3 paragraphs down, doc..
"
Although the inferred increase of solar irradiance in 24 years, about 0.1 percent, is not enough to cause notable climate change, the trend would be important if maintained for a century or more. Satellite observations of total solar irradiance have obtained a long enough record (
over 24 years) to begin looking for this effect."
Are you this guy?
24 years? Science! 120 years, NOT ENOUGH DATA!@!
Using NASA to try to discredit anthropogenic climate change is like using Richard Dawkins to discredit evolution
It's so stupid, I can hardly believe the attempt was made..
"Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural—and not a human-induced—cause,
according to one scientist's controversial theory.
Earth is currently experiencing rapid warming,
which the vast majority of climate scientists says is due to humans pumping huge amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere."
"In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for
three summers in a row."
Holy shit!! 3 whole summers in a row?!!
And that lone, brave Russian astrophysicist standing against the goliath money hungry scientific community, Khabibullo Abdusamatov, the author of that 2007 study, what's his story anyway?...
"Abdussamatov claims that "global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but from an unusually high level of solar radiation and a lengthy—almost throughout the last century—growth in its intensity." This view contradicts the mainstream scientific opinion on climate change as well as accepted reconstructions of solar activity. He has asserted that "parallel global warmings—observed simultaneously on Mars and on Earth—can only be a straightline consequence of the effect of the one same factor: a long-time change in solar irradiance."
This assertion has not been accepted by the broader scientific community, some of whom have stated that "the idea just isn't supported by the theory or by the observations" and that it "doesn't make physical sense."
Abdussamatov also contends that the natural greenhouse effect does not exist, stating
"Ascribing 'greenhouse' effect properties to the Earth's atmosphere is not scientifically substantiated." He further states that "Heated greenhouse gases, which become lighter as a result of expansion, ascend to the atmosphere only to give the absorbed heat away." He has stated that more work is needed to model the effect. However, this effect cannot happen because the mean free path of molecules in the atmosphere is very short, transferring energy by collisions and preventing greenhouse gases from retaining the excess energy they absorb.
In early 2012, Abdussamatov predicted the onset of a new "mini-iceage" commencing 2014 and becoming most severe around 2055."
LOL!
Your ego damages your character more than your ignorance ever could