The farce behind liberal, "I'll tax you again" global warming bullshit - volcanoes!

Who has the most affect on global warming?


  • Total voters
    19

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
i'm actually going out of my way to do the opposite of whatever you say. i feel that's the wisest thing to do.

The control I have over you is amazing. It's actually a really good start to what will become a wonderful relationship. You are learning well, young one. Stick this out and I may make you into a respectable human being.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
yeah, geology isnt very sexy, but it's still more popular than unemployable dope peddlers who sponge off their old lady and waste their time stalking people on the interwebs and ratting out other dope growers.
not a single thing you said was true, but unfortunately, it's 100% true when i note the fedora, the belly, the live in mother, the walmart job, and so much more.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
RAMPAGING ACROSS PAGE 1 LIKE HITLER ACROSS POLAND.

B================================================================D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cant stop me now, Im having such a good time, Im having a ball...
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
we've already established that your 3000 number was a fabrication

why do you instist on still using it? dont you ever ask yourself why you need to make numbers up to prove your point?
you established no such thing.

you assume so because i dont feel like digging up the previous source for you, and youre too lazy stupid and illiterate to find it yourself.



thus what we have established is, youre a cunt.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
you established no such thing.

you assume so because i dont feel like digging up the previous source for you, and youre too lazy stupid and illiterate to find it yourself.



thus what we have established is, youre a cunt.
You were more than happy to trot out multitude of links that said you were wrong
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
You were more than happy to trot out multitude of links that said you were wrong
nope, i "trotted out" a shitload of links to educate your ignorant ass in the facts.

Noteably:

1 : the definition of a "volcano" is not fixed a feature that one geologist calls a volcano could be dismissed as simply a part of another volcano 10 miles away
2 : the definition of "active" varies wildly
3 : youre a cunt.
4 : i would dig that source up again for nearly anybody except you, on account of your cuntishness.
5 : the country of Chile has more than 3000 volcanoes all by itself. http://www.weather.com/news/science/incredible-photos-chilean-volcano-erupting-20140225
6 : other sources say chile has 500 volcanoes, with only 36 of them "historically active" (which means they have erupted with Magma sometime in the last 10k years)
7 : all sources agree though, youre a cunt.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
nope, i "trotted out" a shitload of links to educate your ignorant ass in the facts.

Noteably:

1 : the definition of a "volcano" is not fixed a feature that one geologist calls a volcano could be dismissed as simply a part of another volcano 10 miles away
2 : the definition of "active" varies wildly
I've seen active (currently interrupting and active within the last 10000 described from the nasa link I posted first thru all the copy pastas you deluged thread with

Your at the least conflating the active in last 10000 years and claiming they really are active all the time
3 : youre a cunt.
4 : i would dig that source up again for nearly anybody except you, on account of your cuntishness.
Who needs data behind them when name calling can negate need for evidence
5 : the country of Chile has more than 3000 volcanoes all by itself. http://www.weather.com/news/science/incredible-photos-chilean-volcano-erupting-20140225
Do you even bother reading links or you deliberately trying to lie?

According to the BBC, Chile is one of the most volcanic countries on earth with more than 3,000 volcanoes along its length.
bbc says
There are over 3,000 volcanoes dotted along its length, and around 80 of them are active.
[/QUOTE]
6 : other sources say chile has 500 volcanoes, with only 36 of them "historically active" (which means they have erupted with Magma sometime in the last 10k years)
7 : all sources agree though, youre a cunt.
You really need to stop playing fast and loose with volcano definitions if you want to bitch about uncertainty
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
I've seen active (currently interrupting and active within the last 10000 described from the nasa link I posted first thru all the copy pastas you deluged thread with

Your at the least conflating the active in last 10000 years and claiming they really are active all the time

Who needs data behind them when name calling can negate need for evidence

Do you even bother reading links or you deliberately trying to lie?


bbc says


You really need to stop playing fast and loose with volcano definitions if you want to bitch about uncertainty
the "definition" of a "volcano" is already loose.

some geologists call many features connected to the same magma source ONE volcano, others call them MANY volcanoes.

even geologists cant agree but what they all CAN agree on, is that theres are many many many geologic features which produce substantial levels of co2, even without an "eruption"

and then theres the classification of an "eruption"

some geologists call the farting of mt aetna in 2004-2005 an "eruption" while others insist it wasnt, cuz there was no Magma

i know you want to wear the big boy trousers and tell everybody how things are gonna have to be, but i dont really care if you take your toys and go home.

cuz youre a cunt
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
the "definition" of a "volcano" is already loose.
The only person being loose with definition is yourself

All the copy pastas you posted have similar numbers and definitions for active and active in last 10000 years
some geologists call many features connected to the same magma source ONE volcano, others call them MANY volcanoes.
You have yet to show 1 reputable geologist claim there are 3000 active (as in right now 24/7/365)

As in you play fast and loose not them
even geologists cant agree but what they all CAN agree on, is that theres are many many many geologic features which produce substantial levels of co2, even without an "eruption"
As with the nasa link and your copy pastas they give a much much smaller number of erupting volcanos vs active or active in last 10000years

And again not any of them are 3000
and then theres the classification of an "eruption"
Playing fast and loose with eruption definition doesn't solve your active definition problems
some geologists call the farting of mt aetna in 2004-2005 an "eruption" while others insist it wasnt, cuz there was no Magma
But all geologists happily class it as active so this is red herring
i know you want to wear the big boy trousers and tell everybody how things are gonna have to be, but i dont really care if you take your toys and go home.

cuz youre a cunt
If you want to spend 30 pages making up math to support your bullshit then it's up to you to make sure the numbers you use are correct no?
 
Top