Elliot Rodger's had Aspergers Syndrome. Should we not allow people with Aspergers to own guns?

[ginwilly]

I use the original definition of the term libertarian.

OK, I'll remember that, it helps. By the marxist definition it's not exactly an oxymoron. By the accepted definition of today, it is.

It's like me calling myself a liberal though. Technically I'm correct, but anyone in this century thinks.. no he's not.

Hillbilly used to be defined in Webster as a nothern Michigan farmer. Do you still use it that way?

 

[Dr Kynes]

No.

Libertarian is anonymous with authoritarian. Socialism is not synonymous with authoritarian. Therefore socialism and libertarianism are not anonymous.

It's not my opinion, it's factual and deductive. You're flat out wrong again.

anonymous...

considering that abandonintellect is a disciple of chomp chomp, i doubt those are typos, but rather a deliberate ploy to make statements that SEEM to say one thing, while ultimately saying nothing.
Protip: Socialism NOT "Synonymous" with authoritarianism, but socialism is dependent on authoritarianism.

cars arent "synonymous" with gasoline either, but a car without gasoline is pretty useless.

in Marxian theory, socialism is the submission of all to "The State", as a middle ground between "Capitalism" and "Communism"
during the (unfortunate but necessary) "Socialist" period, the revolutionary proletarians are "De-Radicalized" (disarmed and pacified, so they can be controlled, manipulated and coerced into marxist ideology) and when the proles are sufficiently indoctrinated into "Scientific Marxism" (lulz, lefties LOVE to say "Science" when they mean opinion) then "The State" will dissolve itself and the "Socailist" Heirarchy will naturally give up it's power as they all progress blissfully into the "Communist Utopia"

thus we see, Socialism is Authoritarian, Statist, Dictatorial, Oppressive and Anti-Liberty, by design.

meanwhile, Liberty chafes under authoritarian rule, and where Liberty dominates, Authoritarianism finds few footholds

and thats why he wont give you any straight answers, he is a Marxian Socialist of the Mao/Trotsky branch in the Zapatista Family, and thus is heirarchical, authoritarian, oppressive, prohibitionist, deceitful, and ANTI-LIBERTY.

anything else he claims should be followed by an asterisk, and then a detailed explanation of how he is using that word today, in his special dictionary

 

[abandonconflict]

My touch phone corrected from antonymous.

 

[abandonconflict]

anonymous...

considering that abandonintellect is a disciple of chomp chomp, i doubt those are typos, but rather a deliberate ploy to make statements that SEEM to say one thing, while ultimately saying nothing.
Protip: Socialism NOT "Synonymous" with authoritarianism, but socialism is dependent on authoritarianism.

cars arent "synonymous" with gasoline either, but a car without gasoline is pretty useless.

in Marxian theory, socialism is the submission of all to "The State", as a middle ground between "Capitalism" and "Communism"
during the (unfortunate but necessary) "Socialist" period, the revolutionary proletarians are "De-Radicalized" (disarmed and pacified, so they can be controlled, manipulated and coerced into marxist ideology) and when the proles are sufficiently indoctrinated into "Scientific Marxism" (lulz, lefties LOVE to say "Science" when they mean opinion) then "The State" will dissolve itself and the "Socailist" Heirarchy will naturally give up it's power as they all progress blissfully into the "Communist Utopia"

thus we see, Socialism is Authoritarian, Statist, Dictatorial, Oppressive and Anti-Liberty, by design.

meanwhile, Liberty chafes under authoritarian rule, and where Liberty dominates, Authoritarianism finds few footholds

and thats why he wont give you any straight answers, he is a Marxian Socialist of the Mao/Trotsky branch in the Zapatista Family, and thus is heirarchical, authoritarian, oppressive, prohibitionist, deceitful, and ANTI-LIBERTY.

anything else he claims should be followed by an asterisk, and then a detailed explanation of how he is using that word today, in his special dictionary

Tldr.

Nobody gives a fuck what you think because you don't even believe the word salads you produce.

 

[Dr Kynes]

OK, I'll remember that, it helps. By the marxist definition it's not exactly an oxymoron. By the accepted definition of today, it is.

It's like me calling myself a liberal though. Technically I'm correct, but anyone in this century thinks.. no he's not.

Hillbilly used to be defined in Webster as a nothern Michigan farmer. Do you still use it that way?

yes. even by Marxian theory, Liberty and Socialism are anathema

Socialism is the system for de-radicalizing pacifying and controling the proles, and their indoctrination into "Scientific Marxism"
if you need "Socialism" then you arent yet communist enough to be trusted with "Liberty"

 

[Dr Kynes]

Tldr.

