Northern Iraq falls to Al Qaeda, $400 million looted from central bank.

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
The right to purchase is not an obligation to purchase. You are too dumb to argue this, you have zero understanding of derivatives, options, puts, calls, longs, shorts, or hedging. call it quits you math retard, ASU dropout.
Click to expand...
i can probably plagiarize just as good as you can.

well, probably not. i would disclose my source and not try to pawn it off as my own.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
100% donated to charity

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/18/1307821/-Dick-Cheney-Neocon-War-Profiteer

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jun/08/dick-cheney-halliburton-supreme-court

He had $20 million before he was VP.
Click to expand...
WAIT ...I thought he did not have any stock...I don't give a fuck if he donated it. He still exercised his stock option..Please tell Red he has to leave politics...lol

Do you want to now talk about how he still made money off the donation
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I take the blame on that...but he did have stock after he took office. He exercised his option
Click to expand...
An option he got as an employee would have been an option to buy. not sell. A "put" option would have lost money as the price of the stock went up, so your own "citation" proves his options were buy options. Since they still existed in 2010, he had not exercised them.
. Either way, you haven't provided the research you said you would proving he owned stock. Simply stating he owned stock because he had options isn't logical, nor is it fulfilling what you agreed to do. I didn't trick you into agreeing to that, you brought it up on your own accord. Honor your bet and leave the politics section.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
An option he got as an employee would have been an option to buy. not sell. A "put" option would have lost money as the price of the stock went up, so your own "citation" proves his options were buy options. Since they still existed in 2010, he had not exercised them.
. Either way, you haven't provided the research you said you would proving he owned stock. Simply stating he owned stock because he had options isn't logical, nor is it fulfilling what you agreed to do. I didn't trick you into agreeing to that, you brought it up on your own accord. Honor your bet and leave the politics section.
Click to expand...
you should not be here..talk to me in the grow section
 
greenlikemoney

greenlikemoney

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
here is the transcript:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1406/17/se.01.html

show me where she says "supporters of the second amendment are terrorists", you dumb racist clown.
Click to expand...
She said a minority ( meaning supporters of the 2nd amendment ) are terrorizing the majority ( meaning people like you ).....so 2nd amendment supporters are terrorists...spin it any way you want, she said it and probably now regrets saying it....( now I'll stoop to your level )....you creampie eating douchebag cuckold.
 
Last edited:
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
It took you all day to fail this badly? Honor your bet and get out of the politics section. Dishonorable, lying piece of shit.
Click to expand...
Cheney had stock options when he took office. He exercised his last stock option in 2005. You have to leave
 
DonAlejandroVega

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
quibbling over drivel. tossing the chrome molybdenum into the steel.......they cast our shackles from. thanks.
do the oligarchs attain wealth and power via war?
*Jeopardy music*

don't make me bring out Bobby, the 12 year-old retarded boy, to answer, an' make y'all look bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top