I've seen active (currently interrupting and active within the last 10000 described from the nasa link I posted first thru all the copy pastas you deluged thread with
Your at the least conflating the active in last 10000 years and claiming they really are active all the time
Who needs data behind them when name calling can negate need for evidence
Do you even bother reading links or you deliberately trying to lie?
bbc says
You really need to stop playing fast and loose with volcano definitions if you want to bitch about uncertainty
the "definition" of a "volcano" is already loose.
some geologists call many features connected to the same magma source ONE volcano, others call them MANY volcanoes.
even geologists cant agree but what they all CAN agree on, is that theres are many many many geologic features which produce substantial levels of co2, even without an "eruption"
and then theres the classification of an "eruption"
some geologists call the farting of mt aetna in 2004-2005 an "eruption" while others insist it wasnt, cuz there was no Magma
i know you want to wear the big boy trousers and tell everybody how things are gonna have to be, but i dont really care if you take your toys and go home.
cuz youre a cunt