Nobody gives a fuck what you think because you don't even believe the word salads you produce.

so where is my analysis wrong?

(inB4 "my definition of _____________....")

 

[Canna Sylvan]

My touch phone corrected from antonymous.

I think the word you're looking for is "autonomous," super freak libertarian socialist.

 

[abandonconflict]

so where is my analysis wrong?

(inB4 "my definition of _____________....")

Lol

You called it an analysis.

 

[Dr Kynes]

I think the word you're looking for is "autonomous," super freak libertarian socialist.

"antonymous" is just a pretentious way of saying "Opposite"

he implies that if two words which have VERY different meanings are not polar opposites, they must be the same.

his logic fails miserably.
Example:
carrots and cyanide are not "Antonymous" so cyanide must be delicious, or carrots must be deadly.

it is sophistry of the lowest (least effective) order.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Lol

You called it an analysis.

lol.

you didnt answer the question...

 

[ginwilly]

Tldr.

Nobody gives a fuck what you think because you don't even believe the word salads you produce.

I'd like to see Chomsky in person, but the damn capitalist pig charges too much. I can't afford his pricey books either. What's he stand for btw?

 

[ginwilly]

"antonymous" is just a pretentious way of saying "Opposite"

he implies that if two words which have VERY different meanings are not polar opposites, they must be the same.

his logic fails miserably.
Example:
carrots and cyanide are not "Antonymous" so cyanide must be delicious, or carrots must be deadly.

it is sophistry of the lowest (least effective) order.

Dude, individual collectivism is all the rage, hop on.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Dude, individual collectivism is all the rage, hop on.

but i wanna ride the collectivist individualism bandwagon.
thats where all the hot girls sit.

that or the Libertarian Incarceration bandwagon.
those bitches are easy.

 

[Dr Kynes]

I'd like to see Chomsky in person, but the damn capitalist pig charges too much. I can't afford his pricey books either. What's he stand for btw?

google video search for Chomp Chomp's endless tiresome rants on the glories of a political ideology that embraces "socialism" and "liberty" in a way that is clearly impossible outside of Animal Farm.

Chomp Chomp argues for liberty for people who think like he does, and socialism for everyone who disagrees, in other words, classic marxism, just like stalin used to make.

 

[ginwilly]

but i wanna ride the collectivist individualism bandwagon.
thats where all the hot girls sit.

that or the Libertarian Incarceration bandwagon.
those bitches are easy.

you so crazy Kynes. Socialist-libertarian doesn't make sense.

 

[ginwilly]

google video search for Chomp Chomp's endless tiresome rants on the glories of a political ideology that embraces "socialism" and "liberty" in a way that is clearly impossible outside of Animal Farm.

Chomp Chomp argues for liberty for people who think like he does, and socialism for everyone who disagrees, in other words, classic marxism, just like stalin used to make.

Hmmm, then why does he charge so much? He must believe in ownership of his intellectual property, isn't that a bad thing?

 

[Dr Kynes]

you so crazy Kynes. Socialist-libertarian doesn't make sense.

nuuh uhh!

yes it doesnt!

it's totally is real too, in this imaginary ideology i just made up but cant tell you about...

i would explain in detail, but you cant handle the mind blowing Troof im spitting.

and THEY dont want you to know...

 

[Canna Sylvan]

"antonymous" is just a pretentious way of saying "Opposite"

he implies that if two words which have VERY different meanings are not polar opposites, they must be the same.

his logic fails miserably.
Example:
carrots and cyanide are not "Antonymous" so cyanide must be delicious, or carrots must be deadly.

it is sophistry of the lowest (least effective) order.

I thought he was talking about how a libertarian socialist was autonomous, meaning able to survive on its own. I know what antonymous means. But in the context it didn't make sense. Socialism and libertarianism are duals, not opposites.

Duality: an instance of opposition or contrast between two concepts or two aspects of something; a dualism.

Opposite: diametrically different; of a contrary kind: a word that is opposite in meaning to another.

Big difference.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Hmmm, then why does he charge so much? He must believe in ownership of his intellectual property, isn't that a bad thing?

he charges a lot to hear his words of wisdom because he is a classic Bolshevist.
he gets rich and lives the high life in his dacha on the black sea, while we toil in the fields, as is right for those of us not members of the super especial party elite.

 

[abandonconflict]

Yeah Chomsky is so dumb, I bet you can quote him saying all kinds of retarded shit.

"bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks." ~Noam Chomsky