Not believing that man. You're pushing a false agenda with a thesaurus and a megaphone.
if you are responding to me, try using the quote button to address your comments.
You argue the exact points conservapedia argues and throw a tantrum when wiki cites the ICPP and NASA
You cite The Heartland Institute, Roy Spencer, the John Birch Society, etc..
Seriously man, just quit trying.. you're not coming out on top on this one.. it's the entire world against your pea brained conspiracy theory hoax, you are a fool, not much more can be said..
no substantive rebuttal, merely specious claims, ad hominem and red herrings.
i have made to many VALID citations in this thread which you have summarily ignored in favour of wikipedia and blogs.
you have made bullshit claims, and FALSELY attributed them to trustworthy sources, expecting me to simply take your word for it, then you threw a tantrum and changed the subject when i demonstrated your "citation" was a bald faced lie and your claims were not found anywhere in the source's reports, just as bucky does with his dopey cartoons.
HOWEVER, bucky's dopey cartoons are mere bullshit from a bullshit artist, you try to wrap yourself in a lab coat and pretend to expertise, when everybody knows you can just BUY a lab coat.
hell i used to have to wear a lab coat on the job, does that make me a credible scientist? nope, and i never claimed to be.
i support my statements with the words of CREDIBLE SCIENTISTS, whom you (and bucky as well as the rest of your hooting peanut gallery) then try to dismiss as cranks, deniers or crackpots.
but your hysterical wailing and rending of garments is exactly as credible as a a guy with PHD in physics, who has been working for NASA and NOAA for decades.
ohh wait, no it isnt.
