulzed a little
thats typical AbandonIntegrity though. he uses his chompskyite vagueism as a shield to conceal his real agenda and beliefs because they are so distasteful to pretty much everybody that he would be relegated to the fringes if he said what he really believes.

fortunately i have been examining his occasional Freudian Slips of substance and have compiled a profile of his beliefs, which clearly marks him as a Zapatista Crypto-Marxist.
it's a dirty job.
i do it so y'all wont have to.
the astute observer notes, i have called him a Zapa many times, and he never refutes it, even when he vigorously denies being a marxist, a trotskyite, a maoist and an authoritarian (the pieces that make up Zapatismo)
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
providing amusement or enjoyment

what can be owned and not owned in your system
What do you mean by equality, is it outcome? is it intellect? is it contribution?
Click to expand...
his dictionary only has 3 pages, and all of the definitions are Newspeak re-definitions designed to support Marxist rhetoric.

ask him about serfdom being voluntary...
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
you couldnt follow that simple paragraph?
i know down south of the border huffing glue is super popular, but really.
it kills brain cells.
Click to expand...
Yeah dumb ass.

It was quite typical
typical
typical
typical

Fits right in with the rest of your convoluted rants.

Typical.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Please define enjoyment.
Click to expand...
I've answered yours, In fact, I've never dodged a question from you. I'll even give your dumbass the definition of enjoyment if you would provide the same courtesy and answer what was asked of you.

what can be owned, what can't be owned in your system?
name an animal that does not have a hierarchy.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
I've answered yours, In fact, I've never dodged a question from you. I'll even give your dumbass the definition of enjoyment if you would provide the same courtesy and answer what was asked of you.

what can be owned, what can't be owned in your system?
name an animal that does not have a hierarchy.
Click to expand...
Please define definition.
 
greenlikemoney

greenlikemoney

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
cool, i'm bucky now.

thats a new one.

so far i am a servant of Monsanto, and shill for Mossad, a servant of the Israeli govt, a christian, an anarchist (lulz), a shill for the Koch Brothers, a Tea Bagger, a Paulbot, an agent provocateur for the radical right, a communist, a militant radical right winger, a nazi, a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, a climate denier, a flat earther, a conspiracy nut, a conspiracy denier, one of THEM (the ones who dont want you to know the troof) and i suppose, a secret 33rd degree mason.

i got a busy schedule.
Click to expand...
It was sarcasm. Sorry to offend you.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
The term was coined by Dejacque. Look him up.
Click to expand...
I don't care who the fuck coined the term. Alone the words socialist and libertarian are dualities of each other. Look up duality. You can't just magically put two words together and make something else because you're too lazy to actually describe what you really mean.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan said:
I don't care who the fuck coined the term. Alone the words socialist and libertarian are dualities of each other. Look up duality. You can't just magically put two words together and make something else because you're too lazy to actually describe what you really mean.
Click to expand...
No.

Libertarian is anonymous with authoritarian. Socialism is not synonymous with authoritarian. Therefore socialism and libertarianism are not anonymous.

It's not my opinion, it's factual and deductive. You're flat out wrong again.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
No.

Libertarian is anonymous with authoritarian. Socialism is not synonymous with authoritarian. Therefore socialism and libertarianism are not anonymous.

It's not my opinion, it's factual and deductive. You're flat out wrong again.
Click to expand...
The rule of law is paramount to the libertarian and focuses on the individual. Socialism focuses on the whole.
No wonder you keep asking me what simple definitions are, you have trouble with the language.

Unless you are using the french definition of libertarian that means anarcho-communist that nobody uses anymore. If that's what you use, then carry on. Just know that you are 150 years outdated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top